首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
The following paragraphs are given in a wrong order. For Questions 41-45, you are required to reorganize these paragraphs into a
The following paragraphs are given in a wrong order. For Questions 41-45, you are required to reorganize these paragraphs into a
admin
2009-04-27
90
问题
The following paragraphs are given in a wrong order. For Questions 41-45, you are required to reorganize these paragraphs into a coherent article by choosing from the list A-G. Some of the paragraphs have been placed for you. (10 points)
A. Then, in the 1970s, science began to show that the nurture—only view was indeed too simplistic-which triggered a backlash from the left. When researchers like Richard Herrnstein and E.O. Wilson demonstrated that genes do play a significant role in human intelligence and behavior, for example, they were vilified by many of their colleagues. And just a few years ago, a conference designed to explore the genetic roots of violence had to be canceled in the face of widespread condemnation.
B. But if you think this compromise has stopped the arguments, think again. Scientists and philosophers are still getting steamed up over the issue, but now they’re fighting over percentages, over how much of human character is shaped by genes and how much by environment. And according to Steven Pinker, a professor of psychology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, we continue to give far too much credit to the latter. In a new book, The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature (Viking), Pinker argues that ignorance, prejudice and political correctness have kept scientists and the public from appreciating the power of our genes.
C. The backlash was understandable, says Pinker. Once you suggest that human nature is in any way hardwired, it’s easier for the unscrupulous to write off entire groups as genetically inferior-as the Nazis did with Jews, Poles and Gypsies. If have-nots are genetically lacking in drive or intelligence or ambition, what’s the point of fighting poverty?
D. That echoed 20th century liberal social theory: violence, crime and poverty were not the fault of the violent, the lawless and the poor but of society. Improve living conditions and you will curd the problems. These notions, of course,, flew in the face of everything conservatives held dear—the idea that the lower classes were inherently stupid and lazy, for example, and that rehabilitating lawbreakers was an exercise in futility which may have been part of their appeal.
E. Anyone who has read Pinker’s earlier books will rightly guess that his latest effort is similarly sweeping, erudite, sharply argued, richly footnoted and fun to read. It’s also highly persuasive. The view that environment is paramount began, he says, with the philosophers of the Enlightenment: John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Rene Descartes and John Stuart Mill. And it was reinforced in the 1950s by Harvard psychologist B.F. Skinner, who said that all human behavior was simply a set of conditioned responses.
F. In one important sense the argument over nature and nurture has been resolved. For centuries, the nature camp said that personalities are born, not made, that our character is pretty much formed by the time we pop out of the womb. The nurture people countered with the metaphor of the tabula rasa: our mind starts out as a blank slate, and it’s how we are reared that determines what gets written on it. Modern science, though—especially our fast-growing understanding of the human genome—makes it clear that both sides are partly right. Nature endows us with inborn abilities and personality traits; nurture takes these raw materials and molds them as we learn and mature.
G. Plenty, says Pinker. Compassion and altruism (which he thinks also are at least partly hardwired) are good reasons to make life better for those who start out at a disadvantage. And while Pinker also admits, albeit in a less strident voice, that environment plays a significant part in how we turn out, he insists it’s just not the whole story and our genes, which haven’t got enough respect, do play significant roles.
选项
答案
D
解析
该段首句That echoed 20th century liberal social theory中的that指代的正是E段所叙述的内容,很显然紧接E段,为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Ata4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Socialscientistshavebeentryingtoidentifytheconditionsmostlikelytopromotesatisfyinghumanlives.Theirfindingsgive
Duringtheday,Leipzig’sairportisquiet.Itisatnightthattheairfieldcomestolife.Nexttotherunwayayellowwarehous
Readthefollowingtextandanswerquestionsbyfindinginformationfromtherightcolumnthatcorrespondstoeachofthemarked
BritishphysicistDr.JessWadehaswritten270Wikipediapagesfortrailblazingfemalescientistsinanefforttogeteverywom
BritishphysicistDr.JessWadehaswritten270Wikipediapagesfortrailblazingfemalescientistsinanefforttogeteverywom
Aftertakingabriefpausetoweathertherecession,aninvasionofBritainbysomeofAmerica’sbest-knownretailbrands—includ
DuringthenextseveralweeksIwentcompletelytothewolves.Itookatinytentandsetitupontheshoreofbay.Thebigtel
Thedeclineofcivilityandgoodmannersmaybeworryingpeoplemorethancrime,accordingtoGentilityRecalled,editedbyDigb
Itmaybesummertime,butthelivingisn’teasy—notforwearyworkerswhoselastvacationisadistantmemory.Accordingtoone
随机试题
()具有强烈的现实主义色彩,标志着我国古代叙事诗的成熟。
关于营养性巨幼细胞性贫血的叙述不正确的是
肥达反应属于
女性,25岁,化脓性扁桃体炎,医嘱青霉素过敏试验。过敏试验1分钟后,患者注射部位出现皮肤发红,面色苍白,考虑患者不可能出现的是
(2016年)下列有关项目合伙人复核的说法中,错误的是()。
在Excel工作表中,进行自动分类汇总之前必须()。
请阅读下面录像题的情景叙述,找出情景叙述中秘书行为及工作环境中正确或错误的地方(应至少找出10处正误点)。人物:施林宏远公司总经理助理刘俊宏远公司秘书方平行政部经理刘明营销部经理王芳生产部经理
某家长带一位3岁小孩前来咨询,患儿常有多汗、易惊、出牙迟及枕秃等症状。前胸部两侧肋骨与软骨交界处外凸成“肋肌串珠”,肋下缘外翻,胸部前凸成“鸡胸”,脊柱后凸成驼背,腹肌软弱无力,腹胀。该儿童可能患有什么疾病。
发展的过程性原理要求人们
[A]Donotletothersdictateyourmajorlifegoals[B]Donotcreateabiglistofgoals[C]Getorganizedinalltheare
最新回复
(
0
)