首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
admin
2013-09-24
60
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image: libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read more, or at least buy more— several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will—well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way—a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books—have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. I can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless. I was brought up by people who had been taught and who taught me- that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them. I should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient— yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
The author was told the idea that books are______.
选项
A、more cherished by previous people
B、mostly stored in public libraries for free reading
C、luxuries for people when he was young
D、valuable for people to collect and treasure
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/DUc7777K
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
TheUnitedStatesisatypicalcountry______.TheinfluenceofbusinessintheU.S.isevidencedbythefactthat______.
Universitiesarenolonger【B1】______emptyinsummer.Asthestudentsmoveout,holiday-makersmovein,eventothemostunlikel
A、Shealreadytoldthemanaboutherplans.B、Sherecentlyvisitedadifferentuniversity.C、Sheisn’tplanningtotransfertoa
Untiljustafewyearsago,makingababyboyorababygirlwasprettymuchahit-or-miss(偶然的,碰运气的)affair.Notanymore.Paren
Theunauthorized(未经授权的)copyingofcomputerprogramsbyAmericanbusinessesalonedeprivedsoftwarepublishersof$1.6billion
Theunauthorized(未经授权的)copyingofcomputerprogramsbyAmericanbusinessesalonedeprivedsoftwarepublishersof$1.6billion
Therecentoutbreakofbirdfluresultsin______.Ithasbeendiscoveredthat______.
TheFlyingPhoneBoxAsurpriseforairtravelersThestridesmadeinsatellite-communicationstechnologyinrecentyear
A、Sheagreeswiththeman.B、MostpeopleholdthesameopinionwithJack.C、Thisyear’sfootballseasonwillbelessexciting.D
WhowontheWorldCup1994footballgame?WhathappenedattheUnitedNations?Howdidthecritics【C1】______thenewplay?Just
随机试题
简述生产力和生产关系的含义及内容。
下列检查对诊断呼吸衰竭具有重要意义的是
病人,男性,28岁,查体时发现心尖部舒张期隆隆样杂音,心界不大。该病人最常见的并发症且为致死的主要原因是
下列有关公司合并或分立的表述,不正确的是:()
因特殊风险而终止合同时,根据FIDIC合同条件的约定,下列各项中,( )为结算时业主应向承包商支付的费用。
记账凭证按照填制方法的不同,可分为()。
(2009年考试真题)根据支付结算法律制度的规定,下列关于票据填写要求的表述中,不正确的是()。
生产、销售伪劣产品行为成立犯罪,必须是销售金额达到()。
下列关于意识形态的说法,哪个是不正确的()
设f(x)=πx+x2,一π≤x≤π,且f(x)在[一π,π]上的傅里叶级数为(ancosnx+bnsinnx),bn=___________。
最新回复
(
0
)