首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For the past six years, crime rates have been falling all over America. In some big cities, the fall has been extraordinary. Bet
For the past six years, crime rates have been falling all over America. In some big cities, the fall has been extraordinary. Bet
admin
2012-01-21
49
问题
For the past six years, crime rates have been falling all over America. In some big cities, the fall has been extraordinary. Between 1993 and 1997 in New York city violent crime fell by 39% in central Harlem and by 45% in the once-terrifying South Bronx. The latest figures released by the FBI, for 1997, show that serious crime continued to fall in all the larger cities, though a little more slowly than in 1996.
Violent crime fell by 5% in all and by slightly more in cities with over 250,000 people. Property crimes have fallen, too, by more than 20% since 1980, so that the rates for burglary and car-theft are lower in America than they are in supposedly more law-abiding Britain and Scandinavia. And people have noticed. In 1994, 31% of Americans told pollsters that crime was the most important challenge facing the country, while in 1997, only 14% thought so. Some cities’ police departments are so impressed by these figures, it is said, that they have lately taken to exaggerating the plunge in crime.
Why this has happened is anyone’s guess. Many factors — social, demographic, economic, and political — affect crime rate, so it is difficult to put a finger on the vital clue. In March this year, the FBI itself admitted it had "no idea" why rates were falling so fast.
Politicians think they know, of course. Ask Rudy Giuliani, the mayor of New York, why his city has made such strides in beating crime that it accounts for fully a quarter of the national decline. He will cite his policy of "zero tolerance". This concept, which sprang from a famous article by two criminologists in Atlantic Monthly in March 1982, maintains that by refusing to tolerate tiny infractions of the law — dropping litter, spray — painting walls — the authorities can create a climate in which crime of more dangerous kinds finds it impossible to flourish. The Atlantic article was called "Broken Windows"; if one window in a building was left broken, it argued, all the others would soon be gone. The answer: mend the window, fast.
The metro system in Washington, D.C was the first place where zero tolerance drew public attention, especially when one passenger was arrested for eating a banana. The policy seemed absurdly pernickety, yet it worked: in a better environment, people’s behavior improved, and crime dropped. Mr. Giuliani, taking this theme to heart, has gone further. He has cracked down on windscreen-cleaners, public urinates, graffiti, and even jaywalkers. He has excoriated New York’s famously sullen cabdrivers, and wants all New Yorkers to be nicer to each other. Tony Blair, visiting from London, has been hugely impressed.
But is this cleanliness and civility the main reason why crime has fallen? It seems unlikely "Zero tolerance" can also be a distraction, making too many policemen spend too much time handing out littering tickets and parking fines while, some streets away, young men are being murdered for their trainers. It is localized, too: though lower Manhattan or the Washington metro can show the uncanny orderliness of a communist regime, other parts of the city — the areas of highest crime maybe left largely untreated.
William Bratton, New York’s police commissioner until Mr. Giuliani fired him for stealing his thunder, has a different explanation for the fall in crime. It came about mostly, he believes, because he reorganized the police department and restored its morale: giving his officers better guns, letting them take more decisions for themselves, and moving them away from desk jobs and out into the struts. Mr. Bratton made his precinct commanders personally responsible for reducing crimes on their own beats. There was no passing the buck, and those who failed were fired. Within a year, he had replaced half of them.
In Washington D.C.a passenger was arrested for eating a banana in the metro system. This case later shows that ______.
选项
A、the police are fastidious
B、in a better environment, people’s bahaviour improves
C、zero to tolerance is a failure
D、Mr. Giuliani disagreed with it
答案
B
解析
第五段落中提到了在华盛顿地区地铁里实施zero tolerance。当警察将在地铁 里吃香蕉的乘客逮捕时,会引起公众的注意,警察可能吹毛求疵,但这确实有效:在好的 环境里,人们的行为会有改善。文章中引用具体例子正是来证明这一观点的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/DhXd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
WhyWouldTheyFalselyConfess?Whyonearthwouldaninnocentpersonfalselyconfesstocommittingacrime?Tomostpeople,
EvenIntelligentPeopleCanFail1Thestrikingthingabouttheinnovatorswhosucceededinmakingourmodernworldishow
EvenIntelligentPeopleCanFail1Thestrikingthingabouttheinnovatorswhosucceededinmakingourmodernworldishow
ItcanbeinferredfromthefirstparagraphthateachbigcityinEuropeWhichstatementisNOTtrueofCoventGarden?
WhyistheNativeLanguageLearntSoWell?Howdoesithappenthatchildrenlearntheirmothertonguesowell?Whenwecompa
RonaldKahnandhiscolleaguescanmakemicelivelongerbyAccordingtothepassage,wedonotknowwhetherhumanswillbenefi
WhySoManyChildren?InmanyofthedevelopingcountriesinAfricaandAsia,thepopulationisgrowingfast.Thereasonfor
WhatarethecharacteristicsofStandardEnglish?WhichofthefollowingfactorsdidnotcontributetotheLondondialectbecom
WherewouldhestayafterhisscholarshipyearinLondonwasover?
PerusingtheTimesin1844,FriedrichEngelswashorrifiedtonotethat,inasingleday,Londonsufferedatheft,anattackon
随机试题
A.由纤维组织及内皮细胞修复B.由周围的腺上皮细胞修复C.由肉芽组织及周围腺上皮细胞修复D.南周围的鳞状上皮细胞修复皮肤糜烂的愈合
1h计数法所需尿标本为
对抗驱虫法是()
私募基金管理人应当对私募基金推介材料内容的()负责。
冀菜的四大流派有()。
联想是因一事物而想起与之有关事物的思想活动。它分为()。
设0≤an<(n=1,2,…)则下列级数中肯定收敛的是________。
设a≠0,b>0N两个常数,则为()
在一个数据库中已经设置了自动宏AutoExec,如果在打开数据库的时候不想执行这个自动宏,正确的操作是______。
在考生文件夹下存在一个数据库文件“samp3.accdb”,里面已经设计好表对象“tStud”,同时还设计出窗体对象“fStud”。请在此基础上按照以下要求补充“fStud”窗体的设计:(1)在窗体的“窗体页眉”中距左边0.4厘米、距上边1.2厘米处添加
最新回复
(
0
)