首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
admin
2013-10-22
54
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image.-libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read ore, or at least buy more—several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things- records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books — have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. 1 can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless, I was brought up by people who had been taught —and who taught me—that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them, 1 should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient—yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
The author was taught the idea that books are______.
选项
A、more cherished by previous people
B、mostly stored in public libraries for free reading
C、luxuries for people when they were young
D、valuable for people to collect and treasure
答案
D
解析
细节归纳题。定位句阐述了作者对传统书籍的看法,即书是有价值的东西,值得喜欢和珍藏。由此可知答案为D)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7Oc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
OneofAmerica’smostimportant【B1】______ishermodernmusic.Americanpopularmusicisplayedallovertheworld.Itisenjoye
AreYourKidsEatingJunk?DevelopHealthyEatingHabitsInYourChildrenTheotherdayIwatchedaveryinformativedoc
A、Thewomenhavemorefreedomandcanshareindecisions.B、Thewomendonothavetobetheheadsofthefamily.C、Thewomen’sr
A、Heestablishedagovernmentservice.B、Hedevelopedasystemcalled"starroutes".C、Hebuiltalotofpostoffices.D、Heesta
A、Jillhasrecovered.B、Jillresistspracticing.C、Jillisaweakgirl.D、Jillshouldhavearest.D细节推断题。女士说有点担心Jill,因为她感冒了,但还是
WhenMITputtheircoursecontentonlinein2002,theywereexpectingtheirsitetobeoneofthemostpopularsitesaroundthe
A、Shorteningtheirnewsstories.B、loweringthepricesoftheirnewspapers.C、Addingvarietytotheirnewspapercontent.D、Inclu
A、Givepeopleproperadvice.B、Showrespecttotheirfeelings.C、Offersuggestionsinanon-judgmentalway.D、Avoidthemifthei
Whentheearthwasborntherewasnoocean.Thegraduallycoolingearthwasenvelopedinheavylayersofcloud,which【S1】_____mu
A、Itcanbeusedtocurethescar.B、ItisrichinwaterandVitaminA.C、Itcanreducethewrinklesoftheface.D、Itiseffect
随机试题
党和国家的公安基本政策,分别载入()的正式文件之中。
Itisonlyafterallthesechecksthatapassengerisallowedtoboardtheplane.
牵涉痛是指()
男,68岁。恶心、上腹隐痛、呕吐少许咖啡样液体2天。高血压、血脂异常病史2年。口服阿司匹林100mg/d。胃镜检查可见胃窦黏膜多发糜烂,表面附着血性黏液。最适应的治疗药物是()
判断牙髓活力最可靠的检查方法是
干疳的治疗原则为
不讲道理的话语逻辑是值得警惕的。长期处于这样的言论状态中,难免会影响理性表达。好的公共表达应该是温和理性的,即便是带有情绪的话语,也应该对事不对人。言论自由是我们的权利,但是说负责的话也是我们的义务,没有限度的自由只会带来人与人之间的不信任感,使得社会缺少
某企业经批准处理部分财产损溢:现金长款100元、存货损失2300元,其中1000元为大水淹毁,股权投资损失4600元,存在证券公司的20000元因证券公司破产不能收回。该企业上述损失影响的营业利润为()元。
人员激励机制的内容包括()。
()是北宋时兴起的一种说唱技艺。洋州(今山西晋城)人孔三传首创,因用若干套不同宫调的曲子轮递歌唱而得名。
最新回复
(
0
)