首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Things You Can’t Say in Canada A) Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into o
Things You Can’t Say in Canada A) Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into o
admin
2017-11-17
45
问题
Things You Can’t Say in Canada
A) Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into one looked down upon by all others—but it can also be a lot of fun. Every culture has its unacknowledged taboos—the things you are forbidden to say or do in polite company, the accepted truths you are not allowed to doubt. You might think that a liberal, open-minded country like Canada would be free of such taboos, but you’d be wrong. In spite of our belief in our own civilized tolerance, some things are simply not open to debate. If you try, you’re bound to shock the neighbors.
B) It’s risky to question the wisdom of the tribe. You might get stoned. On the other hand, some people might walk secretly up to you afterwards and tell you that they secretly agree. So here’s a challenge to a few of our nation’s most widely held beliefs. You say these things in public at your own danger. I will be elaborating on these points over the months to come. Feel free to stone me or secretly agree—or, even better, add to the list. At the very least, they’re sure to start a good dinner-party fight.
C) Margaret Atwood writes some really awful books. The queen of Canadian literature dominates the literary world like a giant. Nobody has won more awards than she has, and nobody is more feared. There is no such a thing as a bad review of a Margaret Atwood book in Canada That’s too bad, because many of her books are tedious and unreadable, full of unpleasant characters and plot filled with torture. Why will no one say so? Because we’re grateful that she has put us on the global map. And because if they do, they’ll never work in this country again.
D) Recycling is a waste of time and money. Once upon a time it was easy to put out the trash. Today, the Garbage Gestapo rules our lives. Every household has become a mini version of the village dump, and every one of us has become a garbage picker, carefully separating our organic waste from our bottles and papers, and worrying about where our different kinds of garbage are supposed to go. Don’t try to sort a wine bottle into the wrong bag! The trash police will punish you. The truth about recycling is that it’s a giant waste of dollars and doesn’t help the environment. But don’t tell your kids. They won’t believe you. They’ve been brainwashed.
E) Only private enterprise can save public health care. Tommy Douglas, the CBC’s Greatest Canadian, brought us universal health care. But even his plan didn’t originally pay for everybody’s minor diseases, such as ingrown toenails. His primary goal was to make sure nobody faced financial ruin if they got sick. Today we have a system where controlling costs is more important than treating patients, and where ideology is disabling us. In some places, including Toronto, people go blind waiting for cataract (白内障) surgery. The government could restore their sight tomorrow simply by sending them to a private clinic instead of to a hospital. The cost to the government would be exactly the same. But in Canada, "private" is a dirty word, and so the government would rather you go blind. Poor Tommy would be spinning in his grave.
F) David Suzuki is bad for the environment. From global warming to farmed salmon and genetically modified crops, David Suzuki has just one message: The end is near. He is our homegrown prophet of doom, who can predict what will happen in the future. He advocates the essential wickedness of the human race. Like a modern Savonarola, he warns that unless we cast our material possessions into the bonfire, we’re all going to hell. The trouble with this predicting vision is that people are starting to isolate from the environment. And our hugely expensive investment in the unworkable Kyoto treaty, which Mr. Suzuki tells us doesn’t go nearly far enough, will wipe out more practical measures to cut smog and clean up our waste sites.
G) A national daycare program won’t do a thing to help poor kids. Cheap national daycare! Who could be against it? It’s supposed to give kids a better start in life, and nobody can object to that. But in Quebec, where the program started, universal daycare has turned out to be nothing more than a giant (and extremely costly) subsidy for relatively well-off middle-class parents. Few poor parents use the system. No doubt convenient daycare is a gift sent by god for many people. But so far there is no definitive evidence that kids who go to daycare go on to do better in school or in life. So if we want to invest billions in helping kids, why are we spending it on the kids who need help the least?
H) Group of Seven artists are overexposed genre (类型) painters. I like A.Y. Jackson as much as you do. His paintings remind me of when I went to summer camp. I grew up with a reproduction of The West Wind hanging in our living room. (That was by Tom Thomson, who wasn’t really a member of Group of Seven, but never mind.) Group of Seven were the first artists to depict the wild Canadian landscape, and they were bold young rebels in their time. But that time was 80 years ago. Today their work is the essence of bourgeois picture-postcard art—the kind of art it’s safe to take your mother to see. Enough, already. Maybe it’s time we moved on.
I) The United States is the greatest force for ever the world has ever known. Of all the shocking things you can say around the dinner table, this is the most shocking one. After all, America-criticizing is part of our national identity. At best, we see our neighbor as a well-intentioned but arrogant and wrong-doing bully (欺负弱小者) that throws its weight around too much. At worst, we see our neighbor as one of the most evil nations in the world. And yet, right now, hundreds of millions of people in desperately poor parts of the world are being liberated from millennia of suffering and serfdom. Why? Because of the United States, which has spread its idea of economic freedom—and its purchasing power—around the world.
Criticizing the United States is the Canada’s national identity.
选项
答案
I
解析
根据Criticizing,the United States定位到I段的第3句,题目表述跟该句意思相同,故选I。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Axa7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
FormanypeopleintheU.S.,sportsarenotjustforfun.Theyarealmostareligion.Thousandsofsportsfansbuyexpensivetic
FormanypeopleintheU.S.,sportsarenotjustforfun.Theyarealmostareligion.Thousandsofsportsfansbuyexpensivetic
FormanypeopleintheU.S.,sportsarenotjustforfun.Theyarealmostareligion.Thousandsofsportsfansbuyexpensivetic
FormanypeopleintheU.S.,sportsarenotjustforfun.Theyarealmostareligion.Thousandsofsportsfansbuyexpensivetic
FormanypeopleintheU.S.,sportsarenotjustforfun.Theyarealmostareligion.Thousandsofsportsfansbuyexpensivetic
Peoplebecomequiteillogicalwhentheytrytodecidewhatcanbeeatenandwhatcannot.IfyoulivedintheMediterranean,for
ThingsYouCan’tSayinCanadaA)Attackingoursacredcows(thingsorpeoplethatcannotbecriticized)mayturnyouintoo
ThingsYouCan’tSayinCanadaA)Attackingoursacredcows(thingsorpeoplethatcannotbecriticized)mayturnyouintoo
ThingsYouCan’tSayinCanadaA)Attackingoursacredcows(thingsorpeoplethatcannotbecriticized)mayturnyouintoo
随机试题
患者男,28岁,右眼痒,烧灼感20天。检查:右眼视力0.9,右眼睫毛根部可见散布小脓疱,有大量痂皮覆盖,去除痂皮后有脓液渗出,并露出小溃疡。睫毛粘连成束,数十根睫毛脱落,部分睫毛乱生。球结膜中度充血,角膜上皮点状脱落。余检查未见异常。左眼视力1.0,眼前段
患者,女,30岁,妊娠6个月。疲乏倦怠,嗜睡懒言,四肢无力,近来胎动不安。治疗首选药物是
为配制注射剂用的溶剂是
清洗设备及装配件表面的防锈油脂的要求中,对形状复杂、污垢黏附严重、清洗要求高的装配件,宜采用()。
建筑施工企业的下列行为中,应作为不良行为记人其信用档案的有()。
甲公司2015年至2018年对乙公司股票投资的有关资料如下:(1)2015年1月1日,甲公司向乙公司某大股东发行每股面值为1元、公允价值为3.5元的普通股1000万股,同时承担该股东对第三方的债务1000万元(未来现金流量的现值),以获取该股东拥有的
甲公司2×17年度会计处理与税法处理存在差异的交易或事项如下:(1)持有的以公允价值计量且其变动计入当期损益的金融资产公允价值上升60万元。根据税法规定,该金融资产持有期间公允价值的变动金额不计入当期应纳税所得额;(2)计提与担保事项相关的预计负债600万
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性()。
系统测试中应遵循的一条原则是:测试工作应该由以下人员来承担()。
Thethousandsofpeopleforcedtoabandontheirhomesinrecentweekstofloodwatersarevictimsnotjustofnaturebutofhuman
最新回复
(
0
)