首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2020-03-30
63
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U. S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出,在1986年被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有半涉及铁路公司,但铁路公司经常会胜诉。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/D6TO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Humanbeingsinalltimesandplacesthinkabouttheirworldandwonderattheirplaceinit.Humansarethoughtfulandcreative
Forme,scientificknowledgeisdividedintomathematicalsciences,naturalsciencesorsciencesdealingwiththenaturalworld(
Ateacherissomeonewhocommunicatesinformationorskillsothatsomeoneelsemaylearn.Parentsarethe【C1】______teachers.Ju
Withinthespanofahundredyears,intheseventeenthandearlyeighteenthcenturies,atideofemigration—oneofthegreatfol
Mostpeoplewhotravellongdistancecomplainofjetlag.Jetlagmakesbusinesstravelerslessproductiveandmoreprone【C1】_____
Americansocietyisnotnap(午睡)friendly.Infact,saysDavidDinges,asleepspecialistattheUniversityofPennsylvaniaSchool
Inthatcountry,hospitaldoctorsdon’tgosightseeingveryoftenbecausetheirwork______almostalltheirtime.
WithoutBob’stestimony,evidenceofbriberyislackingand______inthecasewillbeimpossible.
Shoesofthiskindare______tosliponwetground.
Thefirstmentostudythenatureofelectricitycouldnotimaginethattheirexperiments,carriedonbecauseofmereintellectu
随机试题
需求膨胀的具体表现有()。
下列各项中不属于使用中的固定资产的是( )。
不属于施工合同文件组成的是( )。
甲建筑公司是某施工项目的施工总承包单位,乙建筑公司是其分包单位。2008年5月5日,乙建筑公司的施工项目发生了生产安全事故,应由()向负有安全生产监督管理职责的部门报告。
农户联保贷款采取“一次核定、随用随贷、余额控制、周转使用”的管理办法。()
尽管自20世纪70年代西方环境社会学诞生以来,已经形成新生态学范式、政治经济学范式和建构主义范式等三大主流范式.从各自视角出发在一定程度上能够有效解释西方环境问题的社会机制,但对于中国而言则由于社会、政治、文化背景的深刻差异而可能南橘北枳。中国经验的特殊性
一、注意事项1.申论考试是对考生阅读理解能力、综合分析能力、提出和解决问题能力、文字表达能力的测试。2.作答参考时限:阅读材料40分钟,作答110分钟。3.仔细阅读给定的资料,按照后面提出的“申论要求”依次作答。二、给定资料
当今世界,正在从数据时代走向大数据时代。今年两会,“大数据”第一次出现在政府工作报告中,这表明,我们对大数据重要性的认识上升到国家层面。大数据带来最直接的影响不包括()。
ThreeWaystoBecomeMoreCreativeMostpeoplebelievetheydon’thavemuchimagination.Theyarewrong.Everyonehasimagin
【B1】【B11】
最新回复
(
0
)