首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When, If Ever, Can Museums Sell Their Works? The director of the art-rich yet cash-poor National Academy Museum in New York
When, If Ever, Can Museums Sell Their Works? The director of the art-rich yet cash-poor National Academy Museum in New York
admin
2010-07-24
34
问题
When, If Ever, Can Museums Sell Their Works?
The director of the art-rich yet cash-poor National Academy Museum in New York expected strong opposition when its board decided to sell two Hudson River School paintings for around $15 million.
The director, Carmine Branagan, had already approached leaders of two groups to which the academy belonged about the prospect. She knew that both the American Association of Museums (AAM) and Association of Art Museum Directors (AAMD) had firm policies against museums’ selling off artworks because of financial hardship and were not going to make an exception.
Even so, she said, she was not prepared for the directors group’s immediate response to the sale. In an e-mail message on Dec. 5 to its 190 members, it condemned the academy, founded in 1825, for "breaching one of the most basic and important AAMD’s principles" and called on members "to suspend any loans of works of art to and any collaboration on exhibitions with the National Academy."
Branagan, who had by that time withdrawn her membership from both groups, said she "was shocked by the tone of the letter, like we had committed some crimes." She called the withdrawal of loans "a death knell (丧钟声)" for the museum, adding, "What the AAMD have done is basically shoot us while we’re wounded."
Beyond shaping the fate of any one museum, this exchange has sparked larger questions over a principle that has long seemed sacred. Why, several experts ask, is it so wrong for a museum to sell art from its collection to raise badly-needed funds and now that many institutions are facing financial hardship, should the ban on selling art to cover operating costs be eased?
Lending urgency to the discussion are the efforts of the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles, which has one of the world’s best collections of contemporary art but whose funds is said to have shriveled(萎缩) to $6 million from more than $40 million over the last nine years. Wouldn’t it be preferable, some people asked this month, to sell a Mark Rothko painting or a couple of Robert Rauschenberg’s legendary "combines" -- the museum owns 11 -- than to risk closing its doors. Finally, the museum announced $30 million donations by the billionaire Eli Broad last week that would prevent the sales of any artworks.
Yet defenders of the prohibition warn that such sales can irreparably (不能挽回地) damage an institution. "Selling an object is a knee-jerk (下意识的)act, and it undermines core principles of a museum," said Michael Conforti, president of the directors’ association and director of the Clark Art Institute in Williams-town, Massachusetts. "There are always other options."
The sale of artwork from a museum’s permanent collection, known as deaccessioning(博物馆收藏品等出售), is not illegal in the United States, provided that any terms accompanying the original donation of artwork are respected. In Europe, by contrast, many museums are state-financed and prevented by national law from deaccessioning.
But under the code of ethics of the American Association of Museums, the proceeds should be "used only for the acquisition, preservation, protection or care of collections." The code of the Association of Art Museum Directors is even stricter, specifying that funds should not be used "for purposes other than acquisitions of works of art for the collection."
Dorm Zaretsky, a New York lawyer who specializes in art cases, has sympathized with the National Academy, asking why a museum can sell art to buy more art but not to cover overhead costs or a much-needed education center. "Why should we automatically assume that buying art always justifies a deaccessioning, but that no other use of proceeds -- no matter how important to an institution’s mission--ever can" he wrote.
Even Patty Gerstenblith, a law professor at DePaul University in Chicago known for her strong standpoint on protecting cultural patrimony (祖传的财物), said her position had softened over the years. "If it’s really a life-or-death situation, if it’s a choice between selling a Rauschenberg and keeping the museum doors open, I think there’s some justification for selling the painting," she said.
But several directors drew a much harder line, noting that museums get tax-deductible donations of art and cash to safeguard art collections for the public. Selling off any holdings for profit would thus betray that trust, they say, not to mention robbing a community of art, so no exceptions for financial hardships should be allowed.
It’s a classic slippery slope. This thinking goes: letting one museum sell off two paintings paves the way for dozens of museums to sell off thousands of artworks, perhaps routinely.
Deaccessioning has proven thorny for museums even when the money is directed into accepted channels like acquisitions.
Sometimes the controversy centers on the irreplaceable nature of the object for sale, when Thomas Hoving, then the director of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, began aggressively sorting out its collection in the early 1970s, selling high-profile paintings like Van Gogh’s "Olive Pickers" and Rousseau’s "Tropics". The Metropolitan owned only one other painting by Rousseau, and the resistance was fierce.
Yet critics of strict deaccessioning rules make a public-access argument as well. "Most big museums can’t show 90 percent of the objects they own -- it’s all in storage," said Michael O’Hare, a cultural policy professor at the University of California, Berkeley. "What’s wrong with selling these objects to smaller museums or even private collectors, who are more likely to put them on display?"
At the National Academy, Branagan called deaccessinning an act of last resort, one that she would not have considered without a "long-range financial and programmatic" plan. Branagan said she told her members as much before they voted for the sale -- 181 to 2 in favor -- in November:
"I remember saying: unless you believe you can support sweeping change, then do not vote for deaccessioning," she said. "The tragedy isn’t that we’re going to sell these four pieces. That’s not a tragedy. The tragedy would be if in 10 or 15 years we were back here having the same conversation."
According to some directors, they disagree to sell artworks to ease financial hardships because they consider ______.
选项
A、museums get donations and cash
B、museums sell art collections for the public
C、selling art collections for profit is a robbery
D、selling art collections for profit would betray the public’s trust
答案
D
解析
段末和细节处设题。本题考查一些董事不同意卖艺术品来缓解财政困难的原因。第二句前半句 Selling off any holdings for profit would thus betray that trust(卖掉艺术品来赢利是对公众信任的背叛)与选项 D 符合。因此 D 为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/8IN7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Thereisnodoubtthatadults,andevenhighlyeducatedadults,varygreatlyinthespeedand【B1】______oftheirreading.Some
Theprovisionofsocialcareisamongthemostlabor-intensiveoccupations.BSSocialCarehasexpertsinthefieldandsoisse
A、Heisalreadyattheuniversity.B、Heshouldturnatthegate.C、Heshouldcontinuealongtheroad.D、Hemustpayveryclosea
____________(与古典音乐相反),jazzisnaturalandfree-formandverypopularamongtheyoungpeople.
A、Shehasconfidenceinhim.B、Sheissurprisedatthenews.C、Shehasalsowonascholarship.D、Sheisn’tinterestedinthenew
DepartingforLosAngelesisnoordinary【C1】______whereasforforeignstudentswhoarestartinganewexperiencelivingonthe
A、WaitingforSue’sparentstoarrive.B、Waitingforthecartoberepaired.C、Sight-seeinginChicago.D、VisitingfriendsinIn
AninternationalteamofscientistsisstudyingtheproblemofpollutionanddustinAsia.Onehundredthirtyscientistsfrom
Recently,astudentusedhisPersonalDigitalAssistant(PDA)tofilmafemaleteacherberating(训斥)andtearingtheworkofacl
A、Atabutchershop.B、Atarestaurant.C、Atabookstore.D、Atagrocerystore.B
随机试题
A.肝素B.枸橼酸钠C.EDTA-K2D.草酸铵E.双草酸盐红细胞渗透脆性试验的理想抗凝剂为
A.短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)B.蛛网膜下腔出血C.脑血栓形成D.脑出血E.脑栓塞剧烈运动时,突然出现剧烈头痛,呕吐,口眼歪斜,考虑为
中央一般公共预算支出包括中央本级支出和转移支付,但不包括中央对地方的税收返还。()
牛骨制的梳子
东方公司有一个投资中心,预计今年销售收入为2500万元,营业成本为1520万元,销售及管理费用为500万元,利息费用为30万元,部门平均净经营资产为2500万元。其他资料如下:(1)投资中心要求的税前投资报酬率(等于加权平均税前资本成本)为12%。(2
以下应按照财产转让所得项目征收个人所得税的有()。
教学活动在本质上是一种()
彩虹温泉度假中心委托华正广告公司制作了一块宣传企业形象的广告牌,并由华正广告公司负责安装在度假中心外墙。某日天降暴雨,广告牌被吹落砸伤行人姜某。后查明,广告牌系安装不牢致坠落。关于姜某所受损害的责任承担的说法,正确的是()
在某一存储器系统中,,设有只读存储器10KB,随机存储器54KB,使用16位地址来寻址,其中,只读存储器位于低地址段,其地址范围为()。
ReadthearticlebelowabouttheeffectofthepresenteconomicrecessionintheUnitedStatesonAmericanwomenincontrastto
最新回复
(
0
)