首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2020-03-30
56
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U. S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出,在1986年被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有半涉及铁路公司,但铁路公司经常会胜诉。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/D6TO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
SomeAfricanAmericanshavehadaprofoundimpactonAmericansociety,changingmanypeople’sviewsonrace,historyandpolitic
Whatarethoseofuswhohavechosencareersinscienceandengineeringabletodoaboutourcurrentproblems?First,wecan
Whatarethoseofuswhohavechosencareersinscienceandengineeringabletodoaboutourcurrentproblems?First,wecan
Ateacherissomeonewhocommunicatesinformationorskillsothatsomeoneelsemaylearn.Parentsarethe【C1】______teachers.Ju
Inordertosurvivenowand______inthefuture,alltheworkingstaffmustconstantlycreatenewideasforeveryaspectofyour
Anewstudysuggeststhatcontrarytomostsurveys,peopleareactuallymorestressedathomethanatwork.Researchersmeasured
Itissaidthatsciencehasbecometoocomplextoacknowledgetheexistenceofuniversaltruths.
Hismagnificenthouseisthe______ofallhisfriends.
SinceJapan______importancetoeducationandtechnologicalinnovation,itseconomyhasdevelopedatahighspeed.(2002年上海交通大学考博试
(北京航空航天大学2013年试题)Mostworthwhilecareersrequiresomekindofspecializedtraining.Ideally,therefore,thechoiceofan【C1】
随机试题
我国封闭式基金份额的发售价格一般采用1元基金份额面值加计0.01元发售费用的方式加以确定。( )
下列各项中,属于表证的临床表现的是
A.泻白散合黛蛤散B.龙胆泻肝汤C.柴胡疏肝散D.丹栀逍遥散E.滋水清肝饮吐血色红或紫黯,口苦,胁痛,心烦易怒,寐少多梦,舌质红绛,脉弦数。治疗应首选
设计时速为160km/h的路基沉降观测应采用()等几何水准测量。
某企业拟拆除该单位的污水处理设施,下列叙述中,不符合环境保护法要求的是()。
适用特殊性税务处理规定的企业重组,重组交易对价中股权支付金额不得低于交易支付总额的()。
个体不能回忆刚看过东西的位置,也不能回忆刚学过的词的顺序,其中枢神经系统受损的部位是:
1842年8月29日,清政府与英国签订的中国近代史上第一个不平等条约是
美国国防部安全标准定义了四个安全级别,其中最高安全级提供了最全面的安全支持,它是()。
应用题必须用蓝、黑色钢笔或者圆珠笔写在答题纸的相应位置上,否则无效。请根据下图所示网络结构回答下列问题。(1)设备1应选用哪种网络设备?(2)若对整个网络实施保护,防火墙应加在图中位置1~位置3的哪个位置上?(3)如果采用了入侵检测设备对进出网络的
最新回复
(
0
)