首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the stu
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the stu
admin
2013-09-28
54
问题
As at most colleges, our semester at Notre Dame ends with student evaluations of their teachers. Each time I wonder what the students—and their parents—make of this exercise. "Wait," I imagine them saying, "we’ve just paid you tens of thousands of dollars in tuition to take courses at your school, and now you’re asking us to tell you if the teachers you hired are any good? If you didn’t already know that they’re first class, you had no right taking our money."
Who are these successful teachers? Ph.D.s from first-class programs, of course, but that’s because college teaching and research require a high level of specialist knowledge. Beyond this knowledge, college teachers do a good job because of qualities that they already have when they complete their undergraduate education: a high level of intelligence, enthusiasm for ideas and an ability to communicate. With faculties of the "best and the brightest" from the pool of under-graduates, colleges can be confident of good quality teaching. The professional community itself is, on the whole, able to ensure a high level of competence among its members.
These reflections lead me to a simple proposal. Adopt the same model for grade school and high school teaching that works for colleges. Currently, few of the best students from the best colleges are grade school or high school teachers.
Top doctoral programs have far more applicants than they can accept, and many excellent students don’t apply, either because they do not have a high enough level of specialized skills or because they do not want to risk the terrible job market for college teachers. Such students would form a natural pool for non-college teaching if the pay and working conditions were anywhere near the level of the college average.
So why not make use of all this talent to develop an elite class of professionals—like those who teach in our colleges—and give them primary responsibility for K-12 education? One objection is that teaching children and teenagers requires a set of social/emotional abilities—to empathize, to nurture, to discipline—that have little connection with the intellectual qualities of the "best" college students. But there is no reason to think that people who are smart, articulate and enthusiastic about ideas are in general less likely to have these non-intellectual abilities.
It’s sometimes urged that a high level of intellectual ability is not needed to understand high-school, not to say grade-school, subjects. This is true, but with our current low standards it is not unheard of to find teachers who lack even this basic understanding.
Moreover, it requires considerable intelligence to respond adequately to the questions of bright students. Most important, the greatest intellectual challenge of teaching at any level is to find ways of presenting the content effectively. More intelligent teachers will be both more likely to develop on their own better methods of teaching and better able to understand and apply any wisdom that may come to them from above.
In every other area of intellectual endeavor, we have succeeded by creating a professional class drawn from those who have excelled as college undergraduates. We need to do the same for primary and secondary education.
From The New York Times, June 7, 2012
Which of the following is NOT true about the doctoral programs according to the author?
选项
A、There is a decreasing number of people who want to apply for doctoral programs.
B、The reason students don’t want to apply for it is that college teachers do not make big money.
C、The other reason students don’t want to apply for it is that they do not have a high level of specialized skills.
D、It is not wise to apply for doctoral programs because there are enough college teachers already.
答案
D
解析
本题为细节题。第四段中说到博士课程越来越受到众人的冷落是因为——申请者的专业知识不够扎实,博士毕业以后的就业前景不乐观。因此D答案所谓的“大学教师人数已足够”是无中生有,文章并未提及。而A、B、C选项均符合大意。因此正确答案为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CNLK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Makesureyou______yourparentsimmediatelyafteryouarrive,andsointhiscasetheywouldnotworryaboutyousomuch.
Peoplehavebeenpaintingpicturesforatleast30,000years.Theearliestpictureswerepaintedbypeoplewhohuntedanimals.T
Itwasrecentlyreportedinanewspaperthatsixstudentswhosharedadormatalocaluniversityhiredacleanertodolaundry
Theeldestchildisthoroughly______becausetheyalwaysgivehimwhateverhewants.
Cancomputersreason?Reasoningrequirestheindividualtotakeagivensetoffactsanddrawcorrectconclusions.Unfortunately
ApplesApplesarethesecondmostvaluablefruitcropintheUnitedStates,afteroranges./Autumnisatimewhenfreshapp
Ofthevariouspurposesmoneyserves,someessentiallydependuponthe______thatitsvalueisreallyconstantoveraperiodof
AftertheviolentearthquakethatshookLosAngelesin1994,earthquakescientistshadgoodnewstoreport.Thedamageanddeath
WemetMaryandherhusbandatapartytwomonthsago.______we’vehadnofurthercommunication.(2004年考试真题)
______theconsequence,Iwillbeonyourside.
随机试题
水泥熟料中加入石膏主要对水泥起到()作用。
下列哪种过程属于主动转运过程【】
A.法律B.行政法规C.地方性法规D.部门规章湖南省颁布的《湖南省药品和医疗器械流通监督管理条例》是()。
期初正常类贷款中,在报告期末分类为关注类、次级类、可疑类、损失类的贷款余额之和的是()。
阅读下面材料,回答问题。李老师是某中学小有名气的数学老师。他备课非常认真,自己对课上和作业里的每道题都事先演练,课堂讲解清晰明确,教学效果良好,课外作业坚持全批全改,发现作业有错误就要求学生订正并罚抄10遍,每次测试都进行细致的质量分析,及时在班
“家风”,这一中国传统文化精神教育的深刻词汇,因央视的《新春走基层》节目,重新________人们的视野,成为公众热议的话题。民众的强烈共鸣,是对传统文化的一次________,对理想信念和价值追求的一次深刻追问,对社会主义核心价值观的重新________
下列程序的运行结果是【】。main(){unionEXAMPLE{struct{intx;inty;}in;inta;
Apersonwhoagreestoserveasmediatorbetweentwowarringfactionsattherequestofbothabandonsbysoagreeingtherightl
A、Paythebillsrightaway.B、Readthemagazinesveryquickly.C、Sortthearticlesintocategoriesforlaterreference.D、Stopb
A、Thedevelopmentofonlinevideos.B、Thelimitationofnewlaws.C、ThelowerqualitiesofDVDitself.D、Theuseofhandheldvid
最新回复
(
0
)