首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this wor
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this wor
admin
2013-05-29
37
问题
At PARC, we have lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years. Early on we confronted the question of how to do this work most ethically. We concluded that it is vitally important for everyone, scientists and consumers alike, to remain alert to the ethical issues we may face as the world becomes filled with embedded, invisible computers.
Computer chips have been inserted into everyday objects since the earliest days of the microprocessor. Today, an average home might have 40 chips in various devices, from remote controls to alarm clocks to wristwatches. This fact has raised few new ethical issues. But as computers become more and more ubiquitous, and less visually obvious, three questions arise. Firstly, will these chips thinking for us make us forget how to think for ourselves? Secondly, will an "information underclass" without access to these devices be created? And thirdly, will these chips invade our privacy?
The goal of ubiquitous computing is to make technology invisible and, by embedding computers into everyday things, make the things themselves smarter. But will this lead to dumber people with less control over their technology? Automobiles, for example, use embedded computers for a host of functions that improve their performance and reliability. But fewer people now know enough about their car to be their own mechanic. Should this loss of a once common skill concern us? I think not. Ever since the first pre-human shaped a stone into an axe, we have been improving our technology. The invention of the axe did represent a loss of control, because some people were better at making axes than others. But the axe also made life easier, so we had more time to develop other skills, like agriculture, art and writing. As another step along this continuum of invention, ubiquitous computing won’t make people dumber; it will give them time to get smart about other things.
I believe, however, that everyone should be given an equal opportunity to get smart about other things. In this regard, there is legitimate concern that the new ubiquitous computers won’t be equally available to everyone, thus driving a wedge between high-tech "haves" and "have-nots". But it is important to realize that the prime mover behind the latest technology is not the technology itself, but an agreement—the Internet.
Agreeing on low computers should talk to one another on the internet has tremendous advantages for exchanging information, decreasing the cost of technology and creating new market opportunities. If all chips are able to relate to each other, then information can be shared cheaply. This means that Internet access may eventually cost only a dollar or two. If the trend towards ever cheaper, more widespread access to information continues, there will be no information underclass.
Ubiquitous computing will make our lives more convenient, but it will also allow computers to know everything about us. Private actions, such as reading the newspaper, may be shared with other computers—and their owners—all over the world. When computers know so much, whom will they tell?
If a computer runs your toaster, for example, it knows when you make toast, and how many slices. By correlating toast-making activity with the license plate numbers of cars parked in front of your house, a computer could determine if a guest had spent the night. But if you were a married politician, and even if you were not, your might want to keep this information secret.
Democracy is based on the principle that if people have enough information, wise decisions will be made. In an age in which embedded computers will provide us with ever more information, it is vital that the ethical implications of this new technology be openly debated. With a little vigilance and planning, we can reap the benefits of this new technology without compromising our intelligence, our opportunities or our freedom.
It can be inferred that "PARC" is a place where ______.
选项
A、computers are manufactured
B、scientists and consumers live together
C、there are computers embedded all around
D、ethical issues are taught in class
答案
C
解析
首句就指出了“PARC”全面电脑化已近十年了(lived with ubiquitous computing for almost ten years),可见C为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/9zHO777K
0
研究生英语学位课统考(GET)
相关试题推荐
Somepeopleinsistthatonlytodayandtomorrowarethemostimportant.Buthowmuchpoorerwewouldbeifwereallylivedbyth
Thecar,andtheroadsittravelson,willberevolutionizedinthetwentyfirstcentury.Thekeytotomorrow’s"smartcars"wil
Thecar,andtheroadsittravelson,willberevolutionizedinthetwentyfirstcentury.Thekeytotomorrow’s"smartcars"wil
Giventheadvantageofelectronicmoney,youmightthinkthatweshouldmovequicklytothecashlesssocietyinwhichallpaymen
Youmayhavewonderedwhythesupermarketsareallthesame.Itisnotbecausethecompaniesthatoperatethemlackimagination.
Thequestionofwhydinosaursbecameextincthaspuzzledpaleontologistssincethefirstdinosaurfossilwasfoundalmosttwoce
TheAmericaneconomicsystemisorganizedaroundabasicallyprivate-enterprise,market-orientedeconomyinwhichconsumerslarg
TheAmericaneconomicsystemisorganizedaroundabasicallyprivate-enterprise,market-orientedeconomyinwhichconsumerslarg
(复旦大学2010年试题)Businessandgovernmentleadersconsidertheinflationratetobeanimportantgeneralindicator.Inflationis
Hisconstantattemptsto______hiscolleagues’achievementeventuallycausedhisdismissal.
随机试题
机动车在夜间通过没有交通信号灯控制的交叉路口时,应当________。
A.外周血白细胞增高B.淋巴结明显肿大C.两者皆有D.两者皆无急性粒细胞白血病
患者女,48岁。哮喘持续发作,呼吸36次/分,吸气时脉搏明显减弱,此时该患者的脉搏属于
民事诉讼的基本特征包括()。
张某承揽一项房屋装修工程,计划三个月完工,按照进度房主第一个月支付30000元,第二个月支付20000元,第三个月支付30000元。上述所得王某应缴纳个人所得税额( )元。
E公司将其优良资产注入F公司,F公司可以选择的支付方式有()。
某公安局邀请50余名人大代表、政协委员、执法监督员和部分群众代表走进警营,主动接受社会各界的监督和评价。上述人员中对公安机关执法活动的监督,不属于社会监督的是:
大豆:豆浆机:豆浆
社会媒体和大数据迁移研究
设方程组问:(1)a,b为何值时,方程组有唯一解;(2)a,b为何值时,方程组无解;(3)a,n为何值时,方程组有无穷多解,并求其通解.
最新回复
(
0
)