首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Bill Clinton wrestles with the complexities of his economic plan, a surprising trend that could ultimately make life a lot easie
Bill Clinton wrestles with the complexities of his economic plan, a surprising trend that could ultimately make life a lot easie
admin
2012-01-05
55
问题
Bill Clinton wrestles with the complexities of his economic plan, a surprising trend that could ultimately make life a lot easier for the new president may be developing. A handful of analysts believe that technology is beginning to help improve productivity in the service sector, If they are right, middle-class living standards which have stagnated for the past 20 years could start to improve.
The service sector gets little attention in most popular discussions of America’s economic problems. Manufacturing, where US workers go head-to-head with foreign competitors, is supposed to be the crucial area; services, which are mostly sheltered from international competition, are regarded as secondary at best. If anything, the growth of the service sector is seen as a symptom of our manufacturing decline, as steelworkers lose their high-paying jobs and become minimum-wage hamburger flippers. But serious analysts know that it is our performance in services not manufacturing that is the bigger economic problem.
In fact, US manufacturing performed reasonably well during the 1980s, with productivity growing at 2.9% per year. That was almost as fast as manufacturing productivity grew during the "good years" in 1950s and 1960s, and it was taster than productivity growth in most other advanced countries. So why didn’t we feel better? Because near stagnation in service productivity-growth at only about 1.0% annually-held our living standard down.
Dominant service sector. The truth is that modern America is primarily a service economy. Currently, 70% of US workers are in the service sector, versus only 20% in manufacturing. If we could eliminate our persistent trade deficits in manufacturing, the prosperity would shift, but only slightly: A rough estimate is that completely eliminating our current trade deficit would raise the share of manufacturing in employment by only about 0.5%. In other word, like it or not, most Americans will work in the service sector for the foreseeable future. That means, in turn, that the productivity of the US work force as a whole depends mostly on the productivity of service workers.
But it is really possible to raise service productivity? Some service jobs, like housecleaning and hair cutting, seem resistant to technological change at least until we learn to build robot maids and barbers. In the past, however, we have seen major improvements in service productivity. During the 1950s and 1960s, for example, a linked set of technological and social changes-widespread availability Of private ears and home refrigerators, the growth of supermarkets and an improved road system-led to huge increases in retail productivity. An earlier era saw a surge in office productivity because of such revolutionary innovations as typewriters, carbon paper and vertical file cabinets. Indeed the most significant American business success story of the late 20th century may well be Wal-Mart, which has applied extensive computerization and home-grown version of Japan’s "just-in-time" inventory methods to revolutionize retailing.
Analysts like Stephen Roach of Morgan Stanley now believe that additional productivity gains in the office are possible. Computers, it seems, are finally being used to eliminate paperwork: back offices are shrinking, and corporate hierarchies are getting flatter. If you squint, you can see these micro changes starting to show up in the macro numbers. We are now officially a year and a half into an economic recovery, yet unemployment remains stubbornly high. One of the reasons for this lingering joblessness is that productivity is rising faster than expected, primarily in the service sector. If America eventually returns to full employment, the total economy could be bigger and more productive.
Technology investment is helping to fuel these changes. Preliminary data show that while overall investment in this recovery is weak by historical standards, computer-related investment is soaring. It looks as if the service sector has decided that it now really knows how to make information technology work.
Like any radical change, the coming revolution in service productivity will have its victims. Skilled weavers were impoverished by the power loom, and small food stores were savaged by the rise of the supermarket. This time, it’s the middle managers who will lose. The past recession took an unprecedented toll of skilled, white-collar workers, and many of these jobs may never come back. But most of America could benefit from rising service productivity in the 1990s and that would be welcome news for Bill Clinton.
At present investors like to venture their money in all of the following EXCEPT ______.
选项
A、information technology
B、manufacturing industries
C、the service industry
D、computer related products
答案
B
解析
文章通篇都在讲手工业的发展已经越来越多的被服务业和信息业所替代,所以投资商投资手工业的可能性也逐渐减小了。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9Nua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
AfricanEconomicCommunity
Sino-UScomprehensiveeconomicdialogue
microeconomicphenomenon
Writeacompositionoflessthan400wordsonthegiventopicbelow.China’sEnvironmentChallengedbyRapidEconomicGrowth
WriteanEnglishreportof250-300wordsdescribingtheworldeconomicpyramidaccordingtothefollowingchartandgiveyourow
Wewillbelosingmoneythisyearunlessthatneweconomicplanofyours______miracle.
Therearerumorsofaneconomicmenacefromthedairycooperatives.
BillClintonwrestleswiththecomplexitiesofhiseconomicplan,asurprisingtrendthatcouldultimatelymakelifealoteasie
随机试题
HardlyhadIarrivedattheoffice________themeetingbegan.
口腔有绿脓杆菌感染时应选用口臭病人可选用
风险管理最根本的动力来源是()
银行从业人员必须做到“廉洁奉公,不谋私利”,以下各种行为中不属于这一范畴的是()。
在一般情况下,政府实施最高限价可能产生的结果或问题有()。
关于总量性货币失衡的说法,正确的是()。
甲于2011年3月20日将小件包裹寄存乙处保管。3月22日,该包裹被盗。3月27日,甲取包裹时得知包裹被盗。根据《民法通则》的规定,甲要求乙赔偿损失的诉讼时效期间届满日是()。
设其中选取参数λ,使得,在区域D={(x,y)|y>0|内与路径无关;
UnpopularSubjects?Isthereaplaceintoday’ssocietyforthestudyofuselesssubjectsinouruniversities?Justover100
因为是大宗定货,我接受你提出的8.5美元的价格。然而,那是非常便宜的价格,我们几乎无利可图。
最新回复
(
0
)