首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
公务员
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development, I believe
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development, I believe
admin
2017-12-04
7
问题
I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly. As a doctor, mother and scientist in child development, I believe there is nothing to recommend it, from the baby’s point of view.
Mothers, doctors and nurses alike have no idea of where a baby’s blood sugar level lies. All we know is that a low level is harmful to brain development and makes a baby easily annoyed. In this state, the baby is difficult to calm down and sleep is impossible. The baby asks for attention by crying and searching for food with its mouth.
It is not just unkind but also dangerous to say a four-hourly feeding schedule will make a baby satisfied. The first of the experts to advocate a strict clock-watching schedule was Dr Frederic Truby King who was against feeding in the night. I’ve never heard anything so ridiculous. Baby feeding shouldn’t follow a timetable set by the mum. What is important is feeding a baby in the best way, though it may cause some inconvenience in the first few weeks.
Well, at last we have
copper-bottomed
research that supports demand feeding and points out the weaknesses of strictly timed feeding. The research finds out that babies who are fed on demand do better at school at age 5,7, 11 and 14, than babies fed according to the clock. By the age of 8, their IQ (智商) scores are four to five percent higher than babies fed by a rigid timetable. This research comes from Oxford and Essex University using a sample (样本) of 10,419 children born in the early 1990s, taking account of parental education, family income, a child’s sex and age, the mother’s health and feeding style. These results don’t surprise me. Feeding according to schedule runs the risk of harming the rapidly growing brain by taking no account of sinking blood sugar levels.
I hope this research will put an end to advocating strictly timed baby feeding practices.
The author supports feeding the baby______.
选项
A、in the night
B、every four hours
C、whenever it wants food
D、according to its blood sugar level
答案
C
解析
主旨题。通读全文可知本文就如何喂养婴儿涉及了两种观点:按时喂养和按需喂养。作者在文章的第一句“I have been consistently opposed to feeding a baby regularly”就提出观点,“反对定期喂婴儿”;最后一句“I hope this research will put an end to advocating strictly timed baby feeding practices”再次表示希望结束严格按时喂养的习惯;第四段论述了按需喂养的好处,也就是什么时候需要就喂孩子,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7Jnq777K
本试题收录于:
中学英语题库教师公开招聘分类
0
中学英语
教师公开招聘
相关试题推荐
Oneofthemostremarkablethingsaboutthehumanmindisourabilitytoimaginethefuture.Inour【C1】______wecanseewhathas
Theevidenceforharmonymaynotbeobviousinsomefamilies.Butitseemsthatfouroutoffiveyoungpeoplenowgetonwithth
Theevidenceforharmonymaynotbeobviousinsomefamilies.Butitseemsthatfouroutoffiveyoungpeoplenowgetonwithth
Theevidenceforharmonymaynotbeobviousinsomefamilies.Butitseemsthatfouroutoffiveyoungpeoplenowgetonwithth
Whatdoyouwanttobewhenyougrowup?Ateacher?Adoctor?Howaboutanice-creamtaster?Yes,therereallyisajobwher
Mymotherfeltpleasedwithherselfbecauseshe______myfathertogiveupsmoking.
Itseemsthatpoliticiansaroundtheworldarethinkingaboutthehealthoftheircountries.WhileinChina,ChenZhuhasannoun
Wewereastonished______thetemplestillinitsoriginalcondition.
—I’msorry.I______myexercisebookathome.—Don’tforget______itheretomorrowplease.
Tenyearsagothepopulationofourvillagewas______thatoftheirs.
随机试题
诊断肺结核的最主要依据是
某护士为乙肝患者更换伤口敷料时,患者血液溅入护士眼睛,这种损伤属于
通常所说的建设项目竣工验收,指的是()。
关于双代号时标网络计划与横道计划相比较的说法,正确的有()。
英国的心理学家对一个占星学院中3000多名大学生进行性格测试,发现受访者的性格竞然与其所在星座代表的性格非常相似:而在之后的针对2000名从未接触过星座学说的小学生的测试中,心理学家发现受访者的性格与星座并没有太大联系。根据这段文字,我们可以得出的结论是:
某街道当前正在开展“十佳社区评选活动”,评选方法是选择8个方面,包括:物业管理、人际关系、清洁程度、绿化程度、建筑设施安全性、社会治安指标,等等,评以1~10分之间的某一分值,然后求得8个分值的平均数即该社区得分。以下哪项是实施上述活动需要预设的前提?I
简述事实行为与民事法律行为的区别。
下列行为中,构成侵犯专利权的是()。(2011年单选30)
下列关于线性链表的叙述中,正确的是()。
Scientistsnowtendtoagreethatthenoiselevelforpotentialhearinglossbeginsatabout70decibels.Someofthemarevery
最新回复
(
0
)