首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Low-carbon Future:We Can Afford to Go Green Tackling climate change will cost consumers the earth.Those who campaign for a g
Low-carbon Future:We Can Afford to Go Green Tackling climate change will cost consumers the earth.Those who campaign for a g
admin
2010-07-24
42
问题
Low-carbon Future:We Can Afford to Go Green
Tackling climate change will cost consumers the earth.Those who campaign for a green revolution are out to destroy our western lifestyles.Such are the cries of opponents of emissions cuts,and their message has political impact:a number of surveys have found that the enthusiasm of voters for policies to reduce climate change falls off as the price tag increases.
However,a new modelling(模型化)exercise suggests that these fears are largely unfounded.It projects that radical cuts to the UK’s emissions will cause barely noticeable increases in the price of food,drink and most other goods by 2050.Electricity and petrol costs will rise significantly,but with the right policies in place,say the modellers,this need not lead to big changes in our lifestyle.
"these results show that the global project to fight climate change is feasible,"says Alex Bowen,a climate policy expert at the London School of Economics."It’s not such a big ask as people are making out."
Although it is impossible to precisely predict prices four decades from now.the exercise is one of the most detailed examinations yet of the impact of climate change policies on UK consumers.It provides a useful rough guide to our economic future.
Though its results speak directly to the UK consumer,previous research has come to similar conclusions for the US.In June,one study found that if the US were to cut emissions by 50 per cent by 2050,prices of most consumer goods would increase by less than 5 per cent.The findings are also consistent with analyses by the Pew Center on Global Climate Change in Washington DC."Even cutting emissions by 80 per cent over four decades has a very small effect on consumers in most areas,”says Manik Roy of the Pew Center."The challenge is now to convince consumers and policy-makers that this is the case."
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recommends that wealthy nations cut their emissions to between 80 and 95 per cent below 1990 levels by 2050 in order to avoid the worst effects of climate change.The UK government aims to reduce its contribution by 80 per cent and leaders of the other G8 nations have discussed following suit.To meet this goal,industries will have to cut down fossil fuel consumption,and low-carbon power sources will have to massively expand. Companies will have to pay increasingly higher prices for the right to emit greenhouse gases.
How will this affect the average citizen’s wallet? To measure the impact of the 80 per cent target on the UK population, New Scientist approached Cambridge Econometrics, a firm known for its modelling of the European economy. The firm used historic economic data to predict the impact of emissions reductions on prices in over 40 categories of goods and services. It compared the impact of the 80 per cent cut with a baseline situation in which the government takes no action other than the limited emissions restrictions already in place as a result of the Ky-oto protocol (京都议定书).
Most of the price increases are a consequence of rising energy costs, in part because coal and gas are re-placed by more expensive low-carbon sources. The price of electricity is projected to be 15 per cent higher in 2050 compared with the baseline. In today’s prices, that would add around £5 onto typical monthly household electricity bills. It will also result in higher prices elsewhere, as every industrial sector uses electricity.
But electricity and other forms of energy make up only a small part of the price of most goods. Other factors-raw materials, labour and taxes-are far more important. The energy that goes into producing food, alcoholic drinks and tobacco, for example, makes up just 2 per cent of the consumer price. For motor vehicle purchases and hotel stays, the figure is 1 per cent. Only for energy-intensive industries does the contribution climb above 3 per cent.
As a result, most products cost just a few per cent more by 2050. At current prices, going low-carbon is forecast to add around 5 pence to the price of a slice of bread or a pint of beer. The price of household appliances such as washing machines rises by a few pounds.
There is one major exception to the pattern. Airlines do not currently have a low-carbon alternative to jet fuel. Unless one is found, they will bear the full burden of carbon pricing, and average fares will rise by at least 140 per cent--raising the cost of a typical London to New York return trip from around £350 to £840.
Achieving the overall picture of low prices does require government action. The model forecasts that by 2050 natural gas and petrol will cost 160 per cent and 32 per cent more respectively. To avoid large price rises in home heating and road transport while still hitting the 80 per cent target, the Cambridge researchers had to build two major policies into their analysis. They assumed that future governments will provide grants to help switch all domestic heating and cooking to electricity, and invest in the basic facilities needed for electric cars to almost completely replace petroleum-fuelled vehicles.
Both policies have been discussed in recent UK government strategy documents, though the detail of how they would be implemented still needs further discussion. Firm policies must follow if ambitious emissions cuts are going to be made, says Chris Thoung of Cambridge Econometrics.
So is tackling climate change going to be easier than expected, in terms of consumer costs? While the Cam-bridge Econometrics model is widely respected and regularly used by the UK government’s climate change advisers, any attempt to forecast four decades ahead can be diverted from its intended course by unforeseen events. That leads some economists to question the model’s results.
For example, companies could move to countries with less strict carbon regulations, points out Richard Tol of the Economic and Social Research Institute in Dublin, Ireland. Incomes in the UK would fall, making goods relatively more expensive. Tol also questions whether it is reasonable to use historical prices as a basis for projecting beyond 2020.
Despite this, the Cambridge Econometrics results, together with other recent studies, do provide a useful guide for governments, says Michael Grubb of the University of Cambridge. They suggest that the overall challenge is conquerable, even if many of the details will only become clear in years to come.
The two major policies built by the Cambridge researchers include______.
选项
A、imposing higher taxes for petroleum-fuelled vehicles
B、stabilization of the price of daily goods and service
C、the electrification of residential heating and cooking system
D、the prohibition of driving petroleum-fuelled vehicles
答案
C
解析
该段倒数第2句提到剑桥研究者建立两个主要政策,最后_旬具体地指出这两个政策。其中_个是政府将拨款帮助把国内所有供暖和烹调系统转换为使用电力,C“将居民供暖和烹调系统电气化”与原文这个政策相符,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9rN7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Inthesamewaythatachildmustbeabletomovehisarmsandlegsbeforehecanlearntowalk,thechildmustphysiologically
Inthesamewaythatachildmustbeabletomovehisarmsandlegsbeforehecanlearntowalk,thechildmustphysiologically
Climatechangehasbroughtaboutsuchproblemsasbleaching-induced【S1】______ofcorals.Bleachingoccurswhencoralsaxestresse
Misersareoftenlonelyandobscuremenwhosewealthisrevealedonlyaftertheirdeath.JosephNollekens,however,wasapopula
Hungryprehistorichunters,notclimatechange,droveelephantstoextinctionduringthePleistoceneera(更新世),newresearchsu
Althoughthepossibilityoflivingalongandhappylifenowadaysisgreaterthaneverbefore,everydaywewitnesstheincredib
Wisebuyingisapositivewayinwhichyoucanmakeyourmoneygofurther.The【C1】______yougoaboutpurchasinganarticleora
Wisebuyingisapositivewayinwhichyoucanmakeyourmoneygofurther.The【C1】______yougoaboutpurchasinganarticleora
Thereisapopularbeliefamongparentsthatschoolsarenolongerinterestinginspelling.Thisis,however,a【S1】______Noscho
Thereisapopularbeliefamongparentsthatschoolsarenolongerinterestinginspelling.Thisis,however,a【S1】______Noscho
随机试题
团队规范的核心是()
A.奥美拉唑B.特布他林C.雷尼替丁D.氯苯那敏抑制胃壁细胞分泌H+而治疗消化性溃疡的药物是
A.胰高血糖素B.胰岛素C.生长抑素D.胰多肽E.胃泌素胰岛A细胞可分泌
治疗胆绞痛宜首选
下列关于药物用法用量的叙述错误的是
红学索隐派是指研究《红楼梦》的一个派别,又称政治索隐派。所谓索隐即透过字面探索作者隐匿在书中的真人真事。索隐派的主要手段是大作烦琐的考证,从小说的情节和人物中考索出“所隐之事,所隐之人”。根据以上定义,下列各项属于索隐派的是()。
背景材料:某施工单位承接了一座4×20m简支梁桥工程。桥梁采用扩大基础,墩身平均高10m。项目为单价合同。项目部拟就1~3号排架组织流水施工,各段流水节拍见下表:根据施工组织和技术要求,基础施工完成后至少10d才能施工墩身。
一般而言可转换债券的价格波动相对频繁。()
你别忘记列出一张学生必读的书单。
AreyourFacebookfriendsmoreinterestingthanthoseyouhaveinreallife?Hashigh-speedInternetmadeyouimpatientwithslo
最新回复
(
0
)