首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
18
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that ______. ( )
选项
A、many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
B、students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
C、students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
D、many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/95qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Insteadofresearchingandwritingtheirpapers,somestudents______.UsingtheprogramdevelopedatUniversityofCalifornia
Manythings______impossibleinthepastarecommontoday.
Itisastonishingthatapersonofyourintelligence______becheatedsoeasily.
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:TurnOffYourMobilePhone.Youshouldwriteatl
Modernformsoftransportationandcommunicationhavedonemuchto______theisolationoflifeinAlaska.
Itmayalsohaveadditionalinterestandvaluebecauseofitsrelationshiptoahistoricalperiodortosomewell-knownperson.
Personalqualitiesarepersonal______ofanindividual.Thoughskillsareimportant,anemployerwillselectnewemployeesbas
Personalqualitiesarepersonal______ofanindividual.Personalqualitiesarewhatmakeupone’s______.
Althoughheroesmaycomefromdifferentcultures,they______.Accordingtothepassage,heroesarecomparedtohigh-voltagetr
随机试题
甲公司从事房地产开发经营业务,对出租的商品房、土地使用权和商铺均采用成本模式进行后续计量。甲公司的财务经理在复核2×16年度财务报表时,对以下交易或事项会计处理的正确性难以作出判断:(1)1月1日,因商品房滞销,董事会决定将两栋商品房用于出租。1月2
经皮肤采末梢血常用的部位是
判断膀胱破裂的简便方法是
小儿麻痹后遗症产生关节畸形的主要原因为
高度超过100m的高层建筑,其电缆井、管道井应每隔几层在楼板处用相当于耐火极限的不燃烧体作防火分隔?
对钢筋混凝土梁的正截面破坏形式影响最大的是()。
在当前和今后一个时期,中国政治体制改革的目标是()
「機械が動かないんです。」「それじゃ、このボタンを押して()ください。」「あっ、動いた。」
(1)Ricci,45,isnowstrikingoutonperhapshisboldestventureyet.HeplanstomarketanEnglish-languageeditionofhiseleg
Theymayappeartobemarvelsofmodernscience.Buttheideasthatledtothewondersofsatellite【B1】______,organtransplant
最新回复
(
0
)