首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The economy may be troubled, but one area is thriving: social media. They begin with Facebook and extend through a dizzying arra
The economy may be troubled, but one area is thriving: social media. They begin with Facebook and extend through a dizzying arra
admin
2019-09-23
32
问题
The economy may be troubled, but one area is thriving: social media. They begin with Facebook and extend through a dizzying array of companies that barely existed five years ago: Twitter, LinkedIn, Groupon, Yammer — and the list goes on. These companies are mostly private, but have attracted the ardent attention of Wall Street and investors, with Facebook now worth purportedly US$75 billion and Groupon valued at close to US$25 billion.
There can be little doubt that these companies enrich their founders as well as some investors. But do they add anything to overall economic activity? While jobs in social media are growing fast, there were only about 21,000 listings last spring, a tiny fraction of the 150 million-member U.S. workforce. So do social-media tools enhance productivity or help us bridge the wealth divide? Or are they simply entertaining socially, and diverting us when it comes to national economic health?
The answers are vital, because billions of dollars in investment capital are being spent on these ventures, and if we are to have a productive future economy, that capital needs to grow the economic pie — and not just among the elite of Silicon Valley and Wall Street.
The problem is that these tools are so new that it is extremely difficult to answer the questions definitively. Flash back nearly 20 years and the same question was being asked about the first Internet wave. Were Netscape and the Web enhancing our economy, or were people just spending more time at work checking out ESPN.com? Official statistics weren’t designed to capture the benefits, and didn’t capture them until statistics experts at the Federal Reserve, urged on by Alan Greenspan, refined the way they measured productivity. As a result of these somewhat controversial innovations, the late 1990s became a period of substantial technology-driven gains.
It is possible that the same gap exists today, that social-media tools are indeed laying the groundwork for new industries and jobs, but aren’t yet registering on the statistical radar. Many companies believe social media make them more competitive. Ford and Zappos, for instance, use Twitter to market their products and address consumer complaints.
One big question is what proportion of that benefit will be captured economically by consumers vs. corporations. Sure, social media allow people to compare prices and quality and assess which companies are good to work for and where jobs might be. They also may enhance education and idea sharing, but the caveat is that the people who use these tools are the ones with higher education and income to spend on technology, not the tens of millions whose position in today’s world has eroded so sharply. According to a recent Pew Foundation study, only 45 percent of adults making less than US$30,000 have access to broadband, which is an essential component of using content-rich social media effectively.
And that is the rub. Like so many things these days, social media contribute to economic bifurcation. Dynamic companies are benefiting from these tools, even if the gains are tough to nail down in specific figures. Many individuals are benefiting too, using LinkedIn to find jobs and Groupon to find deals. But now, the irony is that social media widen the social divide, making it even harder for the have-nots to navigate. They allow those with jobs to do them more effectively and companies that are profiting to profit more. But so far, they have done little to aid those who are being left behind. They are, in short, business as usual.
Which of the following statements about social-media companies is NOT true?
选项
A、Most of them are private.
B、Their value is increasing fast.
C、They are receiving huge sums of investment.
D、They contribute greatly to the labor market.
答案
D
解析
推断题。第1段第3句提到这些公司大多是私营,引起了华尔街和投资者的热情关注,可以排除A和C。第2段第1句说到这些公司让他们的创始人和一些投资者收获颇丰,结合第1段最后一句用Facebook和Groupon的例子,可以推断他们的价值快速增长,所以排除B。第2段第3句用数据说明社交媒体为劳动市场提供的职位仅占全美劳工总数的一小部分,由此可以判断D的表述不正确,故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CtMO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
A、Yahooe-mail.B、Searchingengine.C、OnlineMSNcheating.D、Addressbook.A
1.Snowisasubjectofgreatinteresttoweatherexperts.2.Snowfallsinextremenorthernandsouthernareasoftheworldthr
TheblackpeopledidnotvoteinAmericain1941.
TheblackpeopledidnotvoteinAmericain1941.
LegalityofVietnameseBlogger’sReleaseQuestionedVocabularyandExpressionspropagandaexpelevasionharassmentA
Whichofthefollowingisclosestinmeaningtothestatementyou’vejustheard?
Whatdoeslayaboutsmeaninthefollowingsentence"Thatsoundslikeagoodthing,certainlycomparedwiththecommonpublicima
Howdidtheemployeesreactwhentheyheardaboutthesellingofthecompany?
Whatwillbethenextrevolutionaboutforsuperpowers?
随机试题
阅读茅盾《香市》中的一段文字,然后回答下列小题。在我看来,这所谓“南洋武术班”的几套把式比起从前“香市”里的打拳头卖膏药的玩意来,委实是好看得多了。要是放在十多年前,怕不是挤得满场没有个空隙儿么?但是今天第一天也只有二百来看客。往常“香市”的主角——
所有成形特征需要什么类型面?
国民收入的增加量与投资最初的增加量之比,称为
A.发热、贫血、出血B.出血C.贫血D.发热、贫血、出血、淋巴结或肝脾肿大急性白血病的主要临床表现是
生态平衡是指在一定时间内生态系统中的生物和环境之间、生物各个种群之间,通过能量流动、物质循环和信息传递,使它们相互之间达到高度适应、协调和统一的状态。在一定限度的干扰下,生态系统能通过自我调节恢复到初始的稳定状态,一旦超过就会衰退乃至崩溃。根据上述定义,下
德胜公司注册地在萨摩国并在该国设有总部和分支机构,但主要营业机构位于中国深圳,是一家由台湾地区凯旋集团公司全资设立的法人企业。由于决策失误,德胜公司在中国欠下700万元债务。对此,下列哪一选项是正确的?(2008年卷三第2题)
下列有关填土要求的叙述中正确的是( )。
以下属于全陪和地陪共有的职责是()。
不少心理学家们一直致力于研究智力的实质,从而能够有效地评估智力的个体差异。请简要总结一下,传统智力测验有哪些问题?
对声音波形采样时,采样频率越高,声音文件的数据量()。
最新回复
(
0
)