首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A triumph for scientific freedom This week’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine—Australians Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warr
A triumph for scientific freedom This week’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine—Australians Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warr
admin
2010-01-10
30
问题
A triumph for scientific freedom
This week’s Nobel Prize winners in medicine—Australians Barry J. Marshall and J. Robin Warren— toppled the conventional wisdom in more ways than one. They proved that most ulcers were caused by a lowly bacterium, which was an outrageous idea at the time. But they also showed that if science is to advance, scientists need the freedom and the funding to let their imaginations roam.
Let’s start with the Nobel pair’s gut instincts. In the late 1970s, the accepted medical theory was that ulcers were caused by stress, smoking, and alcohol. But when pathologist Warren cranked up his microscope to a higher-than-usual magnification, he was surprised to find S-shaped bacteria in specimens taken from patients with gastritis. By 1982, Marshall, only 30 years old and still in training at Australia’s Royal Perth Hospital, and Warren, the more seasoned physician to whom he was assigned, were convinced that the bacteria were living brazenly in a sterile, acidic zone—the stomach—that medical texts had declared uninhabitable.
Marshall and Warren’s attempts to culture the bacteria repeatedly failed. But then they caught a lucky breaker rather, outbreak. Drug-resistant staph was sweeping through the hospital. Preoccupied with the infections, lab techs left Marshall’s and Warren’s petri dishes to languish in a dark, humid incubator over the long Easter holiday. Those five days were enough time to grow a crop of strange, translucent microbes.
Marshall later demonstrated that ulcer-afflicted patients harbored the same strain of bacteria. In 1983, he began successfully treating these sufferers with antibiotics and bismuth (the active ingredient in Pepto-Bismol). That same year, at an infectious disease conference in Belgium, a questioner in the audience asked Marshall if he thought bacteria caused at least some stomach ulcers. Marshall shot back that he believed bacteria caused all stomach ulcers.
Those were fighting words. The young physician from Perth was telling the field’s academically pedigreed experts that they had it all wrong. "It was impossible to displace the dogma," Marshall explained to me in a jaunty, wide-ranging conversation several years ago. "Their agenda was to shut me up and get me out of gastroenterology and into general practice in the outback."
At first, Marshall couldn’t produce the crowning scientific proof of his claim: inducing ulcers in animals by feeding them the bacterium. So in 1984, as he later reported in the Medical Journal of Australia. "a 32-year-old man, a light smoker and social drinker who had no known gastrointestinal disease or family history of peptic ulceration"—a superb test subject, in other words—" swallowed the growth from’ a flourishing three-day culture of the isolate."
The volunteer was Marshall himself, Five days later, and for seven mornings in a row, he experienced the classic and unpretty symptoms of severe gastritis.
Helicobacter pylori have since been blamed not only for the seething inflammation ,of ulcers but also for virtually all stomach cancer. Marshall’s antibiotic treatment has replaced surgery as standard care. And the wise guy booed off the stage at scientific meetings has just won the Nobel Prize.
What does all this have to do with scientific freedom? Today, US government funding favors "hypothesis-driven" rather than "hypothesis-generating" research. In the former, a scientist starts with a safe supposition and conducts the experiment to prove or disprove the idea. "If you want to get research funding; you better make sure that you’ve got the experiment half done," Marshall told me. "You have to prove it works before they’ll fund you to test it out."
By contrast, in hypothesis-generating research, the scientist inches forward by hunch, gathering clues and speculating on their meaning. The payoff is never clear. With today’s crimped science budgets and intense competition for grants, such risky research rarely gets funded. Proceeding on intuition, Mar- shall told me, "is a luxury that not many researchers have."
It helps, he added, to be an outsider. "The people who have got a stake in the old technology arc never the ones to embrace the new technology. It’s always someone a bit on the periphery--who hasn’t got anything to gain by the status quo—who is interested in changing it."
In 1983, Warren began successfully treating sufferers with antibiotics and bismuth.
选项
A、Y
B、N
C、NG
答案
B
解析
从第四段前两句话可知本句话错误
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CCt7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
【B1】【B9】
【B1】【B11】
Fromthepassagewelearnhowadigitalcameraworkswithsomeprinciplesandprocesses.Digitalcamerasusuallystoreimagesi
Whatthepassagetellsuscanbesummarizedbythestatementthat______.Intermarriageanddifferentoccupationsplayanimpor
Fromtheevolutionarypointofview,______.Theauthor’smainpurposeinwritingthispassageisto______.
A、DifferentFormsofExerciseB、Exercise—TheRoadtoHealthC、Running—APopularFormofSportD、ScientificEvidenceofHealthBe
A、Theyusemanydifferentmethods.B、Allbirdsfollowmajorgeographicalfeatures.C、Allbirdsusetheirmemoryofamap.D、Weh
Itcanbeinferredfromthearticleabouttheimpactofelectronicmediaonpresidentialelectionsthatbefore1960TVhadlittl
Digitaltechnologiesreallybegantotakeformwhen______.Theauthorimpliesthatexcitementoverthedigitalrevolutionmay
Thispassageismainlyaboutsomesocialandculturalchangesof1970sand1980s.Inthe1980s,theprogramonwhichpeopletal
随机试题
维护社会治安秩序的工作主要包括()。
根据现行宪法和有关法律的规定,我国人民检察院领导体制实行【】
大阴唇局部受伤时,易发生出血,是因为其解剖特点为()
执业药师应进德修业,珍视声誉,正确的行为包括
当火灾发生后,现场人员可从设置在附近的消火栓箱内取出水带和水枪,将水带与消火栓栓口连接,接上水枪,打开消火栓的阀门,直接出水灭火。这属于()消防给水系统。
儿童对形状形成正确知觉的关键期是()岁。
人类语言采用声音作为手段,而不采用手势或图画,也不是偶然的。人类的视觉最发达,可是语言诉之于听觉。这是因为一切倚赖视觉的手段,要发挥作用,离不开光线,夜里不成,黑暗的地方或者有障碍物的地方也不成,声音则白天黑夜都可以发挥作用,也不容易受阻碍。手势之类,距离
商业银行的负债业务是形成资金来源的业务。()
在下述关于数据库系统的叙述中,正确的是()。
Itneveroccurredtohimthatheandhisdoingwerenotofthemostintenseandfascinatinginteresttoanyonewithwhomhecame
最新回复
(
0
)