首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commerci
admin
2012-10-23
91
问题
Our present generation of cultural critics, arriving after the assault of postmodernism and the increasingly widespread commercialization of culture, has been cast adrift, without any firm basis for judgments. Publications and institutions to support serious criticism, in this view, either no longer exist or are few in number.
Critics today, it is also claimed, are too cozy behind the ivied walls of academe, content to employ a prose style that is decipherable only to a handful of the cognoscente. The deadly dive of university critics into the shallow depths of popular culture, moreover, reveals the unwillingness of these critics to uphold standards. Even if the reasons offered are contradictory, these Jeremiahs huddle around their sad conclusion that serious cultural criticism has fallen into a morass of petty bickering and bloated reputations.
Such narratives of declension, a staple of American intellectual life since the time of the Puritans, are misplaced, self-serving, and historically inaccurate, and difficult to prove. Has the level of criticism declined in the last 50 years? Of course the logic of such an opinion depends on the figures that are being contrasted with one another. Any number of cultural critics thriving today could be invoked to demonstrate. That cultural criticism is alive and well.
But many new and thriving venues for criticism and debate exist today, and they are not limited solely to the discussion of literary works. Actually, they became so encrusted with their own certitude and political judgments that they became largely irrelevant. Today the complaint is that literary culture lacks civility. We live in an age of commercialism and spectacle. Writers seek the limelight, and one way to bask in it is to publish reviews that scorch the landscape, with Dale Peck as the fatuous, but not atypical, case in point. Heidi Julavits, in an essay in The Believer, lamented the downfall of serious fiction and reviewing. She surveyed a literary culture that had embraced "snark", her term for hostile, self-serving reviews.
The snark review, according to Julavits, eschews a serious engagement with literature in favor of a sound-bite approach, an attempt to turn the review into a form of entertainment akin to film reviews or restaurant critiques. A critic found cultural criticism to be in "critical condition". For him, the postmodern turn to, theory, in its questioning of objectivity, cut the critical, independent ground out from under reviewers. The rise of chain bookstores and blockbuster best sellers demeaned literary culture, making it prey to the commercial values of the market and entertainment.
The criticism does not seem discontinuous. Nor should we forget that civility rarely reigned in the circles of New York intellectuals. The art critic Clement Greenberg physically pummeled the theater critic Lionel Abel after Abel rejected the view that Jean Wahl, the French philosopher, was anti-Semitic. Though Robert Peck has the reputation of a literary hatchet man, so far as I know his blows thus far have all been confined to the printed page.
Cultural criticism has certainly changed over the years. The old days of the critic who wielded unchallenged authority have happily passed. Ours is a more pluralistic age, one not beholden to a narrow liter-ary culture. The democratization of criticism — as in the Amazon system of readers’ evaluating books—is a messy affair, as democracy must be. But the solution to the problems of criticism in the present is best not discovered in the musty basements of nostalgia and sentiment for the cultural criticism of a half-century gone. Rather the solution is to recognize, as John Dewey did almost a century ago, that the problems of democracy demand more democracy, less nostalgia for a golden age that never was, and a spirit of openness to what is new and invigorating in our culture.
How do the university critics like the serious cultural criticism?
选项
A、Cultural criticism is not serious enough when the articles are written in the cozy prose style.
B、Popular culture is so prevailing that serious critics are not willing to keep to the shallow standards.
C、Serious cultural criticism is full of insignificant quarrels and the public do not really trust it.
D、Cultural critics have become so serious as to tell the stories imbued with American intellectual Puritanism.
答案
C
解析
推理题。本题的解题点在第二段。题目问:大学的批评家对严肃的文学批评的看法是什么?第二段的最后一句说“…Jeremiahs huddle around their sad conclusion that serious cultural criticism has fallen into a morass of petty bickering and bloated reputations.”可见他们认为严肃的文学批评已经掉入了卑鄙的争执以及浮夸的名声之中,C选项的意思与此句的意思相近,所以正确答案是C选项。其他选项与题目的意思不符,所以是不正确的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/8b9O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Cowriesshellswereonceinwidespreaduseasatokenofvalue.
AnintelligentTVviewermayoccasionallybecomeenragedbythe______argumentationincommercials.
Shewasslatedtopresentanabstractofherthesisatthenationalconvention,andsospenttheholiday______.
Thesmallgroupofonlookerspresentedapatheticsightanddidnothingtohelpthedrowningchild.
Ideally,anatomicalinvestigationconsistsofacombinationofdescriptiveandexperimentalapproaches.Present-dayanatomyinvo
A(Always)sincethecreationofcelluloid,B(plastics)havebeenfoundC(tohave)D(amultitude)ofindustrialandcommercialus
Althoughcriticsdenouncedthefilmassillyandinane,peopleflockedtothetheatertoseeit,guaranteeingitssuccess.
Britain’shopeofagoldmedalintheOlympicGamessuffered______yesterday,whenHunterfailedtoqualifyduringpreliminary
随机试题
下列关于防风的主治错误的是
下列证据中,既属于间接证据又属于原始证据的是哪项?
屠格涅夫是俄国19世纪的()。
A.血中绒毛膜促性腺激素测定B.尿中孕二醇测定C.血中胎盘生乳素测定D.血清中雌二醇测定E.血清中AFP测定下述病例应选哪项检查一早孕妇女,既往流产2次,现又有点滴阴道流血,除上述哪项外均有助于判断能否再次流产
面神经麻痹主要见于
输入期初采购专用发票。2014年12月23日,采购部收到诚康公司开具的专用发票一张,发票号为A003,商品为灭菌器,数量为5台,每台无税单价为1500元,增值税率为17%,货物在途。
下列关于公民权利和义务的说法,错误的是()。
仔细观察下面这幅漫画,给漫画拟定一个标题,并结合自身经历谈谈你的理解。
甲被车撞伤倒地,行人乙拦下一辆出租车,将甲送往医院,乙支付了车费,其间,甲的手机丢失。下列表述中正确的是:
夸美纽斯强调,伦理道德的研究应以()为中心。
最新回复
(
0
)