首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2020-03-30
79
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U. S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出,在1986年被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有半涉及铁路公司,但铁路公司经常会胜诉。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/D6TO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Hiddenhotelcostscanbeasourceoffrustrationtothefrugaltraveler.
Duringrecentyearswehaveheardmuchabout"race":howthisracedoescertainthingsandthatracebelievescertainthingsand
Thegirl______whenshecouldn’tanswerthequestioninthepresenceofallherclassmates.
Onleaving,wethankedhimmostwarmlyforthehospitality______tousandourfriends.
我在这风光奇异的地方待的时间不长,但我的心灵得到了升华。那天晚上,我斗胆来到宾馆外,去观赏这五彩斑斓的极光(northernlights)把夜空照亮。传说如果你对着极光吹口哨,它们就会落到你的脚下。于是我吹响了口哨,发现它们仍待在原先的地方,在寒冷贫瘠的
Withouttelephoneitwouldbeimpossibletocarryonthefunctionsof______everybusinessoperationinthewholecountry.
Thegovernmentdecidedtolakea______actiontoslrengrhenthemarketmanagement(2007年清华大学考博试题)
Shefeltoffendedatmyremarks,butitwasn’tmy______tohurther.(2002年武汉大学考博试题)
Thereisnoelectricityagain.Hasthe______blownthen?
Oncethepriceofthelandhasbeen______,wecangoaheadtobuildthehouse.
随机试题
功能润肺止咳的药物有
下列喉肌中,不能缩小声门裂的是()
下列哪类血管可见透明血栓
A.血瘀B.风寒C.肾虚D.血虚E.气虚产后遍身关节酸楚,肢体麻木,头晕心悸。其证候是()
为了防止电焊机火灾、爆炸,下更要求正确的有()。
锅炉运行中,热损失包括()。
在儿童早期的学习中,以下哪种内驱力的作用最为突出?()
给定资料1.行政审批制度作为政府对经济、社会生活调控的重要手段,被西方发达闰家普遍采用,并都经历了一个改革的过程,、第一次世界大战前,行政审批事项数量较少。但在第二次世界大战期间,为了适应战时的需要,各国通过严格的管制,强化了对社会的控制,审批行
A.longwayB.anymoreC.livingbeyondPhrases:A.thatalotofusthink【T7】______eighty-threewouldbeabonusB.Seve
A、女的有孩子了B、女的很有福气C、女的变胖了D、女的肉吃得多C对话中“你可真发福了啊”中的“发福”是变胖了的意思,选C。
最新回复
(
0
)