首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For more than 600 years people have complained that youngsters cannot write proper English anymore. Two universal truths emerge:
For more than 600 years people have complained that youngsters cannot write proper English anymore. Two universal truths emerge:
admin
2018-08-14
60
问题
For more than 600 years people have complained that youngsters cannot write proper English anymore. Two universal truths emerge: languages are always changing, and older people always worry that the young are not taking proper care of the language.
The problem is that conservatism works differently on writing than it does on speech. Writing is more permanent, so people choose their words carefully and conservatively. It is slow and considered, so people can avoid new usages widely seen as mistakes. It is taught carefully by adults to children, which naturally has some conservative influence on the written language. And it is often edited, so a young journalist with a casual style may well be edited to a more traditional one by an older editor.
Speech is different: instead of permanent, slow, considered and taught, it is impermanent, fast, and learned naturally by children from their surroundings. Speech will— at almost any level of language conservatism—change faster than written language.
In this imperfect world, then, written language only partly reflects speech. Younger writers introduce spoken or new words or usages into their writing, annoying their elders as they do. But no one dare to be casual in spelling: English-speakers are stuck with an ancient system. Liberties with grammar—making the written language look like the spoken one— should be few and cautious. Giving the written language a little room to change, but not too much, is the only way to enjoy the best of both stability and vitality. The alternative— perfectly conservative writing—will make writing less and less like the language future generations will speak, and thus less relevant to writing about the world they live in.
Which of the following will the author probably agree with?
选项
A、New usages should be forbidden in speech.
B、Language change is fine, but shouldn’t be too much.
C、Language change is inevitable but annoying.
D、Changes in writing should keep in pace with speech.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9KCO777K
0
成人本科学位英语
相关试题推荐
Photosthatyoumighthavefounddownthebackofyoursofaarenowbigbusiness!In2005,theAmericanartistRichardPrinc
Therearetwotypesofpeopleintheworld.Althoughtheyhaveequaldegreeofhealthandwealthandothercomfortsoflife,one
Thecoursewould(havebeenoffered)thisterm,butit(cancelled)becausetoofewstudentshad(registered)beforeregistration
Weallknowthatitispossibleforordinarypeopletomaketheirhomesontheequator(赤道),althoughoftentheymayfeeluncomf
Weallknowthatitispossibleforordinarypeopletomaketheirhomesontheequator(赤道),althoughoftentheymayfeeluncomf
Iwasgivingatalktoalargegroupofpeople,thesametalkI______tohalfadozenothergroups.
Amancannotsmilelikeachild,______achildsmileswithhiseyes,whileamansmileswithhislipsalone.
Themostimportantthingtodo______thepollutionassoonaspossible.
Thedeclineinmoralstandards—whichhaslongconcernedsocialanalysts—hasatlastcapturedtheattentionofaverageAmericans.
随机试题
简述格式条款的概念与特点。
急性白血病应用COAP方案化疗中,出现血尿,应首先考虑
越鞠丸可治六郁,方中何以不用祛痰药?
职工因工致残被鉴定为1级伤残,下述选项中符合《工伤保险条例》规定的有()。
中央文化体制改革工作领导小组办公室主任孙志军表示,我国高度重视中华文化“走出去”,以丰富世界各国对中华文化的更多了解,促进国际之间的交流与合作,让世界各国能够了解一个真实的、积极发展的、倡导世界和平的中国。中华文化“走出去”有利于()。
根据《中华人民共和国中国人民银行法》的规定,我国货币政策的最终目标是(),并以此促进经济增长。
阅读下列材料,结合相关法律规定,回答问题。甲因情感纠葛与同事乙发生争执,将乙打伤。事后,甲所在的事业单位对其作出开除公职的处分,并移交司法机关处理。法院依据《中华人民共和国刑法》的认定,甲的行为构成犯罪,判处甲有期徒刑一年,缓期两年执行,并赔偿乙
请在【答题】菜单下选择【进入考生文件夹】命令,并按照题目要求完成下面的操作。注意:以下的文件必须都保存在考生文件夹下。文档“北京政府统计工作年报.docx”是一篇从互联网上获取的文字资料,请打开该文档并按下列要求进行排版及保存操作:在封面页与正文之
Whenitcomestotheslowingeconomy,EllenSperoisn’tbitinghernailsjustyet.Butthe47-year-oldmanicuristisn’tcutting,
Inthissection,youaregoingtoreadapassagewithtenstatementsattachedtoit.Eachstatementcontainsinformationgiveni
最新回复
(
0
)