首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
admin
2013-09-24
44
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image: libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read more, or at least buy more— several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will—well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way—a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books—have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. I can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless. I was brought up by people who had been taught and who taught me- that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them. I should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient— yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
The author was told the idea that books are______.
选项
A、more cherished by previous people
B、mostly stored in public libraries for free reading
C、luxuries for people when he was young
D、valuable for people to collect and treasure
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/DUc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
AnintegralpartofthestoryofAmerica,thecowboyisanationalsymbol.America’sfirstcowboyscamefromMexico.Beginni
AnimalsontheMoveItlookedlikeascenefrom"Jaws"butwithoutthedramaticmusic.Ahugesharkwaslowlyswimmingthrou
Itisnotsurprisingthataphilosophyborrowedfrombusinessshouldseeitsprincipalfocuswithineducationasthefurthering
Wefindthatbrightchildrenarerarelyheldbackbymixedabilityteaching.Onthecontrary,boththeirknowledgeand【B1】______
Thefirstmoving-picturetheaterwasprobablytheworkofHarryDavis,Pittsburgh’smostprosperousshowman.In1904,herented
Thefirstmoving-picturetheaterwasprobablytheworkofHarryDavis,Pittsburgh’smostprosperousshowman.In1904,herented
I’llworkwithredoubledefforts;_______________(我绝不会辜负你们对我的期望的)
TheFlyingPhoneBoxAsurpriseforairtravelersThestridesmadeinsatellite-communicationstechnologyinrecentyear
A、Sheagreeswiththeman.B、MostpeopleholdthesameopinionwithJack.C、Thisyear’sfootballseasonwillbelessexciting.D
Assoonasitwasrevealedthatareporterforprogressivemagazinehaddiscoveredhowtomakeahydrogenbomb,agroupoffirea
随机试题
法的规范作用是指法作为一种规范体系对人们行为的调整作用,主要包括评价作用、教育作用、预测作用、强制作用等。通过法的实施而对一般人或准备采取同类行为的人所发生的积极影响,主要体现了法的【】
下列除哪项外,均是妊娠腹痛的称谓( )。
男,40岁。晚餐后5小时开始上腹疼痛,向左肩、腰、背部放射及恶心、呕吐、腹胀。现已37个小时。曾有胆结石史。体检:R24次/分,T38.9℃,BP90/75mmHg。巩膜可疑黄染,全腹压痛,以上腹部显著伴肌紧张和反跳痛,移动性浊音阳性,血白细胞16×1
患者男,38岁。1小时前口服安眠药2瓶,由家人急诊入院,呼之无应答。意识昏迷,护士迅速给予洗胃。护士应于何时做上题中的动作()。
某高层住宅大楼,房地总价值为8000万元,其中建筑物价值占40%。某人拥有其中的一套住宅,房地价值为130万元,该部分的建筑物价值为50万元,则此人占有的土地份额为()。
微分方程y"—4y=6的通解是:(C1,C2为任意常数)
目前市场交易占全部存托凭证交易的85%左右。( )
导游证持有者如在有效期满后仍继续从事导游活动的,应在有效期届满()前,向省、自治区、直辖市人民政府旅游行政部门申请办理换发导游证手续。
SDS的正向评分题若评为3分,则其症状出现频度是()有症状。(2004年6月三级真题)
Thisbookisa______ofradioscripts,inwhichweseektoexplainhowthewordsandexpressionsbecomepartofourlanguage.
最新回复
(
0
)