首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
admin
2019-08-17
94
问题
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example, the wealthy oil enclave of Abu Dhabi brags that it has planted more than 130 million trees—each of which does its duty in absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, this artificial forest in the desert also consumes huge quantities of irrigation water produced, or recycled, from expensive desalination plants. The trees may allow its leaders to wear a halo at international meetings, but the rude fact is that they are an energy-intensive beauty strip, like most of so-called green capitalism. And, while we’re at it, let’s just ask: What if the buying and selling of carbon credits and pollution offsets fails to reduce global warming? What exactly will motivate governments and global industries then to join hands in a crusade to reduce emissions through regulation and taxation?
Kyoto-type climate diplomacy assumes that all the major actors will recognize an overriding common interest in gaining harness over the runaway greenhouse effect. But global warming is not War of the Worlds, where invading Martians are dedicated to annihilating all of humanity without distinction. Climate change, instead, will initially produce dramatically unequal impacts across regions and social classes. It will reinforce, not diminish, geopolitical inequality and conflict.
As the UNDP emphasized in its report last year, global warming is above all a threat to the poor and the unborn, the "two parties with little or no political voice". Coordinated global action on their behalf thus presupposes either their revolutionary empowerment or the transformation of the self-interest of rich countries and classes into an enlightened "solidarity" without precedent in history. From a rational perspective, the latter outcome only seems realistic if it can be shown that privileged groups possess no preferential "exit" option, that internationalist public opinion drives policymaking in key countries, and that greenhouse gas reduction could be achieved without major sacrifices in upscale Northern Hemispheric standards of living—none of which seems highly likely.
And what if growing environmental and social turbulence, instead of stimulating heroic innovation and international cooperation, simply drives elite publics into even more frenzied attempts to wall themselves off from the rest of humanity? Global intervention, in this unexplored but not improbable scenario, would be silently abandoned(as, to some extent, it already has been)in favor of accelerated investment in selective adaptation for Earth’s first-class passengers. We’re talking here of the prospect of creating green and gated oases of permanent affluence on an otherwise stricken planet.
Of course, there will still be treaties, carbon credits, famine relief, humanitarian acrobatics, and perhaps, the full-scale conversion of some European cities and small countries to alternative energy. But the shift to low-, or zero-emission lifestyles would be almost unimaginably expensive. And this will certainly become even more unimaginable after perhaps 2030, when the combined impacts of climate change, peak oil, peak water, and an additional 1. 5 billion people on the planet may begin to seriously threaten growth.
What is the author’s attitude towards the shift to low-emission lifestyles?
选项
A、Doubtful.
B、Supportive.
C、Ambiguous.
D、Encouraging.
答案
A
解析
态度题。题目问的是“作者对转向‘低排放’的生活方式持什么态度?”。由文章最后一段第二、三句“…the shift to low-,or zero-emission lifestyles would be almost unimaginably expensive.And this will certainly become even more unimaginable after perhaps2030…”可知:这种转变代价很高,而且在2030年后可能会变的更难。由此可以推断作者对转向“低排放”的生活方式持怀疑态度。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CyWd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
ChrisBoningtonhasclimbedMountEverestatleasttwicesofar.
ChrisBoningtonhasclimbedMountEverestatleasttwicesofar.
ChrisBoningtonhasclimbedMountEverestatleasttwicesofar.
Themid-19thcenturytimetravelerswouldnotbesurprisedbytoday’sInternetbecause______Howmanysimilarpointshasthewr
HowoldistheearliestsurvivingexamplesofChineseprinting?
WhenwastheorganizationofRedCrossestablished?
LincolnUniversity,beginningasaschoolofagriculture,istheoldestinstitutioninthecommonwealth.
LincolnUniversity,beginningasaschoolofagriculture,istheoldestinstitutioninthecommonwealth.
随机试题
2006年3月20日,上海的甲公司与北京的乙公司签订了一份买卖合同,约定:甲公司向乙公司购买1000吨化工原料,总价款为200万元;乙公司在合同签订后1个月内交货,甲公司在验货后7日内付款。双方没有明确约定履行地点。合同签订后,甲公司以其办公用房作抵押向丙
在Windows7中,如果误删了重要文件则无法恢复,只能重做。()
不属于眼球内容物的结构是
脑内具有生命中枢之称的部位是
有关上颌牙列的纵胎曲线,说法正确的有
患者,男性,77岁。因脑出血入院,患者大小便失禁,需加铺橡胶单,其上端距床头约
依法定方式签发票据并将票据交付给收款人的人是()。
技能是一种活动方式,属于动作经验,与属于认知经验的知识是相同的。()
下列属于无效的民事行为的是()
Muchoftheworldshouldgoonadietin2014.Morethanathirdofadults【C1】______wereestimatedtobe【C2】______orobesein20
最新回复
(
0
)