首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downi
Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downi
admin
2016-08-19
51
问题
Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downing Street Strategy Unit who take an interest in"social capital". At intervals they go around asking people in assorted nations the question: "Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted?"
The results are fascinating. The conclusion that leaps from the figures and into sensational headlines is that social dislocation, religious decline, public scandals, family fragmentation and the fear of crime have made us less trusting. Comparative surveys over 40 years suggest that British trustfulness has halved: in the 1950s 60 percent of us answered "yes, most people can be trusted" ,in the 1980s 44 percent, today only 29 percent. Trust levels also continue to fall in Ireland and the U. S. —meanwhile, the Norwegians, Swedes, Danes and Dutch express tremendous confidence in one another’s probity: levels are actually rising. And the Palme d’Or for paranoid mutual suspicion goes to the Brazilians—with less than 3 percent replying "yes"—and the Turks with 6. 5 percent. The French, apparently, never trusted one another and still don’t. So we become less Scandinavian and more French(or Turkish) every year.
Regarding Britain, the obvious conclusions are being drawn. Mr. Halpern and others cite reasons why we appear less trustful: the demise of the job-for-life culture, rising divorce, physical mobility, higher immigration, an aggressive commercial ethic and the new isolation of mass media. " You use your wealth to free yourself of the inconvenience of other people," says Halpern. " You ensure you have your own house, and you don’t even have to watch TV with your family because you have five TVs. "
This is useful research, but there are a few caveats. The trouble is that you may not get a very thoughtful answer if you merely ask—as they did last year—whether " generally speaking, most people can be trusted". For the British like to think of themselves as canny, savvy, nobody’s fools. We have a powerful culture of satire and a hypercritical media which gleefully splash news of every private and public betrayal, however trivial. In our fantasy life we court paranoia, lapping up crime thrillers and spy novels. We are fascinated by rogues, from Chaucer’s Pardoner to Del Boy. We are bad at risk-assessment, and repeated surveys show that we fear crime far more than is justified.
So we are conditioned to claim that we don’t trust people much. A Scandinavian or Dutchman is proud to express trust and affection for his fellow-man(I have just been sailing on a Dutch ship for a fortnight and the prevailing open-heartedness makes any Briton feel like Scrooge). Our national preference is to purse the lips, shake the head and affect an air of judicious canniness.
But if you look at the actual daily workings of British society there is an astonishing degree of unquestioning trust of strangers, simply because we are a technological society. These respondents who tell the researchers that "generally speaking, people cannot be trusted"are in fact blithely trusting distant strangers all day long. Every time you get on a train or plane you put your life into the hands of unseen engineers and designers, drivers, pilots and traffic controllers. When you give a password to a bank call centre you are displaying trust: tapping your credit-card number on to an Internet site, you affirm the rectitude of a company you have never seen, and rely on the conscientiousness of distant software designers. The list of our trustful ways goes on and on. Twenty minutes’ contemplation of the simple scams uncovered by the BBC Watchdog should suggest that rather than living in a state of constant suspicion, in many areas of life we are relaxed to the point of gullibility.
But ask the bald question, and we think immediately about those who publicly let us down: politicians who broke election promises, pension funds that jeopardized our future while their directors swanned off with bonuses, stars who turned sleazy. This is not entirely healthy. What we say will, in the end, become what we think. U. S. evidence is denser than ours, but broadly speaking it is clear that trust is linked to "social capital"—networks, alliances, local societies, anything that takes people out into common spaces. There is much discussion in the English-speaking nations about how to "rebuild" social capital, but I was glad to see that the 2002 report was extremely cautious about the ability of policy-makers to change things. The last thing we need is nagging. I also much enjoyed its worried little digression into the negative side of social capital—old-boy networks, micro-communities that exclude outsiders, ethnic ghettos, and so forth.
Mr. Halpern’s book will come to more informed conclusions than I can: but my own instinct, from the research and from observation, is to draw only two. First, we’re not quite as cynical as we say we are, and nothing like as cynical as our media. Secondly, the worst crisis of trust is not actually between citizens, but between citizens and their government and institutions. The remedy for that is in the hands of politicians, who ought to police their own ambition and greed and that of their corporate friends. Interference from the top is a lousy idea. Example from the top would be much better.
Which of the following statements about Scandinavians or Britons is INCORRECT?
选项
A、Scandinavians are generally frank and open.
B、Britons are reluctant to show hospitality.
C、Britons pretend to be shrewd.
D、Britons prefer satirical art.
答案
B
解析
细节题。第五段第二句指出,斯堪的纳维亚人或荷兰人乐于对他的同胞表示信任友爱,并引以为豪。故[A]正确;第四段第四句指出,我们有强大的讽刺文化和吹毛求疵的媒体,他们愉快地大篇幅报道任何一次涉及私人或公众的欺骗背叛。故[D]正确;第五段末句指出,而我们英国人更喜欢撅撅嘴、摇摇头,假装精明机智。故[C]正确;文章没有提及[B],故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9C7O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Whowasthebestpresident?ThatwecanevenaskthequestionisthankstoGeorgeWashingtonwhoshapedtheroleonhisown【M1】
Whowasthebestpresident?ThatwecanevenaskthequestionisthankstoGeorgeWashingtonwhoshapedtheroleonhisown【M1】
______istheauthorofWalden,orLifeintheWoods,amajorworkofAmericanTranscendentalism.
HistoricallyHispanicgroupshavehadgreatinfluenceontheUnitedStates.TheyaremainlyfromthefollowingcountriesEXCEPT_
______isarepresentativefigureoftheAmericanlocalcolourism.
Historianshaveonlyrecentlybeguntonotetheincreaseindemandforluxurygoodsandservicestookplaceineighteenth-centur
Historianshaveonlyrecentlybeguntonotetheincreaseindemandforluxurygoodsandservicestookplaceineighteenth-centur
"Ifwintercomes,canspringbefarbehind?"isanepigrammaticlineby______
OnaLosAngelesstreetcornerin2000,Iwasthe"insideman"inaclassiccongamecalledthepigeondrop.AmagiciannamedDa
Itisasuccessinsofarasmorewomenretaintheiryouthfulappearancetoagreateragethaninthepast."Oldladies"area
随机试题
刑事诉讼参与人有哪些?
患者在家燃烧煤气取暖突然昏倒,面色潮红,口唇呈樱桃红色,脉快,多汗,神志不清伴发热。确诊的首选检查是
女,60岁,排便习惯改变半年,大便次数增多,有时带脓性黏液,偶尔混有血液,便后不适。最可能的诊断是
下列各选项中属于慢性肾炎的临床特点是
用冷凝法净化有机废气时,通过( )措施可以提高净化效果。
根据《中华人民共和国政府采购法》,下列情形中不适宜采用单一来源方式采购工程咨询服务的是()。
监理单位投标书的核心内容是( )。
许多成语源于我国古代著名的历史故事。下列成语故事发生在战国时期的是:
谋杀:当一个人不但企图造成另一个人的死亡,而且也造成了这个人的死亡,或是由于一个人的行为,明明知道其正做着一件可能造成另外的人被杀死的危险的事情,其仍然不顾别人生命而继续实施造成他人死亡。根据以上的定义,下面哪种行为是典型的谋杀:( )。
NewresearchfromAustraliasupportsthebeliefthatmanypetownershave—itshowsthatpetsaregoodforyourhealth.The【C1】
最新回复
(
0
)