首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on th
At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on th
admin
2013-01-28
89
问题
At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on the history of gun ownership, gun use, and gun violence in the United States. Our purpose was to consider how social science history might contribute to the public debate over gun control and gun rights. To date, we have had little impact on that debate. It has been dominated by mainstream social scientists and historians, especially scholars such as Gary Kleck, John Lott, and Michael Bellesiles, whose work, despite profound flaws, is politically congenial to either opponents or proponents of gun control. Kleck and Mark Gertz, for instance, argue on the basis of their widely cited survey that gun owners prevent numerous crimes each year in the United States by using firearms to defend themselves and their property. If their survey respondents are to be believed, American gun owners shot 100, 000 criminals in 1994 in self-defense — a preposterous number. Lott claims on the basis of his statistical analysis of recent crime rates that laws allowing private individuals to carry concealed firearms deter murders, rapes, and robberies, because criminals are afraid to attack potentially armed victims. However, he biases his results by confining his analysis to the year between 1977 and 1992, when violent crime rates had peaked and varied little from year to year. He reports only regression models that support his thesis and neglects to mention that each of those models find a positive relationship between violent crime and real income, and an inverse relationship between violent crime and unemployment.
Contrary to Kleck and Lott, Bellesiles insists that guns and America’s "gun culture" are responsible for America’s high rates of murder. In Belleville’s opinion, relatively few Americans owned guns before the 1850s or know how to use, maintain, or repair them. As a result, he says, guns contributed little to the homicide rate, especially among white, which was low everywhere, even in the South and on the frontier, where historians once assume guns and murder went hand in hand. According to Bellesiles, these patterns changed dramatically after the Mexican War and especially after the Civil War, when gun ownership became widespread and cultural changes encouraged the use of handguns to command respect and resolve personal and political disputes. The result was an unprecedented wave of gun-related homicides that never truly abated. To this day, the United States has the highest homicide rate of any industrial democracy. Belleville’s low estimates of gun ownership in early America conflict, however, with those of every historian who has previously studied the subject and have thus far proven irreproducible. Every homicide statistic he presents is either misleading or wrong.
Given the influence of Kleck, kott, Bellesiles and other partisan scholars on the debate over gun control and gun rights, we felt a need to pull together what social science historians have learned to date about the history of gun ownership and gun violence in America, and to consider what research methods and projects might increase our knowledge in the near future.
Which of following statements is true about the public debate over gun network?
选项
A、It has little influence on the forum sponsored by the Crime and Justice network.
B、Neither supporters nor opponents of gun control cite the works of scholars.
C、The works of mainstream social scientists have great impact on it.
D、Many social science historians have so far failed to take part in it.
答案
C
解析
本题中,A、D两项与文章的意思不相符;B项在文中未被提及。从文中的“To date…been dominated by mainstream social scientists and historians.”可知,主流社会学家对枪支管制的影响很大。因此C项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Ck1O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Inrecentyears,manyAmericansofbothsexesandvariousageshavebecomeinterestedinimprovingtheirbodies.Theyhavebecom
OnesillyquestionIsimplycannottolerateis"Howdoyoufeel?"Usuallythequestionisaskedofamaninaction-amanwalkin
Whyshouldanyonewanttoread_____ofbooksbygreatauthorswhentherealpleasurecomesfromreadingtheoriginals.
Itisstrictly_______thataccesstoconfidentialdocumentsisdeniedtoallbutafew.
TheEuropeanUnionrevealedonJanuary23rdhowitplanstosavetheworld.Amammothclimate-changeplanspellsoutindetailh
(66)Highunemploymentrates,especialamongyoungworkers,haveledtoprotestsincountriesasvariedasLatvia,Chile,Greece
Fastfood,amainstayofAmericaneatingfordecades,mayhavereachedaplateauintheUnitedStatesasthematuringbaby-boom
Whentheletterfromhiswifearrived,he______thecontentscarefully.Becauseshehadn’tansweredhisquestion,hewasangry
Asthetrialwenton,thestorybehindthemurderslowly______itself.
InJuly,almostunnoticedbythenationalpress,adeadlybirdvirusarrivedonapheasantfarminSurrey.ExpertsfromtheDepa
随机试题
下列哪一项不属于治安警察的职责?()
病变的血管可能为该患者发病时,有下列哪一项表现对本病定位诊断有特殊意义
关于岩土工程勘察报告成果的说法,错误的是:
(2005年)已知空气的密度ρ为1.205kg/m3,动力黏度(动力黏滞系数)μ为1.83×10-5Pa.s,那么它的运动黏度(运动黏滞系数)v为()。
风险识别所用的核对表可以根据历史资料,以往类似项目所积累的知识,以及其他信息来源着手制订。()可以作为风险核对表使用。
实验室某玻璃瓶中盛有质量为140g的酒精。已知酒精的热值为3×107J/kg,水的比热容为4.2×103J/(kg.℃)。试求:将这些酒精完全燃烧,可放出多少热量?
设f(x),g(x)在区间[-a,a](a>0)上连续,g(x)为偶函数,且f(x)满足条件f(x)+f(-x)=A(A为常数)证明
请使用VC6或使用【答题】菜单打开考生文件夹proj1下的工程proj1。程序中位于每个“//ERROR****found****”之后的一行语句有错误,请加以改正。改正后程序的输出结果应为:value=63number=1
在考生文件夹下的数据库文件“samp1.accdb”中已建立了表对象“tEmployee”。请按以下操作要求,完成表的建立和修改。建立一个新表,结构如表3—3所示,主关键字为“ID”,表名为“tSell”,将表3—4所示数据输入到“tSell
(1)Evertryandgetatwo-year-oldtopickuptrash?Thiswasourgoalthispastweekendonaglorious,clearSaturday,themorn
最新回复
(
0
)