首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2010-06-30
72
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a con test) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" —especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
"British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice." It implies that ______.
选项
A、the British legal system can do the basic job well—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent
B、the British legal system is worse than the continental legal system
C、the British legal system is often considered to be not very fair
D、the British legal system is very efficient
答案
C
解析
这是一道推断题,句意为“英国审判制度与其说是严肃执法,倒不如说是一场游戏。”其言外之意就是“英国法律制度并不公正。”于是,正确答案应当为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/A6Jd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
TheissueofonlineprivacyintheInternetagefoundnewurgencyfollowingtheSept.11terroristattacks,sparkingdebateover
AnswerQuestions71to80byreferringtothe3articlesonjuveniledelinquency.AnswereachquestionbychoosingA,BorCand
AnswerQuestions71to80byreferringtothe3articlesonjuveniledelinquency.AnswereachquestionbychoosingA,BorCand
Whenmymotherlearnedshewaspregnantwithme,myparentssatdownoneSundaymorningtoreviewtheirfinances.Turningonthe
Somedoctorsaretakinganunusualnewapproachtocommunicatebetterwithpatients—theyareletting【C1】______readthenotestha
YouwillhearaninterviewwithStevenCasey,onhumanfactorsindesign.Asyoulisten,answerthequestionsorcompletetheno
Manyuniversitystudents【C1】______studyinghistorybecausethereislittletogetexcitedaboutwhenhistoricaleventsareprese
Howdowemeasuretheeconomicreturntohighereducation?Typicallyitiscalculatedasthedifferencebetweenaveragewagesof
Government答案信息在第七句:DrKissingerenteredgovernmentserviceinl969。
Mostpublishingisnow"electronic"inthesensethatbooks,magazinesandnewspapersarepreparedoncomputers,andexistasco
随机试题
中国特色社会主义进入新时代,这个新时代()
计算机软件是()的总称。
言人体脏腑之阴阳,则心为( )
A、检测和调节温度的设施B、配备必要的冷藏箱(柜)等设施,防止商品变质C、明亮,整洁,无环境污染源D、专门的生活区和办公区E、必要的场所及与经营品种和规模相适应的化验仪器、设备门市销售医药商品应
高危家庭不包括
脾胃虚寒者多见肾阳虚衰寒水上泛者多见
某公司预计下年耗用甲材料50000千克,每次进货费用60元。单位储存成本4元,单位缺货成本8元。要求:计算甲材料的经济进货批量和平均缺货量。
20世纪80年代,我国为促进科技发展而采取的措施不包括()。
吸烟有害健康,而烟草又是我国财政收入额的主要来源,你怎么看?
选用科学研究或实际生活中的例子,分析观察法、相关法以及实验法各自的优势与劣势。
最新回复
(
0
)