首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as
admin
2014-06-02
64
问题
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug.
If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as the debate over health-care reform exploded, this is the season of "17. 5k dead women a year. " That’s the body count scaremongers are predicting if the Food and Drug Administration rescinds its provisional approval of the drug Avastin for metastatic breast cancer, a decision expected by year’s end. Although the move has nothing to do with the new health-care law, uncertainty about "Obama-care" has given opponents an opening to terrify people about what’s coming—like bureaucrats rationing health care to save money.
The reality is far different and, for those who care more about helping cancer patients than about scoring political points, much sadder. That’s because in 2008, when the FDA gave "fast track" approval for Avastin in breast cancer that has metastasized—usually to the lungs, bones, liver, or brain—it was conditional on the manufacturer, Genentech, running additional clinical trials of the drug’s safety and efficacy. There was good reason for that. Avastin is an angiogenesis inhibitor, a class of cancer drugs that have not lived up to their hype: although they stop one mechanism by which malignant cells grow blood vessels to sustain them, the cells often activate a different mechanism and go on proliferating.
Although Avastin does extend the lives of patients with metastatic colorectal and kidney cancer, and remains FDA-approved for those uses, the new studies show it does not work the same miracle against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Instead, Avastin increased what’s called progression-free survival (how long before cancer spreads or grows) by about one to three Weeks, depending on which chemo agent it was paired with. But it did not keep women alive any longer than chemo alone. To some advocates, progression-free survival without an increase in overall survival is still welcome, since it suggests patients have a better quality of life during their last months.
But it’s hard to make that case for Avastin. Not only did it not keep women alive, but it also caused hypertension, hemorrhaging, bowel perforations, and other side effects. "It seems as if the drug’s toxicity cancels out any benefit," cancer surgeon David Gorski of the Karmanos Cancer Institute told me. Perforated bowels do not equal a better quality of life.
These dismal results are what led an FDA panel to vote 12—1 in July to rescind the conditional approval of Avastin for MBC. Critics of health-care reform, predictably, saw nefarious motives—in particular, evidence that Obamacare will ration expensive drugs. (Avastin costs some $88,000 a year, though few patients live that long.) The Wall Street Journal editorialized about the "Avastin mugging," and Sen. David Vitter accused the FDA of "assigning a value to a day of a person’s life. "
If Avastin did extend lives for, let’s say, $ 10,000 a day, Vitter might have a case. But it doesn’t extend life at all. That makes allegations like the 17,500 dead women (from a right-wing blag) "utter demagoguery of the most vile and despicable sort," Gorski wrote on the blog Science-Based Medicine.
There are stories galore of women with metastatic breast cancer who are alive "because of Avastin." Indeed, patients have been flooding the airwaves and blogosphere with claims that Avastin helped them. But the only way to tell whether Avastin deserves the credit for keeping patients alive is through large studies. "There are always patients who live longer than average," biostatistician Donald Berry of the MD?Anderson Cancer Center told me. "They attribute it to the treatment; people love to make attributions." But when the proportion of patients alive at any given time in a study is the same whether they are receiving Avastin or not—as the two large trials found—then crediting Avastin is "very likely wrong. " That some women did live longer on Avastin, Berry explained, "may simply reflect the natural heterogeneity of the disease and say nothing about the therapy. "
Doctors can keep prescribing Avastin for metastatic breast cancer off-label, though insurers will not pay for it. Some activists welcome that. There is "no evidence of clinical benefit from Avastin, yet there is harm," says Fran Visco, president of the National Breast Cancer Coalition. "We need to demand more of treatment before we unleash it on the public. " Science-based medicine isn’t always pretty. But it’s better than politics-based medicine, which is what some critics of the Avastin decision are practicing—and much better than deluding ourselves into thinking something works when it doesn’t.
Why may the FDA rescind its approval of Avastin?
选项
A、Because it may cause breast cancer to metastasize to other organs
B、Because it did not keep women alive.
C、Because it may cause side effects.
D、Because its toxicity outweighs its benefits.
答案
D
解析
文章第三段提到晚期乳腺癌是指肿瘤细胞已经扩散到身体其他部位,并不是阿瓦斯丁造成的。文章第四段提到阿瓦斯丁并不能延长晚期乳腺癌病人的生命。第五段中提到阿瓦斯丁会带来一些副作用,但归根结底,撤销使用阿瓦斯丁的原因是使用阿瓦斯丁弊大于利。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/EVpO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Asregardsofsocialconventions,wemustsayawordaboutthewell-1.______knownEnglishclasssystem.Thisisanembarrassin
Thebizarreanticsofsleepwalkershavepuzzledpolice,perplexedscientists,andfascinatedwritersforcenturies.Thereisan
Banksarecloselyconcernedabouttheflowofmoneyintoandoutofthe【M1】______economy.Theyoftencooperatewithgovern
A、Whetherthesupplierscouldrespondquicklytodemand.B、Whethercustomerswouldbeworriedabouttheprice.C、Whetherproduct
A、bittenbymosquitoesatnightB、hitbyabicycleC、havingtogetupearlyD、havingtoferryinthemorningA
Cooperativecompetition.Competitivecooperation.Confused?Airlineallianceshavetravellersscratchingtheirheadsoverwhat’s
SimonFanshawepresentsdifferentpeople’sopinionsonBritishmannersbecause
DisappearingActTherehavebeenrumors.There’sbeengossip.AllHollywoodisshockedtolearnthatCalistaFlockhart,star
Inthesummerof1896,Mr.WilliamHolt,awealthymanufacturerofChicago,waslivingtemporarilyinalittletownofcentralNew
SimonFanshawepresentsdifferentpeople’sopinionsonBritishmannersbecause______.
随机试题
人们在乘坐小船时,应尽量坐下,站立会降低小船的稳定性,其根本原因是:
[A]GMlabellingisnoteasy[B]KeepawayfromGMfoods[C]GMfoodsarenotthatbad[D]GMfoodsareinfaceofp
食品中常见的细菌为食品细菌。()
纷纷暮雪下辕门,风掣红旗冻不翻。掣:翻:
下列制剂中,需要检查金属性异物的剂型是()
开发建设的商品住宅占城镇住宅供应量近()。
当价格总水平上涨幅度高于财政收入增长幅度时,表明财政收入的增长状况是()。
A公司于1999年3月8日由B公司、C公司、D公司、E公司共同发起设立方式成立。A公司成立时的股本总额为人民币30000万元(每股面值为人民币1元,下同)。2002年8月8日A公司获准发行10000万股社会公众股,并于8月31日上市;此次发行完毕后,股本总
老师穿了一套新衣服,课前一进班级,所有学生的眼光都盯着老师。有几个淘气的男同学就凑在一起,用调侃的语调大声喊道:“老师,我爱你。”下列处理方式,最恰当的一项是()。
WhereisthetownofSanJuanCapistrano?
最新回复
(
0
)