首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
READING PASSAGE 3 You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 29-40 which are based on Reading Passage 3 on the following pag
READING PASSAGE 3 You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 29-40 which are based on Reading Passage 3 on the following pag
admin
2009-05-13
54
问题
READING PASSAGE 3
You should spend about 20 minutes on Questions 29-40 which are based on Reading Passage 3 on the following pages.
THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD
A
’Hypotheses,’ said Medawar in 1964, ’are imaginative and inspirational in character’; they are ’adventures of the mind’. He was arguing in favour of the position taken by Karl Popper in The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1972, 3rd edition) that the nature of scientific method is hypothetico-deductive and not, as is generally believed, inductive.
B
It is essential that you, as an intending researcher, understand the difference between these two interpretations of the research process so that you do not become discouraged or begin to suffer from a feeling of ’cheating’ or not going about it the right way.
C
The myth of scientific method is that it is inductive: that the formulation of scientific theory starts with the basic, raw evidence of the senses - simple, unbiased, unprejudiced observation. Out of these sensory data - commonly referred to as ’facts’ - generalisations will form. The myth is that from a disorderly array of factual information an orderly, relevant theory will somehow emerge. However, the starting point of induction is an impossible one.
D
There is no such thing as an unbiased observation. Every act of observation we make is a function of what we have seen or otherwise experienced in the past. All scientific work of an experimental or exploratory nature starts with some expectation about the outcome. This expectation is a hypothesis. Hypotheses provide the initiative and incentive for the inquiry and influence the method. It is in the light of an expectation that some observations are held to be relevant and some irrelevant, that one methodology is chosen and others discarded, that some experiments are conducted and others are not. Where is your naive, pure and objective researcher now?
E
Hypotheses arise by guesswork, or by inspiration, but having been formulated they can and must be tested rigorously, using the appropriate methodology. If the predictions you make as a result of deducing certain consequences from your hypothesis are not shown to be correct then you discard or modify your hypothesis. If the predictionsturn out to be correct then your hypothesis has been supported and may be retained until such time as some further test shows it not to be correct. Once you have arrived at your hypothesis, which is a product of your imagination, you then proceed to a strictly logical and rigorous process, based upon deductive argument - hence the term ’hypothetico-deductive’.
F
So don’t worry if you have some idea of what your results will tell you before you even begin to collect data; there are no scientists in existence who really wait until they have all the evidence in front of them before they try to work out what it might possibly mean. The closest we ever get to this situation is when something happens by accident; but even then the researcher has to formulate a hypothesis to be tested before being sure that, for example, a mould might prove to be a successful antidote to bacterial infection.
G
The myth of scientific method is not only that it is inductive (which we have seen is incorrect) but also that the hypothetico-deductive method proceeds in a step-by-step, inevitable fashion. The hypothetico- deductive method describes the logical approach to much research work, but it does not describe the psychological behaviour that brings it about. This is much more holistic - involving guesses, reworkings, corrections, blind alleys and above all inspiration, in the deductive as well as the hypothetic component- than is immediately apparent from reading the final thesis or published papers. These have been, quite properly, organised into a more serial, logical order so that the worth of the output may be evaluated independently of the behavioural processes by which it was obtained. It is the difference, for example between the academic papers with which Crick and Watson demonstrated the structure of the DNA molecule and the fascinating book The Double Helix in which Watson (1968) described how they did it. From this point of view, ’scientific method’ may more usefully be thought of as a way of writing up research rather than as a way of carrying it out.
选项
答案
Ⅳ
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/BMVO777K
本试题收录于:
雅思阅读题库雅思(IELTS)分类
0
雅思阅读
雅思(IELTS)
相关试题推荐
Byronpossessedpowersofobservationthatwouldhavemadehimagreatanthropologistandthatmakeshislettersasagroupthe
Whichofthefollowing,iftrue,mostlogicallycompletesthepolitician’sargument?UnitedStatespolitician:Althoughtheamou
John:YoutoldmeoncethatnoUnitedStatescitizenwhosupportsunionlaborshouldbuyanimportedcar.Yetyouarebuyingan
Whichofthefollowingmostlogicallycompletesthemarketforecaster’sargument?Marketforecaster:Thepriceofpecansishigh
Inadditiontoconventionalgalaxies,theuniversecontainsverydimgalaxiesthatuntilrecentlywentunnoticedbyastronomers.
Inadditiontoconventionalgalaxies,theuniversecontainsverydimgalaxiesthatuntilrecentlywentunnoticedbyastronomers.
Whichofthefollowingmostlogicallycompletesthepassage?AbusinessanalysisoftheAppenianrailroadsystemdivideditslon
ThefollowingappearedinahealthmagazinepublishedinCorpora."Medicalexpertssaythatonlyone-quarterofCorpora’scitize
Abowlcontains20marbles(8blue,6red,3green,2yellow,and1orange).Ifyoureachinandchooseonemarbleatrandom,wh
随机试题
用人单位依法应保存工资支付书面记录备查,保存时间是()
A.血中HbCO浓度升高B.化学性肺水肿C.主要表现中枢神经系统症状D.造血功能异常E.肝血管肉瘤
诊断胰岛素瘤的最准确方法是
挥发油不具有的性质是
关于当事人适格的表述,下列哪一选项是错误的?(2008年试卷三第44题)
某企业因不服工商局吊销其营业执照的处罚,向人民法院提起行政诉讼,并要求赔偿。据此,回答下列两个问题。下列说法正确的有:()
甲公司和乙公司采用的会计政策和会计期间相同,甲公司和乙公司2014年至2015年有关长期股权投资及其内部交易或事项如下:资料一:2014年度资料①1月1日,甲公司以银行存款18400万元自非关联方购入乙公司80%有表决权的股份。交易前,甲公司不持有乙公
对于未函证的应收账款,注册会计师应()。
心理咨询师和求助者之间的人际距离应属于()
有三个关系R、S和T如下:则由关系R和S得到关系T的操作是
最新回复
(
0
)