首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2012-12-30
74
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas (push the fat guy off the bridge) and personalities that were psychopathic. Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve— inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr Bartels and Dr Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
Which of the following statements is INCORRECT of the experiment?
选项
A、The subject entered a hypnotic state.
B、Similar experiments had been done before.
C、It found out something that is unknown to all.
D、Trolleyology is a technique to analyze utilitarianism.
答案
A
解析
细节题。按照试题顺序及选项中的subject定位至第四段。第四段首句指出“The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage.”,句中的thought experiments意为“思维实验”,不能得出受试者被催眠的结论,故[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/93aO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
HowtoReadEffectivelyManystudentstendtoreadbookswithoutanypurpose.Theyoftenreadabookslowlyandingreatdetail
HowtoReadEffectivelyManystudentstendtoreadbookswithoutanypurpose.Theyoftenreadabookslowlyandingreatdetail
TheEffectivenessofaPerson1.believethereisnosuchthingas(1),【1】______sothesolutionis(2)whenitisoptimumor
Althoughitmighthavehappenedanywhere,myencounterwiththegreenbananastartedonasteepmountainroadintheinteriorof
ItwassaidbySirGeorgeBernardShawthat"EnglandandAmericaaretwocountriesseparatedbythesamelanguage."Myfirstper
A、CheneyandKerryB、BushandKerryC、CheneyandtheheadofDemocraticPartyD、TheheadsofDemocraticandRepublicpartiesC
______isconsideredtobetheverybeginningoftheAmericanWarofIndependence.
AbreakthroughintheprovisionofenergyfromthesunfortheEuropeanEconomicCommunity(EEC)couldbebroughtforwardbyup
ThoughnottheidealshapeforaChristmasstocking,thisslimlittlevolumecouldneverthelessmakeawelcomeseasonalgift.L
不过,一个人到了四十岁后,在生活中大概都锻炼出宠辱不惊的本事,也不会在乎锦上添花、雪中送炭或落井下石了。那是因为我们已经历过生命的痛苦与挫折,也体验了许多情感的相逢与离散,慢慢地寻索出生命中积极的、快乐的、正向的理念,这种理念,正是“常想一二”。“常想一二
随机试题
管理的最少层次原则要求,一般情况下从高层领导到基层领导较为合适的组织层次是
多层砌体房屋在地震中常出现交叉型斜裂缝,其产生原因是下列哪一个?
某钢结构桥梁项目,业主将桥梁下部结构工程发包给甲施工单位,将钢梁制造、架设工程发包给乙施工单位。业主通过招标选择了某监理单位承担该项目施工阶段的监理任务。监理合同签订后,总监理工程师组建了直线制监理组织机构,并重点提出了质量目标控制措施如下:
以下( )属于我国特殊的货币政策工具。
服务性是商业银行在经营管理上的基本经营方针。()
下面是某求助者MMPI—2的测验结果:临床量表剖面图模式属于()。
小学阶段是发展学生个性()。
戊城中学生最喜欢的节目是( )Y节目最受欢迎的城市是( )
【T1】Fathersexposedtopoisonoussubstancesareprobablyjustaslikelytobethecauseofdefectsintheirunborninfantsasmo
Whyarescientistssurprisedbythefindingsintheirnoisestudy?WhichofthefollowingisTRUEaccordingtothepassage?
最新回复
(
0
)