首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the stu
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the stu
admin
2013-09-28
89
问题
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the students—and their parents—make of this exercise. "Wait," I imagine them saying, "we’ve just paid you tens of thousands of dollars in tuition to take courses at your school, and now you’re asking us to tell you if the teachers you hired are any good? If you didn’t already know that they’re first class, you had no right taking our money."
Who are these successful teachers? Ph.D.s from first-class programs, of course, but that’s because college teaching and research require a high level of specialist knowledge. Beyond this knowledge, college teachers do a good job because of qualities that they already have when they complete their undergraduate education: a high level of intelligence, enthusiasm for ideas and an ability to communicate. With faculties of the "best and the brightest" from the pool of under-graduates, colleges can be confident of good quality teaching. The professional community itself is, on the whole, able to ensure a high level of competence among its members.
These reflections lead me to a simple proposal. Adopt the same model for grade school and high school teaching that works for colleges. Currently, few of the best students from the best colleges are grade school or high school teachers.
Top doctoral programs have far more applicants than they can accept, and many excellent students don’t apply, either because they do not have a high enough level of specialized skills or because they do not want to risk the terrible job market for college teachers. Such students would form a natural pool for non-college teaching if the pay and working conditions were anywhere near the level of the college average.
So why not make use of all this talent to develop an elite class of professionals—like those who teach in our colleges—and give them primary responsibility for K-12 education? One objection is that teaching children and teenagers requires a set of social/emotional abilities—to empathize, to nurture, to discipline—that have little connection with the intellectual qualities of the "best" college students. But there is no reason to think that people who are smart, articulate and enthusiastic about ideas are in general less likely to have these non-intellectual abilities.
It’s sometimes urged that a high level of intellectual ability is not needed to understand high-school, not to say grade-school, subjects. This is true, but with our current low standards it is not unheard of to find teachers who lack even this basic understanding.
Moreover, it requires considerable intelligence to respond adequately to the questions of bright students. Most important, the greatest intellectual challenge of teaching at any level is to find ways of presenting the content effectively. More intelligent teachers will be both more likely to develop on their own better methods of teaching and better able to understand and apply any wisdom that may come to them from above.
In every other area of intellectual endeavor, we have succeeded by creating a professional class drawn from those who have excelled as college undergraduates. We need to do the same for primary and secondary education.
From The New York Times, June 7, 2012
Which of the following is NOT true about the doctoral programs according to the author?
选项
A、There is a decreasing number of people who want to apply for doctoral programs.
B、The reason students don’t want to apply for it is that college teachers do not make big money.
C、The other reason students don’t want to apply for it is that they do not have a high level of specialized skills.
D、It is not wise to apply for doctoral programs because there are enough college teachers already.
答案
D
解析
本题为细节题。第四段中说到博士课程越来越受到众人的冷落是因为——申请者的专业知识不够扎实,博士毕业以后的就业前景不乐观。因此D答案所谓的“大学教师人数已足够”是无中生有,文章并未提及。而A、B、C选项均符合大意。因此正确答案为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CNLK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Accordingtothepassage,whatdoestheburningtorchsymbolize?
Oneoftheaimsofteachingscienceis,throughlearning,toenablestudentstodevelopacompletepersonalitybycreativity,ho
WhichofthefollowingsentencesisINCORRECT?
Thefactthatblindpeoplecan"see"thingsusingotherpartsoftheirbodies【C1】______theireyesmayhelpustounderstandou
Whatarethespeakersmainlydiscussing?
Themanagingdirectortookthe______fortheaccident,althoughitwasnotreallyhisfault.
Janethaseventuallydecidedtogoona
She______seriouslyafterherstemstrucktherocksbutfortunatelynothingreallyhappened.
WemetMaryandherhusbandatapartytwomonthsago.______we’vehadnofurthercommunication.(2004年考试真题)
随机试题
Whatisthetotalnumberofintegersbetween100and300thataredivisibleby3?
螺杆泵是在转子和()组成的一个个密闭的独立的腔室基础上工作的。
A.严格要求等渗B.要求等渗或偏高渗C.要求渗透压相当于0.6%~1.5%的氯化钠D.不能用氯化钠调整渗透压E.要求无菌,可以使用抑菌剂一般眼用溶液剂
毛、麻等火灾属于()。
背景资料某新建住宅楼工程,建筑面积43200m2,砖混结构,投资额25910万元。建设单位自行编制了招标工程量清单等招标文件,其中部分条款内容为:本工程实行施工总承包模式;承包范围为土建、水电安装、内外装修及室外道路和小区园林景观;施工质量标准为合格;工
从重从快惩处的前提是()。
设函数f(x)在点x=a处可导,则函数|f(x)|在点x=a处不可导的充分条件是().
某计算机系统由下图所示的部件构成,假定每个部件的千小时可靠度都为R,则该系统的千小时可靠度为(2)。
Thecoursenormallyattracts20studentsperyear,______uptohalfwillbefromorient.
【S1】【S8】
最新回复
(
0
)