首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Back in Seattle, around the comer from the Discovery Institute, Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there trul
Back in Seattle, around the comer from the Discovery Institute, Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there trul
admin
2013-01-15
70
问题
Back in Seattle, around the comer from the Discovery Institute, Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there truly is a controversy that must be taught. "The Darwinists are bluffing," he says over a plate of oysters at a downtown seafood restaurant. "They have the science of the steam engine era, and it’s not keeping up with the biology of the information age."
Meyer hands me a recent issue of Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews with an article by Carl Woese, an eminent microbiologist at the University of Illinois. In it, Woese decries the failure of reductionist biology—the tendency to look at systems as merely the stun of their parts—to keep up with the developments of molecular biology. Meyer says the conclusion of Woese’s argument is that the Darwinian emperor has no clothes.
It’s a page out of the antievolution playbook: using evolutionary biology’s own literature against it, selectively quoting from the likes of Stephen Jay Gould to illustrate natural selection’s downfalls. The institute marshals journal articles discussing evolution to provide policymakers with evidence of the raging controversy surrounding the issue.
Woese scoffs at Meyer’s claim when I call to ask him about the paper. "To say that my criticism of Darwinists says that evolutionists have no clothes," Woese says, "is like saying that Einstein is criticizing Newton, therefore Newtonian physics is wrong." Debates about evolution’s mechanisms, he continues, don’t amount to challenges to the theory. And intelligent design "is not science. It makes no predictions and doesn’t offer any explanation whatsoever, except for God did it."
Of course Meyer happily acknowledges that Woese is an ardent evolutionist. The institute doesn’t need to impress Woese or his peers; it can simply co-ocpt the vocabulary of science— "academic freedom," "scientific objectivity," "teach the controversy"—and redirect it to a public trying to reconcile what appear to be two contradictory scientific views. By appealing to a sense of fairness, ID finds a place at the political table, and by merely entering the debate it can claim victory. "We don’t need to win every argument to be a success," Meyer says. "We’re trying to validate a discussion that’s been long suppressed."
This is precisely what happened in Ohio. "I’m not a PhD in biology," says board member Michael Cochran. "But when I have X number of PhD experts telling me this, and X number telling me the opposite, the answer is probably somewhere between the two."
An exasperated Krauss claims that a truly representative debate would have had 10,000 pro-evolution scientists against two Discovery executives. "What these people want is for there to be a debate," says Krauss. "People in the audience say, Hey, these people sound reasonable. They argue, ’People have different opinions, we should present those opinions in school.’ That is nonsense. Some people have opinions that the Holocaust never happened, but we don’t teach that in history."
Eventually, the Ohio board approved a standard mandation that students learn to "describe how scientists continue to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory." Proclaiming victory, Johnson barnstormed Ohio churches soon after notifying congregations of a new, ID-friendly standard. In response, anxious board members added a clause stating that the standard "does not mandate the teaching or testing of intelligent design." Both sides claimed victory. A press release from IDNet trumpeted the mere inclusion of the phrase intelligent design, saying that "the implication of the statement is that the ’teaching of testing of intelligent design’ is permitted." Some pro-evolution scientists, meanwhile, say there’s nothing wrong with teaching students how to scrutinize theory. "I don’t have a problem with that," says Patricia Princehouse, a professor at Case Western Reserve and an outspoken oppnent of ID. "Critical analysis is exactly what scientists do."
What does Woese mean when he answers back for his remark "... evolutionists have no clothes?"
选项
A、His criticism of Darwinists should not be understood as the denial of it
B、Clothes themselves are not what evolutionists are interested in
C、Einstein is right when he is criticizing Newtonian physics
D、Einsteinian physics is an improvement on Newtonian physics
答案
A
解析
从文中第4段“Debates about evolution’s mechanisms, he continues, don’t amount to challenges to the theory”可以看出Woese批评Darwinists,但并不是在否认它。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Dn2O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
【66】Astateuniversitypresidentwasarrestedtodayandchargedwithimpersonateapoliceofficerbecame,theauthoritiessay,h
Iamtoinformyou,thatyoumay,ifyouwish,attendtheinquiry,andattheinspectorsdiscretionstateyourcase______orth
【66】Astateuniversitypresidentwasarrestedtodayandchargedwithimpersonateapoliceofficerbecame,theauthoritiessay,h
Engineeringstudentsaresupposedtobeexamplesofpracticalityandrationality,butwhenitcomestomycollegeeducationIam
Onebusyday,Iwasracingaroundtryingtogettoomuchdone,andIexclaimedtomythreekidsinthecar,"Wecangetboththi
InthefirstyearorsoofWebbusiness,mostoftheactionhasrevolvedaroundeffortstotaptheconsumermarket.Morerecentl
InthefirstyearorsoofWebbusiness,mostoftheactionhasrevolvedaroundeffortstotaptheconsumermarket.Morerecentl
Thebusinessofadvertisingistoinventmethodsofaddressingmassiveaudiencesinalanguagedesignedtobeeasilyaccessible
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【1】tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncommon
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【1】tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncommon
随机试题
患者,女,60岁,因心前区疼痛入院治疗,行冠脉造影后,右下肢出现疼痛、水肿诊断该病最有力的证据是
女性,22岁。颈前肿物3个月。查体:右叶甲状腺触及一质硬结节,直径2cm,同侧颈淋巴结可及2个,质中,活动。B型超声:甲状腺右叶一低回声实性团块。为明确肿物良、恶性,下列各项检查,首先应选择
A、油细胞B、油室C、黏液细胞D、乳汁管E、树脂道党参横切面可见
中国甲公司与美国乙公司的商事纠纷在美国境内通过仲裁解决。因甲公司未履行裁决,乙公司向某人民法院申请承认与执行该裁决。中美均为《纽约公约》缔约国,关于该裁决在中国的承认与执行,下列哪些选项是不正确的?()
关于股票或股票组合的贝他系数,下列说法中错误的是()。
关于肥西三河古镇,以下表述正确的有()。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性。
综述第一次世界大战后至第二次世界大战前亚洲民族解放运动。
在古代的部落社会中,每个人都属于某个家族,每个家族的每个人只崇拜以下五个图腾之一,这五个图腾是:熊、狼、鹿、鸟、鱼。这个社会中的婚姻关系遵守以下法则:(1)崇拜同一图腾的男女可以成婚。(2)崇拜狼的男子可以娶崇拜鹿和崇拜鸟的女子。
A、Searchingforreferencematerial.B、Watchingafilmofthe1930’s.C、Writingacoursebook.D、Lookingforajobinamoviestu
最新回复
(
0
)