首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy(冷漠) and stagnation(呆滞). To
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy(冷漠) and stagnation(呆滞). To
admin
2010-02-26
34
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy(冷漠) and stagnation(呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness(分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perception of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-making organizations and others for not-fur-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in term of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organization, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
The passage suggests that in for-profit organizations_______.
选项
A、there is no end of conflict
B、expression of different opinions is encouraged
C、decisions must be justifiable
D、success lies in general agreement
答案
D
解析
本题为逻辑推断题,由第四段可知,分歧能导致一些不明智的决策,即成功依赖于意见上的一致,所以选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CbOK777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Manyelectricappliancesdon’tliberatemodernwomenfromhouseworkbecause______.Thegoodsadvertisedinwomen’smagazinesa
Therearetwobasicwaystoseegrowth:Oneasaproduct,theotherasaprocess.Peoplehave(36)______viewedpersonalgrowth
ItcanbeinferredthatMichaelTenet’sattitudetowardglobalizationisprobably______.ThewordsbyJaniceYaweemeanthat___
A、Theyhelpthestudentstobecomemorecooperative.B、Theyareverygoodentertainmentforstudents.C、Theymakelotsofmoney
A、Taxi-driver.B、Herhusband.C、Airportstaff.D、Waiter.AW:WestLondonAirTerminal,please.Ihavetobethemby11:10.M:I
A、Thewomanenjoyedthemovieverymuch.B、ThewomansawahorrormovielastSaturday.C、Themanaskedthewomantobecarefula
A、It’snotalwaysclearwhypeoplebehaveincertainways.B、Peopleusuallyblameothersfortheirmistakes.C、Certaincondition
Thepassageismainlyaboutthedifferencesbetweenconventionalandorganicfarming.Organicfoodisnotnecessarilybetterth
Istronglybelievethat____________(正是为了人民的缘故,中国应该很强大).
随机试题
患者常轻叫一声,突然跌倒,口吐涎沫或血沫,牙关紧闭,甚则尖叫,短暂即清醒。曾将牙齿咬断,每月平均发作10多次,甚时日发2次,历经中西医治疗效果不佳。平时头昏目眩,大便不畅,痰多,苔薄滑,舌根腻,脉弦滑。属何病( )。
布氏杆菌的致病物质是
某市大型商场为增值税一般纳税人,具有金银首饰经营资质。2013年12月商场珠宝部发生如下经济业务:(1)销售给个人消费者纯金戒指共取得零售收入1898850元。随同纯金戒指销售向顾客收取优质服务费8700元,均开具普通发票,货款已收到;(2)将钻石饰品
张载曾庄严宣告“为天地立心,为生民立命,为往圣继绝学,为万世开太平”;顾炎武在明清之际发出“天下兴亡,匹夫有责”的呼吁……上述言论说明宋明理学影响中国文化()。
孙某丈夫外出做买卖五年未归,也没有任何音讯,孙某欲改嫁,下面说法正确的是()。
下列诗人与其称呼的对应中,不正确的是()。
设u=f(x+y,x-y,z)由确定z为x,y的函数,又f连续可偏导,p可导,且p(y+z)-p(x+z)-1≠0,求.
幂级数x+的和函数及定义域是____________.
为了使命令按钮在界面运行时显示“运行”,需要设置该命令按钮的哪个属性
【B1】【B9】
最新回复
(
0
)