首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
23
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that ______. ( )
选项
A、many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
B、students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
C、students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
D、many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/95qC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Sheneedssomecomfort,butIreallycan’tthinkofanything______(suit)tosay.
Therestofhislifeis______tothecauseofinternationalexchangeofvisitingscholars.
Carsare【B1】importantpartoflifeintheUnitedStates.Withoutacarmostpeoplefeelthattheyarepoor.Andevenifapers
Inthissixthgradeclassroom,youwouldfind______.Whichyearwouldbeincludedinthe21stCentury?
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisTRUE,accordingtotheauthor?Consideredjudgmentisdifferentfrompersonalpreferencei
Accordingtotheauthor,feelingdepressedis______.Thephenomenonthattoday’schildrenseemadult-likeisattributedbythe
Childrenhaveanatural______(curious)abouttheworldaroundthem.
(Citybornandcitybred),Ihavealwaysregardedthecountryassomethingyoulookatthroughatrainwindow,orsomethingyou
Youarerequiredtowriteacompositiononthefollowingtopicwithin30minutes:CompetitionandCooperationbasedontheoutli
MostpeopleagreethatthepresentroleofwomenhasalreadyaffectedU.S.society.______,ithasaffectedthetraditionalro
随机试题
简述我国新闻单位领导体制的基本类型。
患者,女,30岁,已婚。孕后腰酸腹痛,胎动下坠,伴阴道少量出血,头晕耳鸣,小便频数,舌淡苔白,脉沉细滑。治疗应首选
做好农民工工作的基本原则是()。
为了更好地理解人类个性的特征及其发展,一些心理学家对动物的个性进行了研究。以下各项如果为真,都能对上述行为提供解释,除了()。
addition
社会主义时期民族问题的实质是
以下描述中,错误的是()。
在考生文件夹下,打开文档WORD2.docx,按照要求完成下列操作并以该文件名(WORD2.docx)保存文档。【文档开始】【文档结束】(1)将表格上端的标题文字设置成三号、仿宋、加粗、居中;计算表格中各学生的平均成绩。
Somepeoplemakeyoufeelcomfortablewhentheyarearound.Thesepeoplehavesomethingincommon.Andonceweknowwhatitisw
A、Positive.B、Negative.C、Indifferent.D、Ambiguous.B
最新回复
(
0
)