首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2013-06-12
61
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
People working in a not-for-profit organization ______ .
选项
A、seem to be difficult to satisfy
B、are free to express diverse opinions
C、are less effective in making decisions
D、find it easier to reach agreement
答案
B
解析
因为由第三段可知,非盈利机构发现意见冲突大有益处,其结果必然是大家畅所欲言,即,很自由地表达不同意见。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/EFhi777K
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
WiththeSwitzerland-basedWorldWildlifeFund(WWF),Chinaismakingaconcertedanddedicatedefforttosavetheendangeredpan
Somepeopleapparentlyhaveanamazingabilityto______therightanswer.
Man:Youknowwhat?Youshouldinvestthemoneyyourself.Woman:Thathadcrossedmymind.Question:Whatdoesthewomanmean?
Childrenmodelthemselveslargelyontheirparents.Theydosomainlythroughidentification.Childrenidentify【C1】______apar
ThenumberofpermanentcrewontheInternationalSpaceStationwillbeincreased,andpossiblydoubled,from2006byproviding
Aninternationaltreatysignedseveralyearsagobanstradeinplantsandanimalofendangeredspecies.
Man:Noteverywomancoulddothethinglikeher.Sheisextraordinary.Woman:Yeah,sheis.ButI’llhavemymoments.Question:w
A:Ijustcan’tstandthisclassanymore!B:______It’srequired,andyouhavetositinitinordertograduate.
ProfessorJohnson’sretirement______fromnextJanuary.
随机试题
简述谈判沟通中涉及的要素。
窦房结位于()
有关黑色素瘤的描述,错误的是
女性,28岁。因颜面部皮疹、双下肢水肿半年,尿少1周来诊。既往体健。查体:BP160/100mmHg,贫血貌,颜面部蝶形红斑,双下肢凹陷性水肿。提问7:患者已婚,若拟妊娠。下列描述中不正确的是A.该患者目前不适合妊娠B.若抗磷脂抗体阳性,以
乙类传染病中下列疾病必要时采取强制性措施控制,除了
利息备付率表示使用企业盈利偿付利息的保证倍率,对于正常经营的企业,利息备付率应满足的条件为()。
政府采购中,采购人具有要求采购代理机构遵守委托协议约定的权利。()
文学创作主体的心灵自由和社会担当问题,一直是义学理论和创作实践关注的核心问题之一。如何辩证地看待和准确地处理“心灵自由”和“社会担当”之间的关系,辩证地看待、准确地处理文学和时代的关系,至关重要。 我们崇尚心灵自由。新时期以来,文学
Somepeopleareagainstit,becausetheythinkitwillnotsolvetheage-oldproblemsofthebusinesses.
Marytoldmenottoworrybecausethe(operate)______onMr.Smithwasverysuccessful.
最新回复
(
0
)