首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2013-06-12
86
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
People working in a not-for-profit organization ______ .
选项
A、seem to be difficult to satisfy
B、are free to express diverse opinions
C、are less effective in making decisions
D、find it easier to reach agreement
答案
B
解析
因为由第三段可知,非盈利机构发现意见冲突大有益处,其结果必然是大家畅所欲言,即,很自由地表达不同意见。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/EFhi777K
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
Learningdisabilitiesareverycommon.Theyaffectperhaps10percentofallchildren.Fourtimesasmanyboysasgirlshavelea
Itisnotclearwhethertheincreaseinreportsisstemmedfromgreaterhumanactivityorissimplytheresultofmoresurveys.
Childrenmodelthemselveslargelyontheirparents.Theydosomainlythroughidentification.Childrenidentify【C1】______apar
ThenumberofpermanentcrewontheInternationalSpaceStationwillbeincreased,andpossiblydoubled,from2006byproviding
ThenumberofpermanentcrewontheInternationalSpaceStationwillbeincreased,andpossiblydoubled,from2006byproviding
Somecriminalslangissohighlydevelopedthatpickpockets,forexample,can______aconversationinfrontofavictimwithout
______allofuswhoareheretonight,IwouldliketothankMr.Johnsonforhisinformativetalk.
Thereisnodirectflight,soIflewtoPittsburgh______Philadelphia.
Man:Noteverywomancoulddothethinglikeher.Sheisextraordinary.Woman:Yeah,sheis.ButI’llhavemymoments.Question:w
(Inspiteof)theever-increasingexploitationofnaturalresources,(that)hasnowreacheddangerousproportion,(little)hasb
随机试题
短期资金市场包括()。
若有以下程序段:intr=8:printf("%d\n",r>>1):输出结果是()。
吸收操作的依据是根据混合物的挥发度的不同而达到分离的目的。
脱位的治疗原则,哪一项不确切:
患者男,68岁,突发剧烈胸痛2小时入院,往有高血压病史,未予重视,入院查体:BP180/100mmHg,P80次/分,双肺呼吸音粗,未闻及湿啰音,心率80次/分,律齐,未闻及杂音。为明确诊断应进一步做哪些检查
患者头晕目花,少气倦怠,腹部有坠胀感。脱肛。舌淡苔白。脉弱。其证候是
西机公司2月末有关资料如下:“原材料”总账借方余额45000元,其所属明细账的余额如下:甲材料:300公斤单价60元计18000元乙材料:200公斤单价90元计18000元丙材料:200公斤单价45元计9000元
下列行为中,列入契税征收对象的有()。
扩张性货币政策主要指()。
Itisunusualforthere______somanytouristsonthebeachatthistimeoftheyear.
最新回复
(
0
)