首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Back in Seattle, around the comer from the Discovery Institute, Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there trul
Back in Seattle, around the comer from the Discovery Institute, Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there trul
admin
2013-01-15
74
问题
Back in Seattle, around the comer from the Discovery Institute, Stephen Meyer offers some peer-reviewed evidence that there truly is a controversy that must be taught. "The Darwinists are bluffing," he says over a plate of oysters at a downtown seafood restaurant. "They have the science of the steam engine era, and it’s not keeping up with the biology of the information age."
Meyer hands me a recent issue of Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews with an article by Carl Woese, an eminent microbiologist at the University of Illinois. In it, Woese decries the failure of reductionist biology—the tendency to look at systems as merely the stun of their parts—to keep up with the developments of molecular biology. Meyer says the conclusion of Woese’s argument is that the Darwinian emperor has no clothes.
It’s a page out of the antievolution playbook: using evolutionary biology’s own literature against it, selectively quoting from the likes of Stephen Jay Gould to illustrate natural selection’s downfalls. The institute marshals journal articles discussing evolution to provide policymakers with evidence of the raging controversy surrounding the issue.
Woese scoffs at Meyer’s claim when I call to ask him about the paper. "To say that my criticism of Darwinists says that evolutionists have no clothes," Woese says, "is like saying that Einstein is criticizing Newton, therefore Newtonian physics is wrong." Debates about evolution’s mechanisms, he continues, don’t amount to challenges to the theory. And intelligent design "is not science. It makes no predictions and doesn’t offer any explanation whatsoever, except for God did it."
Of course Meyer happily acknowledges that Woese is an ardent evolutionist. The institute doesn’t need to impress Woese or his peers; it can simply co-ocpt the vocabulary of science— "academic freedom," "scientific objectivity," "teach the controversy"—and redirect it to a public trying to reconcile what appear to be two contradictory scientific views. By appealing to a sense of fairness, ID finds a place at the political table, and by merely entering the debate it can claim victory. "We don’t need to win every argument to be a success," Meyer says. "We’re trying to validate a discussion that’s been long suppressed."
This is precisely what happened in Ohio. "I’m not a PhD in biology," says board member Michael Cochran. "But when I have X number of PhD experts telling me this, and X number telling me the opposite, the answer is probably somewhere between the two."
An exasperated Krauss claims that a truly representative debate would have had 10,000 pro-evolution scientists against two Discovery executives. "What these people want is for there to be a debate," says Krauss. "People in the audience say, Hey, these people sound reasonable. They argue, ’People have different opinions, we should present those opinions in school.’ That is nonsense. Some people have opinions that the Holocaust never happened, but we don’t teach that in history."
Eventually, the Ohio board approved a standard mandation that students learn to "describe how scientists continue to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory." Proclaiming victory, Johnson barnstormed Ohio churches soon after notifying congregations of a new, ID-friendly standard. In response, anxious board members added a clause stating that the standard "does not mandate the teaching or testing of intelligent design." Both sides claimed victory. A press release from IDNet trumpeted the mere inclusion of the phrase intelligent design, saying that "the implication of the statement is that the ’teaching of testing of intelligent design’ is permitted." Some pro-evolution scientists, meanwhile, say there’s nothing wrong with teaching students how to scrutinize theory. "I don’t have a problem with that," says Patricia Princehouse, a professor at Case Western Reserve and an outspoken oppnent of ID. "Critical analysis is exactly what scientists do."
What does Woese mean when he answers back for his remark "... evolutionists have no clothes?"
选项
A、His criticism of Darwinists should not be understood as the denial of it
B、Clothes themselves are not what evolutionists are interested in
C、Einstein is right when he is criticizing Newtonian physics
D、Einsteinian physics is an improvement on Newtonian physics
答案
A
解析
从文中第4段“Debates about evolution’s mechanisms, he continues, don’t amount to challenges to the theory”可以看出Woese批评Darwinists,但并不是在否认它。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Dn2O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Howdoesithappenthatchildrenlearntheirmothertonguesowell?Whenwecomparewithadultslearningaforeign11.______
Howdoesithappenthatchildrenlearntheirmothertonguesowell?Whenwecomparewithadultslearningaforeign11.______
【66】Astateuniversitypresidentwasarrestedtodayandchargedwithimpersonateapoliceofficerbecame,theauthoritiessay,h
IaskedmymotherifIcouldgoout,andshe______.
Withmostonlinerecruitmentservices,jobseekersmustchoosetheirwordscarefully;______thesearchenginewillnevermaketh
TheCommitteepronouncedfourmembersexpelledforfailuretoprovideinformationinthe______ofinvestigations.
Aslongasherparentscanremember,13-year-oldKatieHarthasbeentalkingaboutgoingtocollege.Hermother,Tally,afinanc
Onebusyday,Iwasracingaroundtryingtogettoomuchdone,andIexclaimedtomythreekidsinthecar,"Wecangetboththi
InthefirstyearorsoofWebbusiness,mostoftheactionhasrevolvedaroundeffortstotaptheconsumermarket.Morerecentl
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【1】tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncommon
随机试题
成人脊髓下端平齐()
A.清心除烦B.明日强腰C.补脾益气D.益肾健骨E.润肠通便
关于人民检察院制作起诉书的表述,下列哪一选项是错误的?
在轻金属中,纯金属绎合金后共同均改变的性能是()。
A注册会计师对审计程序的下列安排有助于获取控制活动在某期间运行有效性的审计证据的是()。
对同一课税对象,无论其数额大小,都按照相同比例征税的税率是()。
孕妇赵某11月1日晚因阵痛被家人送往医院。于11月3日凌晨分娩出女儿李某某。出院后,孩子父亲李某至公安机关为女儿申报出生登记,户口簿上登记为11月8日。依据现有法律,李某某的出生时间是:
请仔细观察下图,并根据提供的信息回答问题。较上年同期,2009年山东省6月份原材料燃料动力购进价格指数为()。
今年我国将进一步深入推进供给侧结构性改革,坚持把发展经济着力点放在实体经济上,继续抓好“三去一降一补”,大力简政减税减费,不断优化营商环境,进一步激发市场主体活力,提升经济发展质量。下列做法无法实现政策目标的是:
某厂进行材料加工,制造甲、乙两种环保包装箱,已知同样用3平方米材料制成的甲箱个数比制成的乙箱个数少2个,且制成一个甲箱比制成一个乙箱需要多用20%的材料。如果制作甲、乙两种包装箱共60000个,且甲箱数量不少于乙箱数量的2倍,则最少需要材料:
最新回复
(
0
)