首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
admin
2019-08-17
29
问题
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example, the wealthy oil enclave of Abu Dhabi brags that it has planted more than 130 million trees—each of which does its duty in absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, this artificial forest in the desert also consumes huge quantities of irrigation water produced, or recycled, from expensive desalination plants. The trees may allow its leaders to wear a halo at international meetings, but the rude fact is that they are an energy-intensive beauty strip, like most of so-called green capitalism. And, while we’re at it, let’s just ask: What if the buying and selling of carbon credits and pollution offsets fails to reduce global warming? What exactly will motivate governments and global industries then to join hands in a crusade to reduce emissions through regulation and taxation?
Kyoto-type climate diplomacy assumes that all the major actors will recognize an overriding common interest in gaining harness over the runaway greenhouse effect. But global warming is not War of the Worlds, where invading Martians are dedicated to annihilating all of humanity without distinction. Climate change, instead, will initially produce dramatically unequal impacts across regions and social classes. It will reinforce, not diminish, geopolitical inequality and conflict.
As the UNDP emphasized in its report last year, global warming is above all a threat to the poor and the unborn, the "two parties with little or no political voice". Coordinated global action on their behalf thus presupposes either their revolutionary empowerment or the transformation of the self-interest of rich countries and classes into an enlightened "solidarity" without precedent in history. From a rational perspective, the latter outcome only seems realistic if it can be shown that privileged groups possess no preferential "exit" option, that internationalist public opinion drives policymaking in key countries, and that greenhouse gas reduction could be achieved without major sacrifices in upscale Northern Hemispheric standards of living—none of which seems highly likely.
And what if growing environmental and social turbulence, instead of stimulating heroic innovation and international cooperation, simply drives elite publics into even more frenzied attempts to wall themselves off from the rest of humanity? Global intervention, in this unexplored but not improbable scenario, would be silently abandoned(as, to some extent, it already has been)in favor of accelerated investment in selective adaptation for Earth’s first-class passengers. We’re talking here of the prospect of creating green and gated oases of permanent affluence on an otherwise stricken planet.
Of course, there will still be treaties, carbon credits, famine relief, humanitarian acrobatics, and perhaps, the full-scale conversion of some European cities and small countries to alternative energy. But the shift to low-, or zero-emission lifestyles would be almost unimaginably expensive. And this will certainly become even more unimaginable after perhaps 2030, when the combined impacts of climate change, peak oil, peak water, and an additional 1. 5 billion people on the planet may begin to seriously threaten growth.
What is the author’s attitude towards the shift to low-emission lifestyles?
选项
A、Doubtful.
B、Supportive.
C、Ambiguous.
D、Encouraging.
答案
A
解析
态度题。题目问的是“作者对转向‘低排放’的生活方式持什么态度?”。由文章最后一段第二、三句“…the shift to low-,or zero-emission lifestyles would be almost unimaginably expensive.And this will certainly become even more unimaginable after perhaps2030…”可知:这种转变代价很高,而且在2030年后可能会变的更难。由此可以推断作者对转向“低排放”的生活方式持怀疑态度。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CyWd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
ChrisBoningtonhasclimbedMountEverestatleasttwicesofar.
In1993,therateofmuggingreachedthehighestsince1981______.Thereisahigherpercentageofblacksamongmuggersbecause
______youngchildrenareexpectedtolearnrepetitivelybothinclassandathome?______buildingblocksandlargepuzzlesare
Theauthorholdsthatengineeringandhumanitieshavetheleastincommon.Theauthor’ssecondaryschoolambitionwastomajor
Theauthorholdsthatengineeringandhumanitieshavetheleastincommon.Theauthorwantedtocombineengineeringwithhumani
LincolnUniversity,beginningasaschoolofagriculture,istheoldestinstitutioninthecommonwealth.
LincolnUniversity,beginningasaschoolofagriculture,istheoldestinstitutioninthecommonwealth.
YouhavereadasurveyabouttheincomesourcesofstudentsinaninternationalscalerecentlyinthenewspaperChinaDaily.The
Whatdoesthemanthinkofthegovernment’spresentproposalaboutbuildingmorepowerstationsinthecountry?
Whatdoesthemanthinkofthegovernment’spresentproposalaboutbuildingmorepowerstationsinthecountry?
随机试题
下列心脏病中宜采用强心苷类药物治疗的是
细菌进入肝脏引起脓肿的主要途径是()。
《医疗用毒性药品管理办法》规定,生产毒性药品必须严格执行生产工艺操作规程,在本单位药品检验人员的监督下准确投料,并建立完整的生产记录,保存几年备查
2岁小儿,健康查体时在右肋缘下约1.5cm处触及肝脏,质软,表面光滑,边缘锐,无触痛,小儿一般情况好。其肝脏大属于
会计工作岗位,可以一人一岗、一人多岗或者一岗多人。()
下列各项中,属于政府采购执行模式的有()。
古诗中的律偶诗在()方面都要求必须对仗。
“观念的东西不外是移人人的头脑并在人的头脑中改造过的物质的东西而已”。这一命题揭示了()。
一个四边形广场,它的四边长分别是60米、72米、96米、84米,现在四边上都植树,四角需种树,而且每两棵树的间隔相等,那么,至少要种多少棵树?
Mary:Tom,wouldyouliketogotoapartythisSaturday?Tom:______.Whatkindofparty?Mary:It’sabirthdayparty.
最新回复
(
0
)