首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
1 In proposed changes to Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in education, the Bush administration want
1 In proposed changes to Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in education, the Bush administration want
admin
2013-06-12
41
问题
1 In proposed changes to Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in education, the Bush administration wants to encourage creation of single-sex public schools and classes.
2 Our studies of sexism in America’s education system have praised private single-sex schools because they offer the promise that education can transform the future of girls. Girls who attend these schools speak more freely in class, are more likely to major in math and science, and perhaps most encouraging, are more likely to attend college and graduate school.
3 So, given our past support for single-sex schools, you might expect us to be real cheerleaders for the new Bush administration plan.
4 But we are not cheering.
5 There is a right way and a wrong way to explore educational innovation, and the Bush administration has chosen the latter. Congress and the public should stop it before the real problems begin.
6 The No Child Left Behind Act promises to avoid fads and to build educational programs based on scientific evidence and research. But, for public single-sex education, the Bush administration has decided we can skip the evidence. This proposal ignores sound educational policy, and is particularly troubling considering that the effectiveness of single sex education in public schools—which involve different factors from private schools—has yet to be carefully studied.
7 What we applauded in private single-sex schools was not their gender uniformity, but their educational practices. Many educators, including us, attribute much of the academic successes of these private schools to their smaller class sizes, engaged parents, well-trained teachers, and strong academic emphasis. Other educators believe that single-sex schools work less well for boys than for girls, or that only boys from low-income families benefit. Still others believe such schools may intensify gender stereotypes and homophobia. But so far, the Bush plan does not address these factors.
8 This is not the first time single-sex schooling has emerged as a quick fix. Pete Wilson, the former Republican governor of California, tried the same thing in the late 1990s, and even sweetened the pot by providing some extra funds to school districts willing to experiment with single-sex schools. A half-dozen created their own single-sex academies.
9 Did students benefit from the experiment? It’s hard to say, because—like the Bush proposal—planning and evaluation were absent. California provided no training for teachers and no clear rationale for the changes, and within a few years most of these schools returned to coeducation. There were anecdotal reports that the girls enjoyed being in an environment free of sexual harassment and classroom interruptions, while the boys’ schools degenerated into a disciplinary disaster, becoming little more than magnets for troubled youth. The California experiment was a valuable lesson in how not to go about educational change—a lesson this administration has chosen to ignore.
10 What the authors of these proposed changes seem to have forgotten is that Title IX is not an educational option, it is a civil rights protection. While Title IX currently permits select single-sex classes—in physical education or to remedy past discrimination, for example—it doesn’t allow schools to segregate students arbitrarily.
11 There are powerful reasons for this. Whenever groups have been segregated, the least-valued group has ended up with fewer resources and fewer opportunities. Historically that has been a costly lesson for girls (and African-Americans and the poor). The proposed changes do not require equal treatment or equal facilities, but only "substantially equal" programs. As the proposal now stands, a school could provide a single-sex option for boys and not for girls, or cutting-edge science equipment for boys and an up-to date cosmetology center for girls.
12 The word "equal" is omitted from the proposed regulations, and replaced with a strange new concept, "voluntary civil rights." The proposed changes to Title IX sidestep many unanswered research questions in order to promote sex segregation, putting three decades of civil rights protections at risk.
13 What is needed is a thoughtful examination of the diverse single-sex schools that already exist, to see what works and what doesn’t.
14 Single-sex schooling may well provide powerful lessons for improving our public schools. But instead of a thoughtful, controlled study, the Bush proposal gives a green light to 15, 000 school districts to segregate students without purpose or preparation, a prescription for disaster.
Which of the following statements is NOT true?
选项
A、Title IX prohibits single-sex schooling.
B、Single-sex public schooling may threaten equality in education.
C、Single-sex schooling has both advantages and disadvantages.
D、Civil rights have long been under protection.
答案
A
解析
本题为细节归纳题。据第1段第1句以及第10段第2句,我们知道Title IX禁止性别歧视,而非单性别学校教育。据第u段可排除B。据第2段、第7段、第10段第2句,我们同样可以排除C。据第12段第2句后部分可以排除D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/6N4O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Somepeopleprefertoworkforalargecompany.Othersprefertoworkforasmallcompany.Whichwouldyouprefer?Usespecific
AccordingtothebluepaperreleasedbytheChineseAcademyofSocialSciences,Chinahasbecomethesecond-largestluxuryprodu
WhichoneofthefollowingstatementsistrueofWilliamFaulkner?
______looksatlanguagefromapsychologicalpointofview,andtohim,competenceisapropertyofthemindofeachindividual.
AftertheGloriousRevolution______wasestablishedinBritain.
Usually,therearetworeasonstopursuescientificknowledge:forthesakeoftheknowledgeitself,andforthepracticalu
TheArtofListeningI.Inthelastlecture,Communicationcompetence:1)personalmotivation2)communicationknow
UnderthedealagreedwiththeEuropeanparliament,bonusesbankersmaygetaslowas
在人际关系问题上我们不要太浪漫主义。人是很有趣的,往往在接触一个人时首先看到都是他或她的优点。这一点颇像是在餐馆里用餐的经验。开始吃头盘或冷碟的时候,印象很好。吃头两个主菜时,也是赞不绝口。愈吃愈趋于冷静,吃完了这顿宴席,缺点就都找出来了。于是转喜为怒,转
那还是几年前的一个早晨,在太阳刚刚升起来的时候,踏着熹微的晨光,到一个离开旅馆不远的菜市场去。到了邻近菜市场的地方,市场的气氛就逐渐浓了起来。熙熙攘攘的人群,摩肩擦背,来来往往。许多老大娘的菜篮子里装满了蔬菜海味鸡鸭鱼肉。有的篮子里活鱼在摇摆着尾巴,肥鸡在
随机试题
民事诉讼中,人民法院在审查证据时,对涉及个人隐私的证据()
男性患者,60岁。1h前看电视时突然倒地,右侧肢体无力,意识清楚,言语不清。既往有高血压病史。查体:血压210/90mmHg,意识清楚,构音障碍,右侧中枢性面舌瘫,右侧肢体肌力3级,右半身痛觉减退,右侧Babinski征阳性。以下哪项不适合给予上题的
A.电解质紊乱B.吸入性肺炎C.鼻咽及食管黏膜损伤D.恶心,腹胀,腹痛E.以上都不是肠内营养代谢性并发症是()
长期股权投资的权益法适用范围包括()。
下列选项正确的有()。
在后现代课程标准中,最重要的特性是()
如果sam.exe文件存储在一个名为ok.edu.cn的ftp服务器上用户所能访问的根目录中,那么下载该文件使用的URL为()。
在实际演奏中,五线谱在五条线上方或下方最多可加()条线。
【2015年菏泽市真题】“学而时习之”的主张说明教学应遵循的原则是()。
时间是有方向性的,总是从过去向未来流动。这就是时间之箭。在生物进化过程中,时间的过去与未来是不对称的,这是一个不可逆过程,但生物进化的时间箭头与熵增不同。熵增意味着退化,即旧事物的分解和衰亡;而进化是新事物的产生和发展,它的时间箭头是指向熵减少的。因此(
最新回复
(
0
)