首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the stu
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the stu
admin
2011-08-28
47
问题
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the students—and their parents—make of this exercise. "Wait," I imagine them saying, "we’ve just paid you tens of thousands of dollars in tuition to take courses at your school, and now you’re asking us to tell you if the teachers you hired are any good? If you didn’t already know that they’re first class, you had no right taking our money."
We don’t hear this kind of response because, in fact, the large majority of teachers at Notre Dame do a good job. We don’t depend on our students to judge our basic competence as teachers, although they often suggest helpful adjustments in our pedagogy (and can call attention to cases of clear incompetence or irresponsibility when they occur). Over all, schools like Notre Dame hire people that they are confident will be competent teachers. And, although there are criticisms and room for improvement, students, parents, graduate/professional schools and employers are, over all, well satisfied with results.
Who are these successful teachers? Ph.D.’s from first-class programs, of course, but that’s because college teaching and research require a high level of specialist knowledge. Beyond this knowledge, college teachers do a good job because of qualities that they already have when they complete their undergraduate education: a high level of intelligence, enthusiasm for ideas and an ability to communicate. In this regard, they are like those who go into other knowledge-based professions like law, medicine, engineering and architecture. With faculties of the "best and the brightest" from the pool of undergraduates, colleges can be confident of good quality teaching. Moreover, as in other knowledge-based professions, college faculties can be trusted to do their jobs well with minimal external supervision, assessment and in-service training. The professional community itself is, on the whole, able to ensure a high level of competence among its members.
These reflections lead me to a simple proposal. Adopt the same model for grade school and high school teaching that works for colleges. Currently, few of the best students from the best colleges are grade school or high school teachers. (The most encouraging data merely suggest that high school teachers may be a bit above average, while grade school teachers are considerably below average). This is not because the best students have no interest in teaching.
Top doctoral programs have far more applicants than they can accept, and many excellent students don’t apply, either because they do not have a high enough level of specialized skills or because they do not want to risk the terrible job market for college teachers. Such students would form a natural pool for non-college teaching if the pay and working conditions were anywhere near the level of the college average. There are also many excellent students with no interest in the advanced research that is the focus of doctoral programs who would prefer non-college teaching to less intellectually engaging and less socially useful work in, say, management or sale.
So why not make use of all this talent to develop an elite class of professionals—like those who teach in our colleges—and give them primary responsibility for K-12 education? One objection is that teaching children and teenagers requires a set of social/emotional abilities—to empathize, to nurture, to discipline—that have little connection with the intellectual qualities of the "best" college students. But there is no reason to think that people who are smart, articulate and enthusiastic about ideas are in general less likely to have these non-intellectual abilities. The idea is to choose those who have both high intellectual ability and the qualities needed to work successfully with children at a given grade level. Moreover, it’s important that teachers be—as they now often are not—credible authority figures, a status readily supported by the justified self-confidence and prestige of an elite professional.
It’s sometimes urged that a high level of intellectual ability is not needed to understand high-school, not to say grade-school, subjects. This is true, but with our current low standards it is not unheard of to find teachers who lack even this basic understanding. Moreover, it requires considerable intelligence to respond adequately to the questions of bright students. Most important, the greatest intellectual challenge of teaching at any level is to find ways of presenting the content effectively. Our current system seems often to assume that K-12 teachers will need the guidance of "experts" to tell them how to do this. There’s considerable doubt as to the existence of the alleged expertise. For decades educational theory has produced a series of failed panaceas (new math, whole-language reading, writing across the curriculum, discovery-based learning, group projects, etc.). But, in any case, more intelligent teachers will be both more likely to develop on their own better methods of teaching and better able to understand and apply any wisdom that may come to them from above.
From The New York Times, June 7, 2012
What are the requirements of successful teaching in college?
选项
A、A high level of intelligence and external supervision.
B、Good communication ability and in-service training.
C、Enthusiasm for ideas and high level of specialist knowledge.
D、External supervision and in-service training.
答案
C
解析
本题为细节题。从文章第三段可以看出,The requirements of successful teaching in college are the follows:high level of specialist knowledge,a high level of intelligence,enthusiasm for ideas and good communication ability.所以C选项正确。由第三段倒数第二句Moreover,as in other knowledge-based professions.college faculties can be trusted to do their jobs well with minimal external supervision,assessment and in-service training,可以看出其他选项都是错误的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/AeYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Oneofthemostsuccessfulcommercialproductseverlaunchedissaidtohavecomeaboutastheresultofamistake.In1896,by
Socialcustomsandwaysofbehavingchange.Thingswhichwereconsideredimpolitemanyyearsagoareacceptable.Justa【1】___
A、mayberemovedfromhispresentpostinIraqB、maybeappointedasthetopU.S.commanderinIraqC、isresponsibleforthepri
Intheatmosphere,carbondioxideactsratherlikeaone-waymirror--theglassintheroofofagreenhousewhichallowsthesun’
Coffee,ahotbeveragefavoredbypeopleindifferentregions,issaidtohavebeen【1】______【1】______inEthiopia.Itwasfound
SeaottersdwellintheNorthPacific.Theyarethelargestofthemustelids,agroupwhichalsoincludesfreshwaterotters,wea
Thereis______agelimitforadulteducation.
______isanautobiographicalnovelbyJamesJoyce.
Ifthemaximsofcooperativeprincipleisviolated,______mightoccur.
随机试题
县医院欲开展结扎手术和终止妊娠手术,须经哪一级部门批准
耳朵:赫兹
适用于挖掘浅且短的路堑的施工方法是()。
电子信息系统机房选址时,数据中心内放置计算机的机房不宜超过()。
黄河公司运用标准成本系统计算甲产品成本,有关资料如下:(1)本期单位产品直接材料的标准用量为5千克,单位材料的标准价格为2元,单位产品的标准工时为4小时,预计标准总工时为2000小时,标准工资总额为6000元,标准制造费用总额为7200元(其中变动
甲公司获得了A产品的实用新型专利,不久后乙公司自行研制出了与甲公司专利相同的A产品,并大规模生产;丙公司从乙公司处批发购进A产品100箱,并将其中的20箱提供给丁公司办公使用;乙公司、丙公司和丁公司对甲公司已经获得A产品的专利一事均不知情。根据专利法律制度
关于行政法规起草的规定,下列哪些说法是正确的?()
()是指工作结果对组织有重大影响的活动或大量的重复性活动。
文慧是新东方学校的人力资源培训讲师,负责对新入职的教师进行入职培训,其PowerPoint演示文稿的制作水平广受好评。最近,她应北京节水展馆的邀请,为展馆制作一份宣传水知识及节水工作重要性的演示文稿。节水展馆提供的文字资料及素材参见“水资源利用与节水(
A、Itcanprintoutsoftobjectsonly.B、Itbuildsupsolidobjectslayerbylayer.C、Itgivesa3Dimageofanobject’sstructur
最新回复
(
0
)