首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
In 2010, a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades—by
In 2010, a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades—by
admin
2016-01-05
59
问题
In 2010, a federal judge shook America’s biotech industry to its core. Companies had won patents for isolated DNA for decades—by 2005 some 20% of human genes were patented. But in March 2010 a judge ruled that genes were unpatentable. Executives were violently agitated. The Biotechnology Industry Organi-zation(BIO), a trade group, assured members that this was just a "preliminary step" in a longer battle.
On July 29th they were relieved, at least temporarily. A federal appeals court overturned the prior decision, ruling that Muriad Genetics could indeed hold patents to two genes that help forecast a woman’s risk of breast cancer. The chief executive of Mytiad, a company in Utah, said the ruling was a blessing to firms and patients alike.
But as companies continue their attempts at personalised medicine, the courts will remain rather busy. The Myriad case itself is probably not over. Critics make three main arguments against gene patents: a gene is a product of nature, so it may not be patented; gene patents suppress innovation rather than reward it; and patents’ monopolies restrict access to genetic tests such as Myriad’s. A growing number seem to agree.
Last year a federal task-force urged reform for patents related to genetic tests. In October the Department of Justice filed a brief in the Myriad case, arguing that an isolated DNA molecule "is no less a product of nature ... than are cotton fibres that have been separated from cotton seeds."
Despite the appeals court’s decision, big questions remain unanswered. For example, it is unclear whether the sequencing of a whole genome violates the patents of individual genes within it. The case may yet reach the Supreme Court.
As the industry advances, however, other suits may have an even greater impact. Companies are unlikely to file many more patents for human DNA molecules—most are already patented or in the public domain. Firms are now studying how genes interact, looking for correlations that might be used to determine the causes of disease or predict a drug’ s efficacy. Companies are eager to win patents for "connecting the dots," explains Hans Sauer, a lawyer for the BIO.
Their success may be determined by a suit related to this issue, brought by the Mayo Clinic, which the Supreme Court will hear in its next term. The BIO recently held a convention which included sessions to coach lawyer on the shifting landscape for patents.
Each meeting was packed
.
Generally speaking, the author’ s attitude toward gene patenting is
选项
A、critical.
B、supportive.
C、scornful.
D、objective.
答案
D
解析
态度题。纵观全文,作者对基因申请专利的态度既不是A项“批评的”,也不是B项“支持的”,更不是C项“嘲笑的”,作者列举了反对方的理由也提到了生物技术公司的表现及应对措施,对法庭的判决和BIO协会的态度都是公正客观的,所以答案D项“客观的”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/BRsZ777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
AsPhiladelphiagrewfromasmalltownintoacityinthefirsthalfoftheeighteenthcentury,itbecameanincreasinglyimport
AsPhiladelphiagrewfromasmalltownintoacityinthefirsthalfoftheeighteenthcentury,itbecameanincreasinglyimport
AsPhiladelphiagrewfromasmalltownintoacityinthefirsthalfoftheeighteenthcentury,itbecameanincreasinglyimport
AsPhiladelphiagrewfromasmalltownintoacityinthefirsthalfoftheeighteenthcentury,itbecameanincreasinglyimport
CompaniesarelobbyinghardtoremovetheEU’straceabilityandlabelingpoliciesforproductscontainingGMingredients.Br
CompaniesarelobbyinghardtoremovetheEU’straceabilityandlabelingpoliciesforproductscontainingGMingredients.Br
Isitpossiblethatwomenmaychangetheirmindsaboutgoingouttoworkinthefaceofallthatsocialdisorder—crime,delinque
TransatlanticfrictionbetweencompaniesandregulatorshasgrownasEurope’sdataguardianshavebecomemoreassertive.Frances
OneofthemostpressingchallengesthattheUnitedStates—andindeed,theworld—willfaceinthenextfewdecadesishowtoall
Verysoon,unimaginablypowerfultechnologieswillremakeourlives.Thiscouldhavedangerousconsequences,especiallybecause
随机试题
关于见证取样和送检次数的说法,正确的有()。
试述幽门螺杆菌(HeIicobactorPyIori,Hp)对胃十二指肠粘膜的致病作用。
下列哪一项病理变化与脾胃虚弱有关
深昏迷患者不能将痰液咳出的主要原因是
股东享有的权利包括()。Ⅰ.收益分配权Ⅱ.知情权Ⅲ.监督权Ⅳ.表决权
某公司从银行获得贷款2亿元,期限3年,贷款年利率为6.5%,约定每年付息一次,到期一次性还本。假设筹资费用率为0.5%,公司所得税率为25%,则该公司该笔贷款的资本成本率是()。
有网友发帖称,8月28从湖北襄樊到陕西安康的某次列车,其有效座位为978个.实际售票数却高达3633张。铁道部要求,普快列车超员率不得超过50%,这次列车却超过了370%.属于严重超员。如果以下陈述为真,哪一项对该网友的论断构成严重质疑?
贫困的要素不仅包括物质和收入水平指标,还包括能力指标,即人类基本能力和权利的剥夺。权利贫困就是缺乏政治、经济、文化和社会基本人权的一种贫困状态。权利贫困是贫困的核心,物质贫困是贫困的具体表现,权利贫困是造成物质贫困的根本原因。下列选项不属于权利贫困的是:
Salt,shellsormetalsarestillusedasmoneyinout-the-waypartsoftheworldtoday.Saltmayseemratherastrange【B1】_
一个完整的程序必须完成3个层次的过程,它们分别是编码、测试和______。
最新回复
(
0
)