首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2013-06-12
44
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
People working in a not-for-profit organization ______ .
选项
A、seem to be difficult to satisfy
B、are free to express diverse opinions
C、are less effective in making decisions
D、find it easier to reach agreement
答案
B
解析
因为由第三段可知,非盈利机构发现意见冲突大有益处,其结果必然是大家畅所欲言,即,很自由地表达不同意见。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/EFhi777K
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
Visualimpairment(视觉障碍)carrieswithitareducedorrestrictedabilitytotravelthroughone’sphysicalandsocialenvironmentu
Herman’ssuccessisduetohishardworkandhisabilitytoformulateplanswhichwillgetworkdoneefficiently.
(Nomatter)poorone(maybe),(one)canalwaysfindsomethingtobe(thankfulfor).
Thosegovernmentswillprovidebigfoodandfuel______accordingtotheAsianDevelopmentBank.
Comparedwiththeircosmologist(宇宙学家)colleagues,cosmogonists(星源学家)cansoundalittleold-fashioned.EdgarAllenPoeturnedto
Somecriminalslangissohighlydevelopedthatpickpockets,forexample,can______aconversationinfrontofavictimwithout
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷淡)andstagnation(呆滞).
Althoughinteriordesignhasexistedsincethebeginningofarchitecture,itsdevelopmentintoaspecializedfieldisreallyqui
Isnothingsacred?Eventheidleweekendpastimeofskimmingstonesonalakehasbeentakenapartandreducedtoamathematical
Theparty’sreducedvotewas______oflackofsupportforitspolicies.
随机试题
医生行使干涉权不是针对
( )形式的特点是,管理承包公司是由项目管理人员组成的智力密集型单位,本身无设计、制造、安装、调试队伍,有较丰富的项目管理经验,因而可以较好地代替甲方搞好项目管理,发挥总承包的作用。
工程建设不同阶段对工程项目质量起着不同的影响。工程()是决定工程项目质量的关键环节。
组成冶金设备与建材设备所共有的设备是()。
相对于其他筹资方式,企业通过发行股票筹资的优点不包括()。
甲公司拥有乙公司80%的有表决权股份,能够控制乙公司的财务和经营决策。2020年6月1日,甲公司将本公司生产的一批产品出售给乙公司,售价为1600万元(不含增值税),成本为1000万元。至2020年12月31日,乙公司已对外售出该批存货的40%,当日,剩余
我国古代著名书法作品《十七帖》的作者是()
在我国北方严寒冬季的夜晚,车辆前挡风玻璃会因低温而结冰霜。第二天对车辆发动预热后,玻璃上的冰霜会很快融化。何宁对此不解,李军解释道:因为车辆仅有的除霜孔位于前挡风玻璃,而车辆预热后除霜孔完全开启,因此,是开启除霜孔使车辆玻璃冰霜融化。以下哪项如果为真,最能
土地革命战争时期,中国的红色政权能够存在与发展的主观条件有()
Inthefollowingessay,eachblankhasfourchoices.Choosethebestanswerandwritedownontheanswersheet.Thepurposeoft
最新回复
(
0
)