首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
admin
2019-08-17
61
问题
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example, the wealthy oil enclave of Abu Dhabi brags that it has planted more than 130 million trees—each of which does its duty in absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, this artificial forest in the desert also consumes huge quantities of irrigation water produced, or recycled, from expensive desalination plants. The trees may allow its leaders to wear a halo at international meetings, but the rude fact is that they are an energy-intensive beauty strip, like most of so-called green capitalism. And, while we’re at it, let’s just ask: What if the buying and selling of carbon credits and pollution offsets fails to reduce global warming? What exactly will motivate governments and global industries then to join hands in a crusade to reduce emissions through regulation and taxation?
Kyoto-type climate diplomacy assumes that all the major actors will recognize an overriding common interest in gaining harness over the runaway greenhouse effect. But global warming is not War of the Worlds, where invading Martians are dedicated to annihilating all of humanity without distinction. Climate change, instead, will initially produce dramatically unequal impacts across regions and social classes. It will reinforce, not diminish, geopolitical inequality and conflict.
As the UNDP emphasized in its report last year, global warming is above all a threat to the poor and the unborn, the "two parties with little or no political voice". Coordinated global action on their behalf thus presupposes either their revolutionary empowerment or the transformation of the self-interest of rich countries and classes into an enlightened "solidarity" without precedent in history. From a rational perspective, the latter outcome only seems realistic if it can be shown that privileged groups possess no preferential "exit" option, that internationalist public opinion drives policymaking in key countries, and that greenhouse gas reduction could be achieved without major sacrifices in upscale Northern Hemispheric standards of living—none of which seems highly likely.
And what if growing environmental and social turbulence, instead of stimulating heroic innovation and international cooperation, simply drives elite publics into even more frenzied attempts to wall themselves off from the rest of humanity? Global intervention, in this unexplored but not improbable scenario, would be silently abandoned(as, to some extent, it already has been)in favor of accelerated investment in selective adaptation for Earth’s first-class passengers. We’re talking here of the prospect of creating green and gated oases of permanent affluence on an otherwise stricken planet.
Of course, there will still be treaties, carbon credits, famine relief, humanitarian acrobatics, and perhaps, the full-scale conversion of some European cities and small countries to alternative energy. But the shift to low-, or zero-emission lifestyles would be almost unimaginably expensive. And this will certainly become even more unimaginable after perhaps 2030, when the combined impacts of climate change, peak oil, peak water, and an additional 1. 5 billion people on the planet may begin to seriously threaten growth.
What is the author’s attitude towards the shift to low-emission lifestyles?
选项
A、Doubtful.
B、Supportive.
C、Ambiguous.
D、Encouraging.
答案
A
解析
态度题。题目问的是“作者对转向‘低排放’的生活方式持什么态度?”。由文章最后一段第二、三句“…the shift to low-,or zero-emission lifestyles would be almost unimaginably expensive.And this will certainly become even more unimaginable after perhaps2030…”可知:这种转变代价很高,而且在2030年后可能会变的更难。由此可以推断作者对转向“低排放”的生活方式持怀疑态度。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/CyWd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
ChrisBoningtonhasclimbedMountEverestatleasttwicesofar.
ChrisBoningtonhasclimbedMountEverestatleasttwicesofar.
Themid-19thcenturytimetravelerswouldnotbesurprisedbytoday’sInternetbecause______Howmanysimilarpointshasthewr
HowoldistheearliestsurvivingexamplesofChineseprinting?
______youngchildrenareexpectedtolearnrepetitivelybothinclassandathome?______buildingblocksandlargepuzzlesare
ThecampaignstagedbybothBMWandRenaultaretopromoteThedifferencebetweenBMW’scampaignandRenault’scampaignisthat
Carmakershavelongusedsextoselltheirproducts.Recently,however,bothBMWandRenaulthavebasedtheirlatestEuropeanm
______ismostlikelytoattractworld-famousscholars?______hasestablishedextensiveinternationalconnectionswithotheruni
Navigationcomputers,nowsoldbymostcar-makers,cost$2,000andup.Nosurprise,then,thattheyaremostoftenfoundinluxu
随机试题
某女,40岁。呃逆、嗳气1周余。因与家人吵架生气后,呃声不断,嗳气则舒,胃脘痞塞,时有嘈杂反酸,急躁易怒,多梦,大便不畅;舌红,苔薄黄腻,脉弦。既往史:乙型肝炎5年,十二指肠溃疡2年。医师处方如下:旋覆花9g,吴茱萸5g,黄连5g,枳实9g,紫苏梗
乳糖不耐症患者最适合食用的奶制品是
《医疗用毒性药品管理办法》规定,医疗单位调配毒性药品,每次处方剂量不得超过
女,45岁。阵发性心悸半年,时有胸闷,下肢水肿5天来门诊。心电图示窦性心律,心率64次/分,PR间期0.24秒,伴完全性右束支传导阻滞,诊断为扩张型心肌病,心功能不全。入院后予以洋地黄、利尿剂和扩血管药物治疗。第4天突然神志不清,抽搐,听诊心音消失,血压为
在下列各项中,符合代理特征的是()。
委托人
投资:回报
一个城市的现代化.并非仅仅表现为漂亮的GDP数字、热闹的车水马龙、鳞次栉比的高楼大厦,更在于那些看不到的诸多________。城市的下水道和地铁站的扶梯,都是容易被管理者忽视的地方,虽然平时并不起眼,可往往________着城市管理者的真实水平。填入划横线
旅游者王某参加某旅行社组织的旅游活动,支付了旅游综合服务费人民币200元。由于旅行社提供的服务属欺诈,根据《消费者权益保护法》规定,旅行社应当向旅游者赔偿人民币共()元。
Japanandthenewlyindustrializedcountriesarepassinglabor-intensivesectsasgarment-makingovertolessdevelopednations
最新回复
(
0
)