首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It was a day that Michael Eisner would undoubtedly like to forget. Sitting in a Los Angeles witness box for four hours last week
It was a day that Michael Eisner would undoubtedly like to forget. Sitting in a Los Angeles witness box for four hours last week
admin
2012-05-18
32
问题
It was a day that Michael Eisner would undoubtedly like to forget. Sitting in a Los Angeles witness box for four hours last week, the usually unflappable chairman of the Walt Disney Co. struggled to maintain his composure. Eisner’s prote ge turned nemesis. Jeffrey Katzenberg, his former employee, was seeking $500 million in his breach-of-contract suit against Disney, and Eisner was trying to defend his—and his company’s integrity. At one point Eisner became flustered when Katzenberg’s attorney, Bertram Fields, asked if he recalled telling his biographer, Tony Schwartz, "I think I hate the little midget." Later Eisner recalled that the same day, he had received a fax from Katzenberg meant for Fields, thanking the lawyer for "managing" a magazine story that praised Katzenberg at Eisner’s expense: "I said to Schwartz, ’Screw that. If he is going to play this disingenuous game... I simply was not going to pay him his money.’"
Last week’s revelations were the latest twist in a dispute that has entertained Hollywood and tarnished Disney’s corporate image. The dash began five years ago, when Katzenberg quit Disney after a 10-year reign as studio chief, during which he oversaw production of such animated blockbusters as "The Lion King". Disney’s attorneys said that Katzenberg forfeited his bonus — 2 percent of profits in perpetuity from all Disney movies, TV shows and stage productions from 1984 to 1994, as well as their sequels and tie-ins — when he left. The company ultimately paid Katzenberg a partial settlement of nearly $ 17 million, sources say. But talks broke down over how much Disney owed, and the dispute landed in court.
Industry insiders never expected that Disney would push it this far. The last Hollywood accounting dispute that aired in public was Art Buchwalds — lawsuit against Paramount for profits he claimed to be owed from the 1988 Eddie Murphy hit "Coming to America" Paramount chose to fight Buchwald in court—only to wind up paying him $1 million after embarrassing revelations about its business practices. After that, studios made a practice of quietly settling such claims. But Disney under Eisner would rather fight that settle. And he and Katzenberg are both proud, combative types whose business disagreement deepened into personal animus.
So far, Disney’s image — as well as Eisner’s — has taken a beating. In his testimony last week Eisner repeatedly responded to questions by saying "I don’t recall" or "I don’t know" Katzenberg, by contrast, offered a stack of notes and memos that appeared to bolster his claim. (The Disney executive who negotiated Katzenberg’s deal, Frank Wells, died in a helicopter crash five years ago.)
The trial has also offered a devastating glimpse into the Magic Kingdom’s business dealings. Internal documents detail sensitive Disney financial information. One Hollywood lawyer calls a memo sent to Katzenberg from a former Disney top accountant "a road map to riches" for writers, directors and producers eager to press cases against Disney. The company declined requests to comment on the case. The next phase of the trial could be even more embarrassing. As Katzenberg’s profit participation is calculated, Eisner will have to argue that his animated treasures are far less valuable than Katzenberg claims. No matter how the judge rules, Disney will look like a loser.
Hollywood studios now try to avoid sealing disputes with their employees in court because they fear that______.
选项
A、involvement in a lawsuit will tarnish their reputation
B、many of their illegal business practices will be found out by the public
C、lawyers will overcharge them for such cases
D、their confidential business information will be divulged
答案
D
解析
细节判断题。根据文章第三段,Hollywood的电影公司都尽量避免与他们的雇员打官司,因为一旦上了法庭,他们可能不得不公开自己的财务细目,泄露自己的商业秘密,从而给自己造成损失。由此可知D为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/DNiO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AuthorEmmaHeathcote-Jameshasspentnineyearslookingintoreal-lifeghoststories,collectingtalesfromhundredsofpeople
Nowadays,theinternetisextremelypopular.Ithasalotofeffectonpeople’slife,includingthepositiveandthenegativeas
InInternetaddiction,peoplenotonlybehavedifferentlythanthat【M1】______societywouldconsider"normal",theyalsothinkd
Stratford-on-Avon,asweallknow,hasonlyoneindustry—WilliamShakespeare—buttherearetwodistinctlyseparateandincre
Whichofthefollowingisacompoundword?
WhichofthefollowingworktellshowSatanrebelledagainstGodandhowAdamandEveweredrivenoutofEden?
Youknowher—thatniceteenageracrossthestreet?Chloe.Theresheis,sittinginoneofthetwocaptain’sseatsinthemidsect
Syntaxmainlydealswith______.
DangersofUsingComputerTerminalsUndoubtedly,thecomputerhasgreatlyincreasedhumanbeing’sworkingcapacityandintelle
Inanintactplantcommunity,undisturbedbyhumanintervention,thecompositionofacommunityismainlyafunctionoftheclim
随机试题
在默认的情况下,大多数信号会导致接收进程_______。
慢性肾衰竭维持性透析治疗的指征是
A、祛风湿,通经络,消痰水,治骨鲠B、祛风湿,舒筋络,清虚热,利湿退黄C、祛风湿,通经络,清热解毒,降血压D、祛风湿,通经络,强筋骨,安胎E、祛风除湿,活血通络,消肿止痛,杀虫解毒秦艽的功效为()
A、地西泮的3-羟基活性代谢物B、奥沙西泮C、丙戊酸钠D、羟布宗E、可待因地西泮的N-去甲基-3-羟基活性代谢物是()。
根据《药品召回管理办法》,药品召回的主体是
某施工企业通过投标获得了某机电安装工程的施工总承包任务,该施工企业中标后的第10天与业主签订了固定总价机电安装施工总承包合同。随后,该施工企业将部分主体工程分包给具有相应资质条件的分包人,并签订了分包合同。施工总承包合同中约定的合同工期为380d,而依施工
关于保险公司的财务状况评价,下列说法不正确的是( )。
假设利率为3%,你想保证自己通过一年的投资得到5万美元,那么你在当前的投资应该为()万美元
一、注意事项1.申论考试,与传统作文考试不同,是对分析驾驭材料的能力、解决问题能力、语言表达能力的测试。2.作答参考时限:阅读材料40分钟,作答110分钟。3.仔细阅读给定的资料,按照后面提出的“申论要求”依次作答。二、给定材料
Businessmemoisfrequentlyusedincompanies.Itiscalledanintra-companycommunicationbecauseitisusedbypeopleintheir
最新回复
(
0
)