首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞).
admin
2013-06-12
68
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy (冷淡) and stagnation (呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness (分裂) and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
People working in a not-for-profit organization ______ .
选项
A、seem to be difficult to satisfy
B、are free to express diverse opinions
C、are less effective in making decisions
D、find it easier to reach agreement
答案
B
解析
因为由第三段可知,非盈利机构发现意见冲突大有益处,其结果必然是大家畅所欲言,即,很自由地表达不同意见。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/EFhi777K
0
在职申硕(同等学力)英语
相关试题推荐
Learningdisabilitiesareverycommon.Theyaffectperhaps10percentofallchildren.Fourtimesasmanyboysasgirlshavelea
Accordingtothispassage,troublesontheroadareprimarilycausedby______.Inthewriter’sopinion,______.
Oneofthereasonswhyscienceisimportantforchildrenisthatmanyofthemwill______Thereisnodoubtthatchildrenlike
Somepeopleapparentlyhaveanamazingabilityto______therightanswer.
Theshygirlfeltquite______anduncomfortablewhenshecouldnotanswertheinterviewer’squestion.
ThenumberofpermanentcrewontheInternationalSpaceStationwillbeincreased,andpossiblydoubled,from2006byproviding
Conventionalwisdomaboutconflictseemsprettymuchcutanddried.Toolittleconflictbreedsapathy(冷淡)andstagnation(呆滞).
Thequalityandnumberofacity’spublicroadsofferanexcellentmeansofgaugingitsprosperity.
Movingpartsofmachinesandmotorvehicleshavetobe______regularlytoreducefriction.
A:Ijustcan’tstandthisclassanymore!B:______It’srequired,andyouhavetositinitinordertograduate.
随机试题
在一次心动周期中,左心室压力最高的是()。
(1)JustwhenTransportforLondon(TfL)thoughtthebikehireschemeprovidedananswertoLondon’scarbonemissionsproblem,t
隐孢子虫感染多为
Doyourememberallthoseyearswhenscientistsarguedthatsmokingwouldkillusbutthedoubtersinsistedthatwedidn’tknow
手术治疗胃十二指肠溃疡的适应证不包括()。
患者,女性,57岁。肺源性心脏病史10年。近5天来咳嗽、气促加重。查体示肺气肿体征。动脉血气:pH7.30,PaCO250mmHg,PaO260mmHg,给患者吸氧的正确方式是
Ⅱ类设备的绝缘电阻在直流电压为500V的条件下测试,其包括的内容中不正确的是()。
意识水平高低的判断的客观方法为()。
依据《中华人民共和国教师法》,为保障教师完成教育教学任务,下列有关各级人民政府、教育行政部门、有关部门、学校和其他教育机构应当履行职责的说法,不正确的一项是()
把一根钢管锯成5段需要8分钟,如果把同样的钢管锯成20段需要多少分钟?( )
最新回复
(
0
)