首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the stu
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the stu
admin
2011-08-28
30
问题
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the students—and their parents—make of this exercise. "Wait," I imagine them saying, "we’ve just paid you tens of thousands of dollars in tuition to take courses at your school, and now you’re asking us to tell you if the teachers you hired are any good? If you didn’t already know that they’re first class, you had no right taking our money."
We don’t hear this kind of response because, in fact, the large majority of teachers at Notre Dame do a good job. We don’t depend on our students to judge our basic competence as teachers, although they often suggest helpful adjustments in our pedagogy (and can call attention to cases of clear incompetence or irresponsibility when they occur). Over all, schools like Notre Dame hire people that they are confident will be competent teachers. And, although there are criticisms and room for improvement, students, parents, graduate/professional schools and employers are, over all, well satisfied with results.
Who are these successful teachers? Ph.D.’s from first-class programs, of course, but that’s because college teaching and research require a high level of specialist knowledge. Beyond this knowledge, college teachers do a good job because of qualities that they already have when they complete their undergraduate education: a high level of intelligence, enthusiasm for ideas and an ability to communicate. In this regard, they are like those who go into other knowledge-based professions like law, medicine, engineering and architecture. With faculties of the "best and the brightest" from the pool of undergraduates, colleges can be confident of good quality teaching. Moreover, as in other knowledge-based professions, college faculties can be trusted to do their jobs well with minimal external supervision, assessment and in-service training. The professional community itself is, on the whole, able to ensure a high level of competence among its members.
These reflections lead me to a simple proposal. Adopt the same model for grade school and high school teaching that works for colleges. Currently, few of the best students from the best colleges are grade school or high school teachers. (The most encouraging data merely suggest that high school teachers may be a bit above average, while grade school teachers are considerably below average). This is not because the best students have no interest in teaching.
Top doctoral programs have far more applicants than they can accept, and many excellent students don’t apply, either because they do not have a high enough level of specialized skills or because they do not want to risk the terrible job market for college teachers. Such students would form a natural pool for non-college teaching if the pay and working conditions were anywhere near the level of the college average. There are also many excellent students with no interest in the advanced research that is the focus of doctoral programs who would prefer non-college teaching to less intellectually engaging and less socially useful work in, say, management or sale.
So why not make use of all this talent to develop an elite class of professionals—like those who teach in our colleges—and give them primary responsibility for K-12 education? One objection is that teaching children and teenagers requires a set of social/emotional abilities—to empathize, to nurture, to discipline—that have little connection with the intellectual qualities of the "best" college students. But there is no reason to think that people who are smart, articulate and enthusiastic about ideas are in general less likely to have these non-intellectual abilities. The idea is to choose those who have both high intellectual ability and the qualities needed to work successfully with children at a given grade level. Moreover, it’s important that teachers be—as they now often are not—credible authority figures, a status readily supported by the justified self-confidence and prestige of an elite professional.
It’s sometimes urged that a high level of intellectual ability is not needed to understand high-school, not to say grade-school, subjects. This is true, but with our current low standards it is not unheard of to find teachers who lack even this basic understanding. Moreover, it requires considerable intelligence to respond adequately to the questions of bright students. Most important, the greatest intellectual challenge of teaching at any level is to find ways of presenting the content effectively. Our current system seems often to assume that K-12 teachers will need the guidance of "experts" to tell them how to do this. There’s considerable doubt as to the existence of the alleged expertise. For decades educational theory has produced a series of failed panaceas (new math, whole-language reading, writing across the curriculum, discovery-based learning, group projects, etc.). But, in any case, more intelligent teachers will be both more likely to develop on their own better methods of teaching and better able to understand and apply any wisdom that may come to them from above.
From The New York Times, June 7, 2012
What are the requirements of successful teaching in college?
选项
A、A high level of intelligence and external supervision.
B、Good communication ability and in-service training.
C、Enthusiasm for ideas and high level of specialist knowledge.
D、External supervision and in-service training.
答案
C
解析
本题为细节题。从文章第三段可以看出,The requirements of successful teaching in college are the follows:high level of specialist knowledge,a high level of intelligence,enthusiasm for ideas and good communication ability.所以C选项正确。由第三段倒数第二句Moreover,as in other knowledge-based professions.college faculties can be trusted to do their jobs well with minimal external supervision,assessment and in-service training,可以看出其他选项都是错误的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/AeYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Howtoliveto100Agrowingbodyofresearchsuggeststhatchronicillnessisnotaninevitableconsequenceofaging,butmo
TheFutureofPCMarketThefirstDevelopersConferenceinChinamarksamajormilestoneforMicrosoft,becausethesuccesso
A、exclusivelyincartoonsB、onlyinDisneyfeaturefilmsC、mainlyincartoonsandInDisneyfeaturefilmsD、bothincartoonsand
Ithasbeenknownformanydecadesthattheappearanceofsunspotsisroughlyperiodic,withanaveragecycleofelevenyears.M
Practicallyspeaking,theartisticmaturingofthecinemawasthesingle-handedachievementofDavidW.Griffith(1875-1948).Be
GovernmentsAreTryingA1990UnitedNationssurveyrevealedthatthemorehighlydevelopedcountriesspendanaverageof2t
Isad0raDuncan’smasterlywritingsonthedancerevealthedepthofherdeterminationtocreatealyricformoftheartwhichw
SamuelSlaterwasborninBelper,England,in1768.OncompletionofhissevenyearapprenticeshipinanEnglishspinningmill,
HowtoTakeNotesⅠ.ReasonsforNote-taking--(1)tomemory:sortingandrecallingtheinformation【1】______--provide
InBritain,childrenbetweentheagesof______to______mustreceivethecompulsoryeducation.
随机试题
关于刑事责任能力,下列哪一选项是正确的?()(2016/2/3)
缺乏沟通引发的问题情景1:工作为啥没有完成?下面是某部门主管和员工的对话:主管:月初布置给你的工作任务完成了吗?员工:我的工作需要财务部提供数据支持,但财务部未提供,所以没有办法完成。主管:财务部为什么不提
男性,36岁,输精管结扎后,左侧发生疼痛性结节,疼痛在性兴奋时加剧,并向腹股沟、下腹部放射,检查输精管残端有触痛性硬结与阴囊壁粘连,手术部位毗邻皮肤见有簇状丘疹,破损并有分泌物排出
《中华人民共和国传染病防治法》明确规定的传染病防治方针是
A.服用硝酸甘油可迅速缓解B.体力活动后疼痛减轻C.深呼吸或咳嗽时疼痛加剧D.服用抗酸剂后疼痛减轻,甚至消失E.局部有压痛反流性食管炎所致胸痛的特点为
下列哪项不是内脏性腹痛的特点
可承担单项合同额不超过企业注册资本金5倍的各等级公路及其桥梁的施工企业是()。
A公司(上市公司)是坐落于黑龙江省的国内大型现代化农业企业,公司采用现代农业生产方式,从事特色农产品种植、加工、保鲜、冷藏及销售。公司主要产品为:鲜食粘玉米、玉米果汁、玉米粒、青贮饲料、果肉型葡萄、葡萄酒。A公司资产总额近15亿元人民币,其中存货占公司资产
中国共产党第十八届中央委员会第五次全体会议审议通过《中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十三个五年规划的建议》,并提出了共享发展的新理念。下列选项中,哪些属于共享理念下的“十三五”规划将给百姓带来的实惠?()
某人工作一年的报酬是18000元和一台全自动洗衣机。他干了7个月,得到9500元和一台全自动洗衣机,问这台洗衣机值多少元?()
最新回复
(
0
)