首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2011-05-29
53
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross-examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the Continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal"— essentially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this was eventually abandoned, the two systems parted company. On the Continent, church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jury. The jurymen were often illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their Constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, American lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare them themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case; the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed lo meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. By being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
"The British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice," implies that ______.
选项
A、the British legal system can de the basic job well—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent
B、the British legal system is worse than the Continental legal system
C、the British legal system is often considered to be not very fair
D、the British legal system is very efficient
答案
C
解析
这是一道推断题,句意为“英国审判制度与其说是严肃执法,倒不如说是一场游戏。”其言外之意就是“英国法律制度并不公正。”于是,正确答案应当为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CC6O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Readthearticlebelowaboutrelationshipwithcustomers.Foreachquestion(23-28)ontheoppositepage,choosethecorrectanswe
Readtheadbelowaboutautoinsuranceproducts.Itisthecontentofaletterabouttheconfirmationoffollow-upafterabusin
Lookatthechartbelow.Itshowstheproduction,salesandrejectionofproductsineightcompanies(A-H)ofagivenmonth.Whi
TheDevelopmentProgrammeManagementProcessAEstablishingareviewboardfordevelopmentsBEstablishingreviewcriteriaandm
Callingcurrentmanagersandmanagementtrainees!JointheCorlissInstituteforunlimitedaccesstoourmanagementdatabaseww
Whichofthefollowingisadisadvantageofthestrategyemployedintheexperimentalscholarlymethodscourse?
Contradictorytopopularbelief,recentsurveysshowthatbesideshousewives,manycollegestudentsarealso______tosoapoper
Finally,carefulprioritizationisnoalternativetotheadequate______ofthesciencebase.
Earthquakes66.AttwominutestonooninSeptember1of1923,thegreatclockinTokyostopped.67.TokyoBayShookasifh
TheAleuts(阿留申人)werenamedsobyRussians,buttheycallthemselvesUnanganwhichmeans"thepeople."Theyarenativeinhabit
随机试题
A.商陆B.芦荟C.大黄D.芫花治疗血热吐血、衄血,可选用的药物是
查找癌细胞的痰液标本不能及时送检,固定选用的溶液是
经过()年的努力,我国将东北地区建设成为体制机制较为完善的重要经济增长区域。
甲公司系增值税一般纳税人,不动产适用的增值税税率为10%,按净利润的10%提取盈余公积。甲公司采用成本模式对投资性房地产进行后续计量。不考虑其他因素,有关资料如下:资料一:2×18年12月18日甲公司与乙公司签订租赁合同,甲公司将一栋办公楼整体出租给乙公
合同的权利义务终止,不影响合同中结算和清理条款的效力。
就对个人和民族的作用而言,文化素质主要是通过形成特定的文化氛围,浸润其心灵,提升其境界;人文精神则主要是通过具体的价值意识,指导其行为,推动其前进。换言之,文化素质的作用是间接、抽象的;人文精神的作用则比较直接、具体。因此()。
从哲学的角度说明材料l中主人最后为什么挤不出牛奶来?阅读材料3,过江:者“引婴儿而欲投之江中”和鲁国人想迁到越国去卖草鞋违背了哪些哲学原理?
要在一个窗体的某个按钮的单击事件上添加动作,可以创建的宏是
"CollegeCampus"Whatdoesthewomanagreetodo?
Dangerscanbecausedbytheuseofsuchabstractwordsas"beauty","crime"and"【1】______".Thedangerlies【1】
最新回复
(
0
)