2. 考研
  3. Drones, originally developed for military purposes, weren’t approved for commercial use in the United States until 2013. When th

Drones, originally developed for military purposes, weren’t approved for commercial use in the United States until 2013. When th

admin2019-06-06  54
问题    Drones, originally developed for military purposes, weren’t approved for commercial use in the United States until 2013. When that happened, it was immediately clear that they could be hugely useful to a whole host of industries—and almost as quickly, it became clear that regulation would be a problem. The new technology raised multiple safety and security issues, there was no consensus on who should write rules to mitigate those concerns, and the knowledge needed to develop the rules didn’t yet exist in many cases. In addition, the little flying robots made a lot of people nervous.
   Such regulatory, logistical, and social barriers to adopting novel products and services are very common. In fact, technology routinely surpasses society’s ability to deal with it. That’s partly because tech entrepreneurs are often insouciant about the legal and social issues their innovations birth. Although electric cars are subsidized by the federal government, Tesla has run afoul of state and local regulations because it bypasses conventional dealers to sell directly to consumers. Facebook is only now facing up to major regulatory concerns about its use of data, despite being massively successful with users and advertisers.
   It’s clear that even as innovations bring unprecedented comfort and convenience, they also threaten old ways of regulating industries, running a business, and making a living. This has always been true. Thus early cars weren’t allowed to go faster than horses, and some 19th-century textile workers used sledgehammers to attack the industrial machinery they feared would displace them. New technology can even upend social norms: Consider how dating apps have transformed the way people meet.
   Interestingly, the same institutional disorder that pervades nascent industries such as drones and driverless cars is something I’ve also seen in developing countries. And strange though this may sound, I believe that tech entrepreneurs can learn a lot from business people who have succeeded in the world’s emerging markets.
   Entrepreneurs in Brazil or Nigeria know that it’s pointless to wait for the government to provide the institutional and market infrastructure their businesses need, because that will simply take too long. They themselves must build support structures to compensate for what Krishna Palepu and I have referred to in earlier writings as "institutional voids." They must create the conditions that will allow them to create successful products or services.
According to Paragraph 4, the institutional disorder______.
选项 A、is widely existing in industries
B、is strange and interesting
C、can be dealt with successfully
D、may be common but have some merits
答案D
解析 推理判断题。根据定位词定位到文章第四段。原文指出，有趣的是，像在无人机和无人驾驶汽车这样的新兴行业中普遍存在着制度混乱现象，我在发展中国家也见过。虽然听起来很奇怪，但我相信，科技企业家可以从那些在世界新兴市场取得成功的商人身上学到很多东西，D项所述符合原文，故D项为正确选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/DjnZ777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)