首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would pro
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would pro
admin
2022-08-22
43
问题
At a recent debate in Washington about the rise of China, a U.S. career diplomat struck an optimistic note. Yes, China would probably soon overtake the United States as the world’s largest economy, he conceded, but the Middle Kingdom was unlikely to rival the United States anytime soon when it came to "soft power", or cultural influence and attractiveness.
Indeed, soft power is generally seen as a major asset in the foreign policy realm, helping countries achieve their goals without resorting to "hard power"—i.e.,
coercive
means. "Young people around the world," the diplomat confidently asserted, "still listen to American music, watch American movies and dream of coming to the United States."
Particularly in Latin America, that remains as true as ever, despite Donald Trump in the White House and a historic and irreversible shift of economic power away from the West towards Asia. The United States’ cultural influence and visibility stands unrivaled across Latin America. Chinese culture, by comparison, remains largely unknown and is usually met with indifference and a lack of interest. While some people are aware of China’s growing economic role in Latin America—it is already the largest trading partner of several of the region’s major economies, including Brazil, Chile and Peru—most would struggle to name a single Chinese contemporary singer, athlete or soap opera star. Latin America’s mass media busily reports even minor events in U.S. politics or cultural life, yet Chinese news remain the stuff of specialists.
Yet while U.S. soft power may provide some tangible economic benefits in Latin America—think of tourism to Disney World and New York, Netflix subscriptions and Starbucks sales—it has also shown to be a double-edged sword, particularly in the foreign policy realm. China’s
under-the-radar
approach in Latin America, by comparison, also brings important advantages, some of which may, paradoxically, be of greater strategic relevance in the long term. That is because, in a region traditionally concerned about U.S. meddling, strong cultural influence tends to inflate the perceived political and economic influence. While the United States’ de facto influence in Latin America has declined significantly over the past decade—partly due to China’s growing role in the region, but also because U.S. policymakers generally do not see the region as a priority—this change is barely reflected in the public debate, where the U.S. role remains outsized.
That often makes cooperating with the United States politically costly. When Brazil’s former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso reached, in 2000, a groundbreaking space cooperation deal with the United States, which would involve U.S. use of the Brazilian space agency’s launch site in Alcantara in Northern Brazil (its equatorial location allows reducing fuel costs of satellite launches by 30 percent), the opposition saw an opportunity to whip up anti-American nationalist sentiment by mischaracterizing the technology safeguards agreement (TSA) as a threat to Brazil’s sovereignty. Cardoso found himself accused of being an entreguista and canceled the project, which would have allowed Brazil to develop precious expertise in the area—increasingly important due to strong growth in the microsatellite sector crucial for GPS and internet communication. When the current government of Michel Temer took up the project recently, pressure again intensified, even though this time its successful conclusion is more likely. If the project partner had been China back then or today, it seems unlikely that the project would have faced as much political resistance.
This episode is starkly contrasted by how China can operate across Latin America and make strategic investments almost without any real concern for public opinion. When Chinese investors recently bought a third of Brazil’s electricity sector—a sector of tremendous strategic importance—the news barely made it to the front page of Brazilian newspapers.
Why was the U.S. career diplomat optimistic?
选项
A、Because China would probably soon overtake the United States as the world’s largest economy.
B、Because the United States would remain the world’s largest economy.
C、Because China was unlikely to rival the United States anytime soon when it came to "soft power".
D、Because the United States was unlikely to rival China anytime soon when it came to "soft power".
答案
C
解析
细节题。根据题干关键词定位第1段第1句,由第2句中的but分句可知,这位美国外交官认为中国在软实力方面还无法与美国匹敌。根据上下文,the Middle Kingdom应该指中国,故正确答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CB0O777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmuchas3%ofEarth’s【L2】______hasbeenurbanized,a
Theworldhasexperienced【L1】______urbangrowthintherecentdecades.Asmuchas3%ofEarth’s【L2】______hasbeenurbanized,a
HowmanypeopleareinfectedwithHIVvirus?
HowmanypeopleturnedupforSenatorNelson’sfirstEarthDayTeach-in?
Whydoesalackofsleepcausepeopletogainweight?
Uganda’seagernessforgenuinedevelopmentisreflectedinitsschoolchildren’ssmilesandinthefactthatsomanychildrenare
Childrenobesitymountsasjunkfoodpurveyorsbombardchildrenwithadvertising,evenatschool.
随机试题
患儿男,6岁。家长发现其性格异常3年前来就诊。患儿自幼与同龄人不同,与父母的亲密感差,不喜欢与同学及小朋友一块玩耍,2岁时才可以说两个字的单词,语言单调,常独自摆弄小铅笔,不许别人干扰,如小铅笔被别人拿走,则哭闹不安。遇到困难不主动寻求帮助,肚子痛也不告诉
楚天公司由于工作失误,将应交下属工厂A的任务误发至下属工厂B。B即据此与建筑单位C签订合同。该合同在执行过程中,楚天公司发现工作失误遂通知B停止执行合同。B与C因此遭受损失。在这种情况下()。
建筑工程设计是建造单体或群体建筑所需的全部设计文件,它主要包括()几部分。
车库、停车场等车流量较多的场地,其车辆出入口距学校建筑出入口不应小于()。
目前我国纳税人纳税申报的最主要方式是( )。
英国一项调查显示,来自富有家庭的人都爱阅读。而大部分来自贫困家庭的人从不阅读,而沉迷于电视和网络。如果上述表述为真,则以下哪项可以判断真假?
A、 B、 C、 D、 B仔细观察第一组图,会发现复杂的线段依次把图形划分为8,7,6,5,4个部分,依此规律,下一个应分为3个部分,B正确。
甲、乙、丙、丁是同班同学。四个人对此次考试成绩分别作了如下预测:甲:我班同学考试都及格了。乙:丁考试没及格。丙:我班有人考试没及格。丁:乙考试也没及格。已知只有一个人说假话,则可推断以下哪项断定是真的?
我们兴国之要,党和国家兴旺发达、长治久安的根本要求是()
维持生活
最新回复
(
0
)