首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
An Australian research group may ease humanity’s collective conscience over a spate of prehistoric extinctions on the southern c
An Australian research group may ease humanity’s collective conscience over a spate of prehistoric extinctions on the southern c
admin
2015-09-26
45
问题
An Australian research group may ease humanity’s collective conscience over a spate of prehistoric extinctions on the southern continent. The die-off, they say, was not the rapacious work of newly arrived humans, but was due rather to changing climate.
Australia’s large prehistoric animals, called megafauna, were as bizarre as anything that lives there today. King of them all was the marsupial lion, a 130-kilogram meat-eater who lived alongside giant kangaroos, huge lizards called goannas, and Diprotodon, which resembled a three-tonne wombat.
After the arrival of humans on the continent, at least 45, 000 years ago, these weird and wonderful creatures began to die out. Experts blamed the colonizers, arguing that they launched a hunting ’ blitzkrieg’ that wiped out the megafauna(巨型动物)within a few generations.
But the animals may have survived for a lot longer than people thought, argues Judith Field of the University of Sydney, who has analyzed fossil remains. Her excavations seem to show that man and beast lived side by side for as long as 15,000 years.
She suspects that as Australia approached the most recent ice age, the growing cold and aridity turned much of the continent into a place where these large animals simply could not survive. Although man probably did hunt the large animals, the fact that they survived for so long argues against the blitzkrieg(闪电战)model, she adds.
Field and her colleagues collected animal bones from a ten-metre-deep section of earth at Cuddie Springs, New South Wales. They focused on bones from four layers: two with evidence of human settlement, such as stone tools, and two deeper ones with no evidence of tools.
They dated the bones by measuring the amounts of radioactive elements, such as uranium and thorium, that remained in the bones. They found that the various animal carcasses in each level would indeed have lived cheek by jowl with humans as recently as 30, 000 years ago. The team report their research in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Proponents of the blitzkrieg model had previously argued that the dating of the Cuddie Springs material was not certain, but Field says their research clears up the matter. Well-preserved bones at other sites have been very hard to find, probably because they are too dry, whereas Cuddie Springs is the site of an old lake bed.
A second group, reporting in the journal Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, has also unveiled evidence that climate change may have killed off many of Australia’s animals. By looking at smaller animal bones from the Darling Downs in Queensland, they show that their disappearance seems to have coincided with increasing dryness.
But the matter is not settled yet, particularly as the timing of humans’ first foray into Australia has still not been agreed. Fossil evidence frorr Lake Mungo in New South Wales suggests that they may have arrived 60,000 years ago. And it is possible that they hastened the megafauna’s demise by burning habitats to make way for primitive agriculture.
Field remains convinced, however, that it was climate that drove the animals to their death. "The arid zone grew to encompass 70% of the continent by 30,000 years ago," she says. "There would have been very few opportunities once it got dryer. "
Which of the following is INCORRECT according to the passage?
选项
A、The animal bones show that their disappearance seems to have coincided with increasing dryness.
B、Everybody is convinced that it is the climate change that leads to the extinction of some animals.
C、Field is convinced that it was climate that drove the animals to their death.
D、Both groups unveiled evidence that climate change may have killed off many of Australia’s animals.
答案
B
解析
推理题。气候变化导致了一些动物的灭亡,这是一些专家学者为了证明某些人持有的“人类捕杀导致了一些大型动物灭亡”的观点不正确而提出的反面观点,因此并不是所有人都持此种看法,故[B]正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/BeXK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Hesaiditwasimpossiblefor______amistakeinacomputer’scalculation,soyoucanrelyonthat.
ABCwilluseatimedelayduringthisyear’slivebroadcastoftheOscarsFeb.27inanefforttoscreenoutanyscandalousward
ABCwilluseatimedelayduringthisyear’slivebroadcastoftheOscarsFeb.27inanefforttoscreenoutanyscandalousward
Sugarlessyoghurtcouldhelpbeatbadbreath,toothdecayandgumdisease,sayscientists.Japaneseresearchersfoundeatingthe
WhenAmericansneedadvice,theyusually____________.
Thewell-offfamiliesusuallypreferredtomovetothemore______andlesspopulatedcountryside.
Itisusuallyeasiertofollowrulesofsocialbehavior______dependonone’sowntaste.
ConquerNegativityWhenyoufeelyou’vehadenoughoftheemotion,askyourselfifyou’rewillingtocarrythatnegativityw
Iknowhimbetterthananyofyou,andIcansay______:nobody’sgoingtomakehimworkanyfaster.
"Soonenough,nobodywillrememberlifebeforetheInternet.Whatdoesthisunavoidablefactmean?"Itiswiththissoberingque
随机试题
政策系统的利益输入包括
某建筑物建成于1990年6月,建筑面积4000m2,经济寿命40年,单位建筑面积的账面原值为2500元/m2,1990年6月和2005年6月相对1980年的建筑价格指数为108%和112%,残值率为5%,该建筑物2005年6月的现值为()。
根据企业所得税法的规定,关于无形资产说法不正确的有()。
某市一家小轿车生产企业为增值税一般纳税人,2009年度当年相关经营情况如下:(1)外购原材料,取得防伪税控系统开具的增值税专用发票,注明金额5000万元、增值税进项税额850万元,另支付购货运输费用200万元、装卸费用20万元、保险费用30万元;
总效用决定产品的价格,而边际效用决定消费的数量。()
导游服务集体三成员是地陪、全陪和司机。()
同事间建立信赖关系,合宜的做法是()。
消费模式是指在一定的生产力发展水平和特定的生产关系以及与其相适应的上层建筑的作用和制约下所形成的人们消费活动的基本规范。下列不是消费模式决定因素的一项是()。
A、B两站之间有一条铁路,甲、乙两列火车分别停在A站和B站,甲火车4分钟走的路程等于乙火车5分钟走的路程,乙火车上午8时整从B站开往A站,开出一段时间后,甲火车从A站出发开往B站,上午9时整两列火车相遇。相遇地点离A、B两站的距离比是:15:16,那么,甲
HelicopterMomsVS.Free-RangeKidsA)Wouldyouletyourfourth-graderridepublictransportationwithoutanadult?Probablynot
最新回复
(
0
)