首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Despite decades of scientific research, no one yet knows how much damage human activity is doing to the environment. Humans are
Despite decades of scientific research, no one yet knows how much damage human activity is doing to the environment. Humans are
admin
2016-01-30
50
问题
Despite decades of scientific research, no one yet knows how much damage human activity is doing to the environment. Humans are thought to be responsible for a whole host of environmental problems, ranging from global warming to ozone depletion. What is not in doubt, however, is the devastating effect humans are having on the animal and plant life of the planet.
Currently, an estimated 50, 000 species become extinct every year. If this carries on, the impact on all living creatures is likely to be profound, says Dr. Nick Middleton, a geographer at Oxford University. " All species depend in some way on each other to survive. And the danger is that, if you remove one species from this very complex web of interrelationships, you have very little idea about the knock-on effects on the ecosystem. So, if you lose a key species, you might cause a whole cascade of other extinctions. "
Complicating matters is the fact that there are no obvious solutions to the problem. Unlike global warming and ozone depletion — which, if the political will was there, could be reduced by cutting gas emissions — preserving biodiversity remains an intractable problem.
The latest idea is " sustainable management" , which is seen as a practical and economical way of protecting species from extinction. This means humans should be able to use any species of animal or plant for their benefit, provided enough individuals of that species are left alive to ensure its continued existence.
For instance, instead of depending on largely ineffective laws against poaching, it gives local people a good economic reason to preserve plants and animals. In Zimbabwe, there is a sustainable management project to protect elephants. Foreign tourists pay large sums of money to kill these animals for sport. This money is then given to the inhabitants of the area where the hunting takes place. In theory, locals will be encouraged to protect elephants, instead of poaching them — or allowing others to poach them — because of the economic benefit involved.
This sounds like a sensible strategy, but it remains to be seen whether it will work. With corruption endemic in many developing countries, some observers are skeptical that the money will actually reach the people it is intended for. Others wonder how effective the locals will be at stopping poachers.
There are also questions about whether sustainable management is practical when it comes to protecting areas of great biodiversity such as the world’s tropical forests. In theory, the principle should be the same as with elephants — allow logging companies to cut down a certain number of trees, but not so many as to completely destroy the forest.
Sustainable management of forests requires controls on the number of trees which are cut down, as well as investment in replacing them. But because almost all tropical forests are located in countries which desperately need revenue from logging, there are few regulations to do this. Moreover, unrestricted logging is so much more profitable that wood prices from managed forests would cost up to five times more — an increase that consumers, no matter how "green" , are unlikely to pay.
For these reasons, sustainable management of tropical forests is unlikely to become widespread in the near future. This is disheartening news. It’s estimated these forests contain anything from 50 to 90 percent of all animal and plant species on Earth. In one study of a five-square-kilometer area of rain forest in Peru, for instance, scientists counted 1, 300 species of butterflies and 600 species of birds. In the entire continental United States, only 400 species of butterflies and 700 species of birds have been recorded.
Scientist professor Norman Myers sees this situation as a gigantic "experiment we’re conducting with our planet". "We don’t know what the outcome will be. If we make a mess of it, we can’t move to another planet ... It’s a case of one planet, one experiment. "
What damage do we know for sure is human activity doing to the environment?
选项
A、Global warming.
B、Ozone depletion.
C、Species extinction.
D、All of the above.
答案
D
解析
细节判断题。根据原文首段第二句中的global warming,ozone depletion判断选项A、B正确;根据原文第二段首句species become extinct every year可知选项C正确。故答案为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9IGO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Englishremainsadominantanduniversallanguage,whichpresently【51】asaconnection-linkbetweengreatvarietiesofdif
AfricanAmericanwomen’ssearchforsocietalacceptanceoftenencompassesstrugglebetweennaturalandsociallyconstructedidea
NexttoSirAndrewintheclub-roomsitsCaptainSentry,agentlemanofgreatcourage,goodunderstanding,butinvinciblemodest
Accordingto______acrosstherelevantresearchcommunity,thepublishedattackrepresentsanextremepositioninitsdemandsfor
Businessandgovernmentleadersalsoconsidertheinflationratetobeanimportantgeneralindicator.Inflationisaperiodof
Mostofustellonetwoliesaday,accordingtoscientistswhostudythesethings.Andwerarelygetcaught,becausetheliesw
Eighttimeswithinthepastmillionyears,somethingintheEarth’sclimaticequationhaschanged,allowingsnowinthemountain
SoonafterBeijinggraduatestudentGangDong-chunlandedinTaiwanlastyeartoresearchitspoliticaldevelopment,theUnited
Duringthelastthirtyyears,theinternationaleconomyhasexperiencedabasicchange.ImprovementsintheInternetandotherc
Publicspeakingfillsmostpeoplewithdread.Humiliationisgreatestfear;self-exposureandfailingtoappealtotheaudience
随机试题
硝酸具有酸的通性,能与活波金属反应放出氢气。()
票据诈骗罪的客观方面表现为()。
有线电报和电话在19世纪末相继问世后,赫兹又证明了电磁波的存在,意大利人马可尼在此基础上利用极为简陋的装置进行短距离无线电报试验取得成功。但在当时,人们认为电磁波是直线传输的,由于地理扁率影响,长距离传送信号是不可能的。马可尼经过多次试验,于1910年12
某班级中很多学生学习成绩差,思想品德差,班集体意识差,同学之间几乎没有合作行为,大部分人都不知道该做什么,怎么做,这个班级的班主任所采取的领导方式最可能是()。
我国国家主席、副主席任期()年。
稻草人谬误是指反驳者在没有任何证据或推理可用时,偷换对方的论点,然后把这个论点当作是对方的论点并加以推翻的一种逻辑错误。根据上述定义,下列反驳中存在稻草人谬误的是:
陈桥兵变
下列一台Catalyst4000显示交换表的命令及对应的显示信息均正确的是()。
努力乃其实质。除了征服须毕生为之努力的困难外,没有任何快乐可言。诚如叶芝所言,除了不可为的事情外,我们一生所获得的满足有多大,取决于我们所选择的困难有多强。罗伯特•弗罗斯特在谈及“承受痛苦时的快乐”时,其意相近。社会上宣扬的那种幸福观的致命缺陷就在于声称幸
ScienceFiction?NotAnyMoreSciencefictionhasoftenbeenthesourceofinspirationfornewtechnologies.Theexoskeleton
最新回复
(
0
)