首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2012-12-30
75
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas (push the fat guy off the bridge) and personalities that were psychopathic. Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve— inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
Which of the following statements is INCORRECT of the experiment?
选项
A、The subject entered a hypnotic state.
B、Similar experiments had been done before.
C、It found out something that is unknown to all.
D、Trolleyology is a technique to analyze utilitarianism.
答案
A
解析
细节题。按照试题顺序及选项中的subject定位至第四段。第四段首句指出“The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage.”,句中的thought experiments意为“思维实验”,不能得出受试者被催眠的结论,故[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/93aO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
HowtoReadEffectivelyManystudentstendtoreadbookswithoutanypurpose.Theyoftenreadabookslowlyandingreatdetail
AbreakthroughintheprovisionofenergyfromthesunfortheEuropeanEconomicCommunity(EEC)couldbebroughtforwardbyup
______isgenerallydefinedasthestudyofmeaningandusuallypaysattentiontothestudyofmeaningoflinguisticunitsthemse
ThecapitalofNewZealandis______.
Theworld’slastknowncaseofsmallpoxwasreportedinSomalia,theHornofAfrica,inOctober1977.Thevictimwasayoungcoo
A、TheTalebancommanderwaskilledinaU.S.-ledcoalitionoperation.B、Manyofjournalistshadinterviewedtheone-leggedTaleb
Who’stoblamefortheapproximately$2agallonmostAmericanspaidforgasolineontheirThanksgivingDaytravels?Toquote
Cultureisoneofthemostchallengingelementsofthenational1.______marketplace.Thissystemoflearnedbehaviorpatternsc
______,writtenbyThomasStearnsEliot,isconsideredtobealandmarkandmodelofEnglishpoetryinthe20thcentury.
______isNOToneof"TheGraveyardPoets".
随机试题
巫从旁望空代祝,唇吻翕辟,不知何词。祝:翕:辟:
对后负荷的叙述,错误的是
下列不属于抗结核药应用原则的是
女性,20岁,晨起时发现神志不清,呼之不应,唇呈樱桃红色,呼吸浅慢,脉搏细数,测COHb浓度>50%.,最可能的诊断是
A.显于风关B.达于气关C.达于命关D.透关射甲E.未超风关病情凶险者,指纹的表现是()
A.药品批准文号B.上市许可的药品C.变更登记D.转正申请E.监测期国务院药品监督管理部门从保护公众健康出发,可以对药品生产企业生产的新药品种设立不超过5年的()
患者,男性,22岁,轻度甲亢,血清T4正常,下列检查有助于诊断的()
世界旅游日为每年的9月27日,这一天恰是南半球旅游旺季刚过去,北半球旅游季节又到来之际。()
在市场经济条件下,企业的管理活动应以市场为导向,以()为最大原则。.
资料:T市整顿“文山会海”现象的工作取得了一定成效,例如节省了会议费用,节省了公务员时间等等,但是出现了矫枉过正的情况,一个关于煤气价格的新闻发布会仅进行了160秒,媒体还没来得及采访就结束了,网友戏称为“史上最短新闻发布会”,媒体对精简会议的标准产生疑问
最新回复
(
0
)