首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2020-03-30
52
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U. S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出,在1986年被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有半涉及铁路公司,但铁路公司经常会胜诉。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/D6TO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Lately,therestaurantchain,which______mainlytoblue-collardiners,hasbeenhurtbycompetition.
BecauseEdgarwasconvincedoftheaccuracyofthisfact,he______hisopinion.
ManycountrieswillnotallowcigaretteadvertisingintheirnewspapersoronTVespeciallysincetheadvertisementsareusually
Untilmeninventedwaysofstayingunderwaterformorethanafewminutes,thewondersoftheworldbelowthesurfaceofthesea
Mostpeoplewhotravellongdistancecomplainofjetlag.Jetlagmakesbusinesstravelerslessproductiveandmoreprone【C1】_____
ThetwoclawsofthematureAmericanlobsteraredecidedlydifferentfromeachother.Thecrusherclawisshortandstout;thec
Thechiefeditorthoughthetooksomelibertieswiththeoriginalintranslation.Soitwasnecessarythathemakethe______sugg
"ItwasthebeginningofarevolutioninAmericaandtheworld,arevolutionthatsomehaveyettoacknowledgeandmanyhaveyet
Mystudentsfoundthebook______:itprovidedthemwithanabundanceofinformationonthesubject.(2006年财政部财政研究所考博试题)
Computers______5%ofthecountry’scommercialelectricityconsumption.
随机试题
敏感性评价包含速敏性、水敏性、酸敏性、碱敏性和()评价。
福建工夫茶冲泡过程中,斟茶时,用开水“高冲”入水壶后,大约浸泡()min后,把泡好的茶汤巡回注入茶杯中。
以下哪部作品是纪伯伦用阿拉伯文来创作的()
事物多方面属性、特点、关系的整合或再现是指
在目前世界上最高层的区域经济一体化组织是()
新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病下列哪一项不正确
下列关于视锥细胞的叙述,哪项是错误的
甲乙丙丁戊五人共同组建一有限公司。出资协议约定甲以现金10万元出资,甲已缴纳6万元,尚有4万元未缴纳。某次公司股东会上,甲请求免除其4万元的出资义务。股东会五名股东,其中四名表示同意,投反对票的股东丙向法院起诉,请求确认该股东会决议无效。对此,下列哪一表述
一般移动平均线的基础时间越少,移动平均线对股价的反应越灵敏;反之,越迟钝。( )
男,60岁。无痛性血尿半年余。膀胱镜检查,膀胱三角区可见一乳头状肿物,有蒂。活检报告为乳头状瘤。符合此诊断的病变是
最新回复
(
0
)