首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
admin
2013-10-22
48
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image.-libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read ore, or at least buy more—several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things- records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books — have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. 1 can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless, I was brought up by people who had been taught —and who taught me—that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them, 1 should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient—yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
The author was taught the idea that books are______.
选项
A、more cherished by previous people
B、mostly stored in public libraries for free reading
C、luxuries for people when they were young
D、valuable for people to collect and treasure
答案
D
解析
细节归纳题。定位句阐述了作者对传统书籍的看法,即书是有价值的东西,值得喜欢和珍藏。由此可知答案为D)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/7Oc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、California.B、Florida.C、Texas.D、Georgia.B事实细节题。女士介绍BuickCentury的车况,开了四万三千英里,主要是叔叔的岳母每年冬天开车到佛罗里达州跑的里程,因此可知老夫人每年冬天开车去佛罗里达。
Traditionally,thefirstfirmtocommercializeanewtechnologyhasbenefitedfromtheuniqueopportunitytoshapeproductdefin
NomatterhowlargeornotabletheU.S.travelindustryisormaybecome,itwillalwaysbemembersofabroaderworldsociety.
A、Thefamilyandtheschool.B、Theadultsandthemassmedia.C、Thesocietyandtheyoungpeople.D、Theparentsandthekids.C事
A、Hecouldbringsomethingtothewoman.B、He’dbehappytogowiththewoman.C、Hewantsthewomantogethimanewspaper.D、He
A、Todevelopthemselves.B、Togetahigherdegree.C、Tobecomeasuccessfulbusinessman.D、Tomakemoremoney.A事实细节题.短文中提到,研究表明
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledAbilityorDiploma.Youshouldwriteatleast120word
ThepassagegivesanoverallviewoftheIndustrialRevolutionaroundtheworld.Greatchangestookplaceinthesocialaspect
A、Theydonothingbutwatchtheprocess.B、Theytalkaboutthewholethingallthetime.C、Theyfollowthefirstguyjumpingout
A、Askforadviceonmake-up.B、Treatlinesandwrinkles.C、Buyskincareproducts.D、Designacollectionofskincream.C
随机试题
驾驶机动车不能进入红色叉形灯或者红色箭头灯亮的车道。
A.R-S细胞B.火焰状瘤细胞C.花细胞D.多核巨细胞E.异常淋巴样浆细胞多发性骨髓瘤常见
药品所标明的适应证或者功能主治超出规定范围属于
某甲,自年幼时便喜欢打架斗殴。于某日在衣服里揣把尖刀在街上游荡,碰到了与其有前嫌的某乙等四人,由于对方人多,某甲逃跑,但被某乙追上,两人发生斗殴,后某甲怕对方一起上来打死他,便拿出尖刀欲向某乙臀部猛刺后逃走,但不期某乙闪身躲避时刺中腰部,后某甲逃离。某乙被
在审计短期借款项目时,应当结合财务费用项目的审计,测试Q公司本期反映的短期借款利息的整体合理性。以下各项审计程序中,与实现上述审计目标相关的有()。
请根据下面的文字分析《格林童话》对儿童的积极作用。远古时代,当上帝亲自巡视大地时,土地的产量比现在高得多。那时,麦穗不只结五六十粒,而是四五百粒,麦秆从头到脚长满了麦粒,秆有多长,穗就有多长。然而人类是如此的浅俗,他们生活丰裕时,就不再珍惜上苍的
甲女因家庭经济状况不佳,为了赚取生活费,除做人体模特、人体彩绘艺术广告的生意外,还全裸在一个硕大的玻璃鱼缸里做成美人鱼的造型让各路媒体拍照或摄像。乙公司从网上下载了丙拍摄的美人鱼照片进行了精美制作,文字说明为甲女,放在自己公司的宣传橱窗里,引起众多客户驻足
最能代表一个人的人格状况的是()。
Ifyouintendusinghumorinthetalktomakepeoplesmiling,【M1】______youmustknowhowtoidentifysharedexperiencesandpr
ThefirstmentionofslaveryinthestatutesoftheEnglishcoloniesofNorthAmericadoesnotoccuruntilafter1660—somefor
最新回复
(
0
)