首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
admin
2011-02-03
115
问题
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below. Since then those users have been frantically trying to re-establish contact. They rely on Envisat’s radars and other sensors for a wide range of measurements, from the temperature of the oceans to the chemistry of the stratosphere. Scientists have used it to gauge ocean conditions for shipping and to investigate earthquakes; its data have been the basis of thousands of scientific papers.
Envisat had, unlike much of Europe, forgone early retirement: designed for five years of operation, it was on its tenth. Given its advanced years, you would think that planning for its eventual end would be well in hand. You would expect that successor instruments would already be in orbit, their measurements carefully cross-correlated with Envisat’s so that the elucidation of the scope and pace of global environmental change could continue seamlessly. You would be wrong.
Wilful blindness
Providing earthlings with a reliable, continuous record of their planet’s condition would seem a sensible aim in any circumstances. With the state of the atmosphere and oceans upset in ways whose consequences are not easily foreseen, and may well prove catastrophic, it becomes an imperative. You do not need to know every little thing about the environment in order to make policy about it. But only long-term measurements will allow researchers to get a reliable grip on the science of climate change and other environmental stresses. A firm grasp of the basic trends is a necessary precondition for understanding and for informed policy.
The governments that build and operate satellites like Envisat are not taking that necessity seriously. According to a damning report from America’s National Academies, the number of civilian Earth-observing satellites flown by the United States government looks likely to fall from 23 today to just 6 in 2020, and the number of instruments in orbit could drop from 90 to 20. The situation in Europe is somewhat less disastrous, but has its own problems. The European Space Agency is unwilling to move forward with a new generation of satellites that can monitor the environment continuously until the European Union promises to pay their operating costs.
Several of the parties involved must share the blame for this failure. The scientists who have a say in setting the priorities for Earth observation often fixate on pet projects and new sorts of measurement, as scientists are not to do; that can lead to the vital business of long-term monitoring getting downplayed. Co-operation and co-ordination between agencies and countries is not what it should be. Then there is bad luck (or poor judgment): in recent years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) lost two Earth-observing missions in a row because of a second-rate rocket for which it has yet to find an adequate replacement.
But the main culprits are governments, which are spending too little on the job. In 2010 the World Meteorological Organisation estimated that getting satellite observations up to scratch in terms of climate monitoring would cost an extra $1 billion a year. In the late 1990s NASA used to spend $2 billion a year on Earth observations, but by 2007 that had fallen to $1.3 billion (the costs of a successor to the Hubble Space Telescope rose from around $2 billion to $9 billion over roughly the same period). Properly co-ordinated, modest increases in the budget in America and the EU, and contributions from other powers (China is now flying very capable Earth-observing satellites; India and Brazil have been in the game for a while), could sort the problem out. Without them, the world will feel its way into the future blind and ill-prepared.
From The Economist, May 12, 2012
Which is not one of the smaller challenges to the project as mentioned in the article?
选项
A、scientist setting other priorities
B、lack of coordination between agencies and countries
C、bad luck
D、a lack of skilled talent in the workforce
答案
D
解析
本题为归纳总结题。第五段“Several of the parties involved must share the blame for this failure.”之后文章分别举出了各项挑战,只有D答案未提及,因此答案为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/D01K777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
You______insuchahurry.Afterall,thestationwaswithinwalkingdistance.
Hismemorycontinuedtoreturn______,aboutfourmonthsaftertheaccident,hecouldevenrememberwhathappenedinthepastye
Heneverhesitatestomake______criticisms______areconsideredhelpfultoothers.
ThisorganizationbroughtWesternartiststogetherinthehopeofmakingmoreofanimpactontheartcommunity______anyofthem
Livinginthenorthwestinvolvesalotofproblems,______sandstormistheworst.
Whatisthetalkmainlyabout’?
WhywastheUnitedStatescalleda"meltingpot"?
Researchershaveestablishedthatwhenpeoplearementallyengaged,biochemicalchangesoccurinthebrainthatallowittoact
Thebankisreportedinthelocalnewspaper______inbroaddaylightyesterday.
随机试题
从2001年起,为特别提款权定值的“一篮子”货币构成包括()
超声造影剂常用哪种物质作为造影剂的基质
下列不属于小儿重症肺炎的表现的是
【背景资料】某安装公司承接了商场(地上5层,地下2层,每层垂直净高5.0m)的自动扶梯安装工程,工程有自动扶梯36台,规格:0.65m/s,梯级宽1000mm,驱动功率10kW。合同签订后,安装公司编制了自动扶梯施工组织与技术方案、作业进度计划等
关于行政处罚,下列表述正确的是()。
在“互联网﹢”时代,通过教育信息化建设,可以突破______障碍,逐步缩小区域、城乡数字差距,扩大优质教育资源覆盖面,把优秀的教育资源送到农村去,送到最需要的地方去,让更多的孩子同在蓝天下共享优质教育。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是:
在进入青春期以后,小莉与父母的关系发生了微妙的变化。这种变化表现在()。
________________、________________、________________可以说是基本词汇的主要特点。
设已知一汉字的国标码是5E48H,则其内码应该是
Readapassageaboutmoderndance.Matchthetopics(61to65)tooneofthestatements(AtoG)givenbelow.Markyouranswer
最新回复
(
0
)