首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downi
Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downi
admin
2016-08-19
52
问题
Whom can you trust these days? It is a question posed by David Halpern of Cambridge University, and the researchers at the Downing Street Strategy Unit who take an interest in"social capital". At intervals they go around asking people in assorted nations the question: "Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted?"
The results are fascinating. The conclusion that leaps from the figures and into sensational headlines is that social dislocation, religious decline, public scandals, family fragmentation and the fear of crime have made us less trusting. Comparative surveys over 40 years suggest that British trustfulness has halved: in the 1950s 60 percent of us answered "yes, most people can be trusted" ,in the 1980s 44 percent, today only 29 percent. Trust levels also continue to fall in Ireland and the U. S. —meanwhile, the Norwegians, Swedes, Danes and Dutch express tremendous confidence in one another’s probity: levels are actually rising. And the Palme d’Or for paranoid mutual suspicion goes to the Brazilians—with less than 3 percent replying "yes"—and the Turks with 6. 5 percent. The French, apparently, never trusted one another and still don’t. So we become less Scandinavian and more French(or Turkish) every year.
Regarding Britain, the obvious conclusions are being drawn. Mr. Halpern and others cite reasons why we appear less trustful: the demise of the job-for-life culture, rising divorce, physical mobility, higher immigration, an aggressive commercial ethic and the new isolation of mass media. " You use your wealth to free yourself of the inconvenience of other people," says Halpern. " You ensure you have your own house, and you don’t even have to watch TV with your family because you have five TVs. "
This is useful research, but there are a few caveats. The trouble is that you may not get a very thoughtful answer if you merely ask—as they did last year—whether " generally speaking, most people can be trusted". For the British like to think of themselves as canny, savvy, nobody’s fools. We have a powerful culture of satire and a hypercritical media which gleefully splash news of every private and public betrayal, however trivial. In our fantasy life we court paranoia, lapping up crime thrillers and spy novels. We are fascinated by rogues, from Chaucer’s Pardoner to Del Boy. We are bad at risk-assessment, and repeated surveys show that we fear crime far more than is justified.
So we are conditioned to claim that we don’t trust people much. A Scandinavian or Dutchman is proud to express trust and affection for his fellow-man(I have just been sailing on a Dutch ship for a fortnight and the prevailing open-heartedness makes any Briton feel like Scrooge). Our national preference is to purse the lips, shake the head and affect an air of judicious canniness.
But if you look at the actual daily workings of British society there is an astonishing degree of unquestioning trust of strangers, simply because we are a technological society. These respondents who tell the researchers that "generally speaking, people cannot be trusted"are in fact blithely trusting distant strangers all day long. Every time you get on a train or plane you put your life into the hands of unseen engineers and designers, drivers, pilots and traffic controllers. When you give a password to a bank call centre you are displaying trust: tapping your credit-card number on to an Internet site, you affirm the rectitude of a company you have never seen, and rely on the conscientiousness of distant software designers. The list of our trustful ways goes on and on. Twenty minutes’ contemplation of the simple scams uncovered by the BBC Watchdog should suggest that rather than living in a state of constant suspicion, in many areas of life we are relaxed to the point of gullibility.
But ask the bald question, and we think immediately about those who publicly let us down: politicians who broke election promises, pension funds that jeopardized our future while their directors swanned off with bonuses, stars who turned sleazy. This is not entirely healthy. What we say will, in the end, become what we think. U. S. evidence is denser than ours, but broadly speaking it is clear that trust is linked to "social capital"—networks, alliances, local societies, anything that takes people out into common spaces. There is much discussion in the English-speaking nations about how to "rebuild" social capital, but I was glad to see that the 2002 report was extremely cautious about the ability of policy-makers to change things. The last thing we need is nagging. I also much enjoyed its worried little digression into the negative side of social capital—old-boy networks, micro-communities that exclude outsiders, ethnic ghettos, and so forth.
Mr. Halpern’s book will come to more informed conclusions than I can: but my own instinct, from the research and from observation, is to draw only two. First, we’re not quite as cynical as we say we are, and nothing like as cynical as our media. Secondly, the worst crisis of trust is not actually between citizens, but between citizens and their government and institutions. The remedy for that is in the hands of politicians, who ought to police their own ambition and greed and that of their corporate friends. Interference from the top is a lousy idea. Example from the top would be much better.
Which of the following statements about Scandinavians or Britons is INCORRECT?
选项
A、Scandinavians are generally frank and open.
B、Britons are reluctant to show hospitality.
C、Britons pretend to be shrewd.
D、Britons prefer satirical art.
答案
B
解析
细节题。第五段第二句指出,斯堪的纳维亚人或荷兰人乐于对他的同胞表示信任友爱,并引以为豪。故[A]正确;第四段第四句指出,我们有强大的讽刺文化和吹毛求疵的媒体,他们愉快地大篇幅报道任何一次涉及私人或公众的欺骗背叛。故[D]正确;第五段末句指出,而我们英国人更喜欢撅撅嘴、摇摇头,假装精明机智。故[C]正确;文章没有提及[B],故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9C7O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Manytypically"American"characteristicsarearesultofvalue.【M1】______ThereisaremarkableethicdiversityintheUS.Amo
Manytypically"American"characteristicsarearesultofvalue.【M1】______ThereisaremarkableethicdiversityintheUS.Amo
ShoppinghabitsintheUnitedStateshavechangedinthelastquarterofthe20thcentury.Earlyinthe1900s,mostAmericant
Mostpeoplehavetypewritersandcantypewellprefertotype【M1】______theirlettersnowadays.Therewasafeelingageneratio
Whowasthebestpresident?ThatwecanevenaskthequestionisthankstoGeorgeWashingtonwhoshapedtheroleonhisown【M1】
Weoftenreadinnovelshowaseeminglyrespectablepersonorfamilyhassometerriblesecretwhichhasbeenconcealedfromstr
IwasupthenextmorningbeforetheOctobersunrise,andawaythroughthewildandthewoodland.Therisingofthesunwasnobl
IthoughtthatitwasaSundaymorninginMay,thatitwasEasterSunday,andasyetveryearlyinthemorning.
PASSAGEFOURIntheletterlyingonatable,whatdidtheladywrite?
In1751,SwedishbotanistCarolusLinnaeuscameupwiththenovelideaofusingflowersasclocks.Morninggloriesopentheirtr
随机试题
下列哪一项是产品成本形成之后的综合分析与考核活动【】
慢性肾盂肾炎脾肾两虚,湿浊缠绵型治宜
张某打算自己投资设立一企业从事商贸业务。下列哪一选项是错误的?(卷三2007年真题试卷第31题)
物流信息化规划的原则有先进性、完善性、实用性、扩充性和()。
近年来,党和政府在公共财政覆盖农村方面做了几件大事:全面取消农业税,免除农村义务教育学杂费,建立新型农村医疗制度,建立新型农村社会养老机制,深受广大农民群众的欢迎,他们称之为“种地不交税,上学不付费,看病不太贵,养老不犯愁”。这些事实,体现了()。
关于“给我一打健全的儿童,一个由我支配的环境,我可以保证,无论这些儿童的祖先如何,我都可以把他们培养成为任何一种人,或者是政治家、军人、律师,抑或是乞丐、盗贼。”和“一两遗传胜过一吨环境”中的两句话表述错误的是
8250除数寄存器的值用于确定通信波特率,它必须在8250初始化时预置。为此,应先把通信线控制寄存器的【 】置为1,然后将除数寄存器的值写入高8位除数寄存器和低8位除数寄存器。
HowtoDoWellonaJobInterviewAtypicalinterview—confusing,humiliating,andnerve-racking—【T1】______inthesameroomw
Moderntheatreaudiencesarelessabletounderstandclassicalplaysthanpreviousgenerationsbecauseofadecliningknowledge
A、Theyrelyheavilyontheirownimagination.B、Theyhaveexperiencessimilartothecharacters’.C、Theylookattheworldina
最新回复
(
0
)