首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
System of Criminal Trial How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it— convi
System of Criminal Trial How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it— convi
admin
2010-01-13
24
问题
System of Criminal Trial
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it— convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so en- grossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"—especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally, this historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S.A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare them themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even slowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
The passage______.
选项
A、questions whether the system of trial by jury can ever be completely efficient
B、suggests a number of reforms which should be made to the legal system of various countries
C、describes how the British legal system works and compares it favourably with other systems
D、compares the legal systems of a number of countries and discusses their advantages and disadvantages
答案
D
解析
综合全文,我们可以看到,文章第一段指出了英国法律制度存在的弊端,第二段谈到英国法律制度的优点,第三段谈到英国法律制度相比法国法律制度存在的利弊,第四、第五段则评述了英美国家法律制度的异同。由此我们可以推断全文的主旨是将几国的法律制度相比较并阐述了他们各自的利弊,因此正确答案应当为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/8JGd777K
本试题收录于:
职称英语综合类基础题库职称英语分类
0
职称英语综合类基础
职称英语
相关试题推荐
Weshouldnotsacrificeenvironmentalprotectionstofostereconomicgrowth.
CanadaIkea:WhateGreetPlaceforYoutoShopTherearemanydifferentstoresthatpeoplegotoinordertobuyvariousho
ParentsintheUnitedStatestendtoasktheirchildrenWhichofthefollowingisNOTtrueofworkingclassAmericans?
Indonesiawasincrisisbecauseofthedrought.Theforestanimalshaven’tbeenaffectedbythesmog.
Tosolvetheproblemofdrymouths,oneisadvisedtotakecoolmilk.Thewriter’sadviceaboutalcoholbeforeyoumakeaspeec
LookafterYourVoiceOftenspeakersatameetingexperiencedrymouthsandaskforaglassofwater.Youcansolvetheproblem
EyeMovementandSeveralFaultsinReadingSupposeyoudothisexperimentwithafriend.Getholdofabookwithalargepag
Duringthepasttenyearstherehavebeendramaticchangesintheinternationalsituation.
ArchiveGallery:TheBestofBionics(仿生学)Humansmightbethemosthighly-evolvedspeciesontheplanet,butmostanimalspo
MadScientistStereotypeOutdatedDopeoplestillimagineaphysicistasabeardedmaninglassesorhastheimageofthema
随机试题
白血病占癌症总发病数的
鉴定厌氧菌用的鉴定试卡是
A.格列吡嗪B.格列本脲C.氯磺丙脲D.二甲双胍E.甲苯磺丁脲易引起乳酸血症的药物是
如果某企业对某种物资的年需求量为3万件,每次订购费用为300元,年保管费用率为20%,订购单价为10元/件,每年的存货日数为260天,则该企业对此物资在一年中的订购次数为()。
关于硬化后混凝土的性能,请回答以下问题。碱集料反应发生的必要条件为()。
对于可撤销合同,具有撤销权的当事人(),撤销权消灭。[2009年真题]
以下关于自理报检单位的权利和义务的表述,错误的是( )。[2007年第一次考试真题]
某企业同时与甲、乙两家保险公司签订了保额分别为200万元和100万元的两份财产基本险合同,对其200万元的固定资产投保,保险有效期内由于火灾保险财产损失150万元。甲、乙保险公司各自应承担的赔款额分别是()。
租赁合同中引起租赁纠纷的主要原因是()。
ThepracticeofpayingchildrenanallowancebecamepopularinAmericaabout100yearsago.Nowadays,Americankidsonaverager
最新回复
(
0
)