首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2017-01-15
44
问题
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeep and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants; "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism. " If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U. S. , warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example; "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, And May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings("Smckers die earlier")or esteem-related warnings("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid(病态的)warning on a cigarette label may actually backfire.
Scribbler50, for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou(自以为是的)customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
According to Christian Jarrett, which of the following signs can make a student motivated by self-esteem stop smoking?
选项
A、Cherish Your Health, Stop Smoking
B、Smoking Makes Your Heart Stop Earlier
C、Enjoy a Cigarette, Regret a Whole Life
D、You Look More Charming Without a Cigarette
答案
D
解析
推理题。第五段第六句说明了Christian Jarrett的研究结果:从抽烟中获得自尊心的那些学生,当他们看到与死亡相关的警告和那些与自尊心相关的警告的时候,前者会令他们更加积极地看待吸烟。据此可以推出,[D]“不吸烟,你看上去更有吸引力”是属于与自尊心相关的警示牌,故为正确答案。[A]“珍惜你的健康,停止吸烟”、[B]“吸烟使你更早地死亡”和[C]“享受一支烟,后悔一辈子”均是与死亡有关的警示牌,所以排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/8fJK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
He______unwisely,buthewasatleasttryingtodosomethinghelpful.
Smokingis______inpublicbuildings.
TourismisaboomingbusinessinChina.However,somepeopleworrythattoomanytouristsmaybringharmtotheenvironment,whi
TheyearsoftheAmericanRevolutionwerea(n)______intheUnitedStateshistory.
A:MayIsmokehere?B:Ifyou______,chooseaseatinthesmokingsection.
Smokingissoharmfultohealththatitkills______eachyearthanautomobileaccidents.
Thecampaigntostoppeoplefromsmokingisinfullswing.Theunderlinedpartmeans
Somanytouristspots______thatmostvisitorsrunoutoftimebeforeseeingthemall.
Accordingtothepassage,whomightbeespeciallyinterestedinthenewprogram?
Accordingtothepassage,ifoneenjoyslife,he/sheissuretoprefer______.
随机试题
A.鼓膜紧张部周边和锤骨柄部位的血管扩张B.鼓膜呈珍珠颜色,活动性好,但光锥较短C.锤骨短突突出,光锥消失,锤骨柄向后上移位D.鼓膜充血肿胀,向外膨隆E.耳痛,检查时发现鼓膜上有搏动性闪亮点急性化脓性中耳炎早期的鼓膜改变
下列药物中不属于慢作用抗风湿药的是
影响能量代谢最显著的是
香港华为公司总部设在香港地区,在内地A地设有办事处,并在B地拥有一笔物业。因该公司与内地方圆公司有合同纠纷,被方圆公司诉讼到法院。该合同签订地为C地,并约定于D地履行,但合同现在尚未履行,则有权管辖本案的法院有()。
同步电动机的启动方式有()。
某水工建筑物场地地层2m以内为黏土,2~20m为粉砂,地下水位埋深1.5m,场地地震动峰值加速度为0.2g。在钻孔内深度3m、8m、12m处实测土层剪切波速分别为180m/s、220m/s、260m/s。请用计算说明地震液化初判结果最合理的是下列哪一项?
科学的决策结构不包括()。
商品流通企业对是否要开拓新市场的决策,属于()决策。
资产负债表中“存货”项目的金额,应根据()账户的余额分析填列。
项目经理小李对一个小项目的工期进行估算时,发现开发人员的熟练程度对工期有较大的影响。如果都是经验丰富的开发人员,预计20天可以完成;如果都是新手,预计需要38天;按照公司的平均开发速度,一般26天可以完成。该项目的工期可以估算为(36)天。
最新回复
(
0
)