2. 考研
  3. Anyone who has searched for a job fresh out of college knows how difficult it is to get that first job. Sending out hundreds of

Anyone who has searched for a job fresh out of college knows how difficult it is to get that first job. Sending out hundreds of

admin2017-12-19  22
问题    Anyone who has searched for a job fresh out of college knows how difficult it is to get that first job. Sending out hundreds of resumes, only to get a few interviews in the end—if you’re lucky!— and if you’re very lucky, eventually there’s a job offer on the table. Should you grasp it, or wait for something better to come along the way?
   It depends on whether you are a "maximizer" or a "satisficer". Maximizers want to explore every possible option before choosing a job. They gather every stick of information in the hope of making the best possible decision. If you are a satisficer, however, you make decisions based on the evidence at hand.
   Simply put, satisficers are more likely to cut their job search short and take the first job offer. Maximizers are more likely to continue searching until a better job offer comes along. Which type of approach yields the better payoff? A maximizer. Specifically, quoting the results of a study of the job search of 548 members of the Class of 2002 by Sheena Iyengar, Rachael Wells, and Barry Schwartz, the maximizers put themselves through more contortions in the job hunt. They applied to twenty jobs, on average, while satisficers applied to only ten, and they were significantly more likely to make use of outside sources of information and support. But it turned out to be worth it: the job offers they got were significantly better, in terms of salary, than what the satisficers got.
   Satisficers were offered jobs with an average starting salary of $37, 085; the average starting salary offered to maximizers was $44, 515, more than 20 percent higher. The trouble is, however, that higher pay doesn’t make maximizers a happier group than satisficers. In fact, maximizers were significantly more likely than satisficers to be unhappy with the offers they accepted.
   Evidently, being a maximizer can help you earn more income, but that income doesn’t buy more happiness, as the maximizer’s likely to agonize over the prospect of a better job offer out there he or she missed. Maximizers may have objectively superior outcomes, but they’re so busy obsessing about all the things that they could have had, they tend to be less happy with the outcomes they do get.
According to the Paragraph 3, which of the following is true?
选项 A、Maximizers can get something of value from outside information.
B、Maximizers tend to apply to more jobs than satisfiers.
C、Sheena Iyengar, Rachael Wells, and Barry Schwartz are maximizers.
D、The research showed that satisficers were more likely to make use of all the information.
答案B
解析 细节题。根据题干关键词定位到第三段。该段倒数第二句意为“他们(完美主义 者)平均申请二十个职位，而易于满足者只申请十个”，B项是此句的总结性陈述，故B项 为正确答案。A项利用文中的worth进行干扰，文中未提及。C项中的三人是研究者，文中 并没有说明他们是“完美主义者”。D项错在all一词，而文中说的是“外部信息来源”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/6mBZ777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)