首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
The medical community owes economists a great deal. Amartya Sen won a Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences in 1998. He has spent hi
The medical community owes economists a great deal. Amartya Sen won a Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences in 1998. He has spent hi
admin
2015-03-27
85
问题
The medical community owes economists a great deal. Amartya Sen won a Nobel Prize for Economic Sciences in 1998. He has spent his entire career promulgating ideas of justice and freedom, with health rarely out of his gaze. Joseph Stiglitz won a Noble in 2001. In 1998, when he was chief economist at the (then) notoriously regressive World Bank, he famously challenged the Washington Consensus. And Jeff Sachs, a controversial figure to some critics, can fairly lay claim to the enormous achievement of putting health at the center of the Millennium Development Goals. His "Commission on Macroeconomics and Health" was a landmark report, providing explicit evidence to explain why attacking disease was absolutely necessary if poverty was to be eradicated. And I must offer my own personal gratitude to a very special group of economists—Larry Summers, Dean Jamison, Kenneth Arrow, David Evans, and Sanjeev Gupta. They were the economic team that drove the work of Global Health 2035.
But although we might be kind to economists, perhaps we should be tougher on the discipline of economics itself. For economics has much to answer for. Pick up any economics textbook, and you will see the priority given to markets and efficiency, price and utility, profit and competition. These words have chilling effects on our quest for better health. They seem to marginalize those qualities of our lives that we value most of all—not our self-interest, but our humanity; not the costs and benefits of monetary exchange, but vision and ideals that guide our decisions. It was these issues that were addressed at last week’s Global Health Lab, held at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
Anne Mills, Vice-Director of the School, fervently argued the case in favor of economists. It was they who contributed to understanding the idea of "best-buys" in global health. It was economists who challenged user fees. And it was economists who made the connection between health and economic growth, providing one of the most compelling political arguments for taking health seriously. Some economists might adore markets, but not health economists, she said. "Health care is different." For her kind of economist, a health system is a "social institution that embodies the values of society".
Although competition has a part to play in health, it should be used judiciously as a mechanism to improve the quality of care. Chris Whitty, Chief Scientific Adviser at the UK’s Department for International Development, expressed his contempt for those who profess indifference to economics. Economics is about the efficient allocation of scarce resources. Anyone who backed the inefficient allocation of resources is "immoral". He did criticize economists for their arrogance, though. Economists seemed to believe their ideas should be accepted simply because of the authority they held as economists. Economics, he said, is only one science among many that policy makers have to take into account. But Clare Chandler, a medical anthropologist, took a different view. She asked, what has neoliberal economics ever done for global health? Her answer, in one word, was "inequality". Neoliberal economics frames the way we think and act. Her argument suggested that any economic philosophy that put a premium on free trade, privatization, minimal government, and reduced public spending on social and health sectors is a philosophy bereft of human virtue. The discussion that followed, led by Martin McKee, posed difficult questions. Why do economists pay such little attention to inequality? Why do economists treat their theories like religions? Why are economists so silent on their own failures? Can economics ever be apolitical? There were few satisfactory answers to these questions.
Which of the following best describes the author’s attitude toward economists?
选项
A、Contempt.
B、Reservation.
C、Detachment.
D、Endorsement.
答案
C
解析
作者对经济学家的态度是比较客观的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/DrCv777K
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
阅读下面材料,回答问题。材料一越南战争使美国的政界、军界高层在后来进行战争决策时“形成一种新的共识:美国只应把动用军事力量作为最后一种手段;只有当美国国家利益明显受到影响时方可这样做:只有当获得公众强有力的支持时才能这样做;只有在有可能相对较快地以较小代
Whenastudenthasmadeasentence"IborrowedapaperfromMissLi",theteachers;"Doyoumeanapieceofpaper?"Herethet
Ateacherhandedoutalistoftwenty"if"sentencesandaskedstudentstodiscussandfindoutthegrammaticalrules.What’sth
The______approachtowritingteachingpaysattentiontonotonlywhattowrite,butalsohowtowrite.
Questioningplaysanimportantrolefortheclassroomteaching.Whichofthefollowingquestionsdoesnotbelongtocomprehensio
Inthecollege-admissionswars,weparentsarethetruefighters.We’repushingourkidstogetgoodgrades,takeSATpreparator
Whatshouldyouthinkaboutintryingtofindyourcareer?Youareprobablybetteratsomeschoolsubjectsthanothers.Thesema
Inmostcircumstances,theassumptionofcooperationissopervasivethatitcanbestatedasacooperativeprincipleofconvers
______stageforteachingwritingincludesdiscussionordebateonrelevanttopic,picturetelling,freetalk,readingshortpass
随机试题
认知一般指人的认识活动或认识过程,不包括()
原始社会第三次社会大分工中出现的寄生阶级是()
《灵枢.决气》中关于液的分布和功能有
胃癌的常见转移部位是()
《江城晚报》记者张某在某报上发表一篇评论性文章,文中谈到:“江城文坛中,有的作家剽窃别人的作品当作自己的作品出版,有的作家昧着良心沦为有钱人的‘枪手’,文化素质和道德水平都有待大幅度地提高。”该报在江城所辖的甲、乙、丙、丁四个区发行。该市的作家陈某和李某认
对符合总登记要求的宗地,由国土资源行政主管部门予以公告。()
假设生产某种产品的原材料价格上涨了,则这种产品的()。
下列主体中,不能作为票据保证人的有()。
某企业以“2/20,n/60”的信用条件购进原料一批,由于企业资金紧张,欲在第90天付款。则企业放弃现金折扣的成本为()。
社会治安综合治理的领导力量是各级党委和政府。()
最新回复
(
0
)