首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the
admin
2015-09-26
40
问题
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the vocabulary and grammar we use reflects and reinforces a traditional view of the world as one in which men are dominant and women play a secondary role.
Take the word "chairman", for example. While this can in fact apply to people of both sexes, it appears to some people to be male-oriented as it ends in "man". In the past people taking the role of chairman were exclusively male, and the word was obviously originally a compound of "chair" and "man". Many English speakers, however, have ceased to view this word as a compound and no more feel it to be composed of two units, "chair" and "man", than they perceive "cupboard" as composed of "cup" and "board". In addition the continued use of chairman might be defended on the grounds that the final syllable is pronounced /m’n/ rather than / m
n/, just like the final syllable of woman. Despite such considerations other speakers take a contrary view and are sensitive to the components of which it is made up. They clearly perceive it as a title which perpetuates traditional ideas about the place of women in society. For this reason they seek to replace it with neutral terms such as "chairperson" or "chair" , so that it is now possible to ask questions such as: "Who is chair of the committee?"
Other changes advocated include the replacement of words such as "postman", "fireman" and "policeman" with more clearly neutral terms such as "postal worker", "fire-fighter" and "police officer". There is, however, continuing controversy about how far such language changes should go. Should changes also be considered to traditional idioms such as "man in the street" and titles such as "Peking Man"? What about those words where the male meaning of "man" is no longer dominant, such as "manhandle"?
To the extent that changes have taken place, they have done so more in the written language and formal pronouncements than in everyday speech. You would be quite likely to read in the paper that "Postal workers are to receive a pay increase". But "Has the postman been?" would be most likely to be heard in informal conversation. Here "postman" remains firmly entrenched in popular usage.
The lack of a sex-neutral third-person singular in English has also attracted attention. How, for example, do we fill in the blank in the following sentence? "A good teacher always makes sure is well prepared for the lesson. " Traditionally, this would be filled in with "he". The male pronoun in such cases is clearly intended to refer to both sexes. It is still widely used in this way, but some people, especially women, dislike it. They may prefer to add the female pronoun to the male, as in "A good teacher always makes sure he or she is well prepared for the lesson". Some people, however, feel that this looks and sounds awkward. Another solution is to use the plural "they" for the singular; "A good teacher always makes sure they are well prepared for the lesson. " This is often heard in conversation, but is less frequent in formal written English. More cautious souls can avoid the problem altogether by rephrasing in the plural: "Good teachers always make sure they are well prepared for the lesson. "
The extent to which language reflects and shapes attitudes and behaviors is a matter of conjecture. Chinese, Japanese, Persian and Turkish do not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns, but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languages are less sexist than males who speak English!
What is the best title for the passage?
选项
A、The Place of Women in Society
B、He or She
C、Chairman or Chairwoman
D、Language and Sexist Bias
答案
D
解析
主旨题。从文章第一句In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in theEnglish language.可以看出,该篇文章主要论述英语日常语言中的性别歧视问题,因此[D]是正确答案。[A]“女性在社会中的地位”文章有涉及,但是从语言的角度阐述的,因此不适合做文章的标题;[B]“他和她”是作为作者证明自己观点的例子出现的,也不适合做文章的标题;[C]与[B]的问题如出一辙,都只是举例。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9YXK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
______youareacollegeteacher,youprobablyhavetotakeyourholidaysinJulyandAugust.
Forparentswhosendtheirkidsofftocollegesaying,"Thesewillbethebestyearsofyourlife,"itwouldbeveryappropriate
Forparentswhosendtheirkidsofftocollegesaying,"Thesewillbethebestyearsofyourlife,"itwouldbeveryappropriate
TheVictorianshadbecomeaddictedtospeedandtheywantedtogoeverfaster.Timewasmoneyandefficiencybecame【C1】______im
WhatissaidaboutthelawpassedinCalifornia?
Themainideaofthebusinessschoolacademicisappealing.Inaworldwherecompaniesmustadapttonewtechnologiesandsource
Lastsummer,sometwenty-eightthousandhomelesspeoplewereofferedshelterbythecityofNewYork.Ofthisnumber,twelvetho
Hurricanesareseverecycloneswithwindsoverseventy-fivemilesanhour_____originateovertropicaloceanwaters.
Onthemapthere’sjustoneisland,butwhenyougetthereyou’llfindtwodistinctSardinias.Ifyou’rewonderingwhichisthe
[A]balanced[I]analyzes[B]moderately[J]fast[C]propels[K]expand[D]multitude[L]persecute[E]achievement[M]visual
随机试题
自感系数与线圈的()无关。
在多级目录结构中查找一个文件时需要按路径名搜索,当层次较多时要耗费很多的时间,为此引入
内镜从性能和质地角度可分为________和________。
A.万古霉素B.第三代头孢菌素联合氨基苷类抗生素C.青霉素D.第一代头孢菌素(或联合氨基苷类或新型青霉素)E.第二代头孢菌素下列肺部感染病例的经验性抗菌治疗宜选择:女性,22岁。1个月前皮肤疖肿未予注意
当疏浚不易在泥舱内沉淀的细颗粒土质时,关于提高舱内泥浆浓度,增加装舱量措施的说法正确的有()。
《建设工程质量管理条例》所称违法分包,是指( )的行为。
某公司拖欠2016年度增值税42万元,催款无效。经县税务局局长批准,2017年3月,税务机关书面通知开户银行扣缴所欠税款,这一行政行为属于()。
某公司本年的销售量为100万件,售价为20元/件,单位变动成本12元,总固定成本为50万元,优先股股息为75万元,利息费用为20万元,所得税税率为25%。下列说法正确的有()。
自小孩上初中后,李女士与丈夫经常因是否接送孩子上下学发生冲突。李女士认为,孩子从小体质弱。比较敏感,即使已上初中,为安全起见还是应该接送,但丈夫不以为然,还以工作为由将接送的事甩给了李女士。李女士对丈夫的行为很不解,怀疑丈夫有了“外心”,非常苦恼、困惑,遂
下列哪些事项不属于行政诉讼的受案范围?()
最新回复
(
0
)