首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday— a modest policy victory for the
On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday— a modest policy victory for the
admin
2018-05-06
22
问题
On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday— a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration. But on the more important matter of the Constitution, the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’ s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.
In Arizona vs. United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law. The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization " and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial. Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.
Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’ s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun. On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress (国会) had deliberately "occupied the field" and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’ s privileged powers.
However, the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement. That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.
Two of the three objecting Justice—Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas—agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Anton Scalia, who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the Alien and Sedition Acts.
The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as " a shocking assertion of federal executive power". The White House argued that Arizona’ s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with.
Some powers do belong exclusively (专门地)to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could. It never did so. The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
Three provisions of Arizona’ s plan were overturned because they______.
选项
A、overstepped the authority of federal immigration law
B、disturbed the power balance between different states
C、deprived the federal police of Constitutional powers
D、contradicted both the federal and state policies
答案
A
解析
细节题。题目问的是亚利桑那州法案为何被推翻。定位到第二段第二句“federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial”,由此可是州法案超越了联邦法案,因而被推翻,故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/DcT3777K
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
Despitegrowingnumbersofjoggers,CanadaFitnessSurveysacrossthecountrydemonstratethatCanadiansarelessphysicallyfit
Despitegrowingnumbersofjoggers,CanadaFitnessSurveysacrossthecountrydemonstratethatCanadiansarelessphysicallyfit
Despitegrowingnumbersofjoggers,CanadaFitnessSurveysacrossthecountrydemonstratethatCanadiansarelessphysicallyfit
Despitegrowingnumbersofjoggers,CanadaFitnessSurveysacrossthecountrydemonstratethatCanadiansarelessphysicallyfit
Despitegrowingnumbersofjoggers,CanadaFitnessSurveysacrossthecountrydemonstratethatCanadiansarelessphysicallyfit
Despitegrowingnumbersofjoggers,CanadaFitnessSurveysacrossthecountrydemonstratethatCanadiansarelessphysicallyfit
Thecompanyhas______itselftoapolicyofequalopportunityforall.
A、Heisalawyer.B、Heisadoctor.C、Heisatravelagent.D、Heisanimmigrationofficer.B根据对话中“pain”可知,这是一个医患诊疗的过程,故该男士的职业是医
A、Shedidn’tbelievetheman’sstory.B、Shewasdeeplymovedbytheman’saccident.C、Themanwasnearlyknockeddown.D、Theacc
随机试题
曲轴箱通风不良将会造成哪些危害?
属于重度睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的诊断指标是
在队列研究中对结果进行假设检验,正确的无效假设是
妊娠期母体变化哪项不对()
治理管涌与流沙(土)的原则是以防为主,大范围的流沙(土)险情出现时,首先应采取的有效措施是()。
2010年3月31日,松南公司有关账户期末余额及相关经济业务如下:(1)“库存现金”账户借方余额2000元,“银行存款”账户借方余额350000元,“其他货币资金”账户借方余额500000元。(2)“应收账款”总账账户借方余额350000元,其
甲于某日清晨使用月票在市公园内露天舞池旁学习跳舞,突然被旁边一棵树上坠落的枯枝砸在后头颈上,随即被他人送到医院诊治。诊断结论为颈椎髓震荡,颈椎过伸性损伤,甲为此花费医药费若干。因损害赔偿与公园发生纠纷,甲诉至法院。对此,下列说法正确的是()。
进行总体参数的点估计时,选择较好的点估计值所依据的标准包括()
如果要在菜单中渤口一个分隔线,则应将其Caption属性设置为______。
Youshould________whatyouoriginallystatedifyouwantyourchildren’srespect.
最新回复
(
0
)