2. 外语
  3. Theories are like apples; there are good ones and there are bad ones. A good apple is flavorful and nutritious. A good theory is

Theories are like apples; there are good ones and there are bad ones. A good apple is flavorful and nutritious. A good theory is

admin2011-01-02  30
问题    Theories are like apples; there are good ones and there are bad ones. A good apple is flavorful and nutritious. A good theory is one that we have good reason to believe is true, or at least likely to be true. Apples have all sorts of features that are indicative of goodness and that can be used at the store for making smart choices. An apple’s color, shininess, shape, and firmness are related to its flavor and food value. Similarly, theories have features that are indicative of their truth, and the task of justification is to identify these features and use them to guide choices as to which theories to believe. In this way, responsible theory choice and responsible science are not unlike responsible shopping. The big difference is that you get to go home and eat the apple and find out if you were right and it really does taste good. With theories, however, there is no feature that is the taste of truth, at least not that we get to sample. There are only features that indicate truth. You never get to go home and see unambiguously that atomic theory, for example, is true. But you do the best you can.
   Theories have lots of different properties and can differ one from another in a variety of different ways. A few have been mentioned already, namely the degree of generality and hypothetical status of a theoretical claim. An account of the properties of a theory is an answer to the inquiry, "So tell me what this theory is like." There are plenty of things to say, that is, plenty of features to mention. There is the feature of how it was discovered, by whom, at what time of day. Some theories have the feature of being proposed by Einstein; some lack his feature. Some have the feature of being liked by Einstein; some don’t. There are also features of the content of a theory or of its form. Being logically consistent is a feature of form. Making reference to action at a distance, or to evil spirits, or to gluons are distinct features of content. There are even pragmatic features. Some theories are likely to be money-makers; others are not.
   Clearly, some of these features of theories are irrelevant to an analysis of scientific knowledge and irrelevant to doing science. We want to focus on the important features, those that meet the following two criteria. First, they must be relevant to the likelihood of the theory being true. That is, they must be reliable indicators of truth so that our seeing whether the feature is present or not will be part of our warrant for believing the theory. Some theories have the property that you learned them on a Tuesday, but that is unimportant because it is neutral to their being true or false. Some theories have the property of describing goblin maintenance men to keep the world in good working order. That’s an important feature because it helps us decide whether the theory is true or false.
   The second criterion of importance is that the property is something we can in fact evaluate. The information must be accessible to us if it is to be of any use. To get back to apples for a moment, even if it’s true that apples with darker seeds taste better, this isn’t any help there in the store where information about the seeds isn’t available. Similarly, a theory about the demise of dinosaurs is true if it is an accurate picture of the past events, but the feature of being an accurate picture is not something we can evaluate. We can’t see what this theory is a picture of, and so we can’t assess its accuracy. Much as we would like to use accuracy-of-picture or correspondence-to-facts as features that indicate truth, information about these features is unavailable. Features that are important to the justification of theories must be both truth-conducive and accessible.
Which of the following cannot be used to explain what a theory is like?
选项 A、An account of the properties that a theory has.
B、A description of various features that a theory may have.
C、A detailed account of the features of the theory’s content and form.
D、An introduction to the contributions made by Einstein to science.
答案D
解析 该题问：下面哪一项不能用来解释理论是什么样的?本题是一个否定性问题。不能用来解释某个理论如何的选项才是答案。由第二段第三行An account of the properties of a theory is an answer to the inquiry，"So tell me what this theory is like．" There are plenty of things to say，that is, plenty of features to mention(描绘理论所具有的性质就可以回答“请告诉我这个理论如何”。这样的询问，有多事可说，有很多特色可谈)，可知，选项A的“描绘理论所具有的性质”；和选项B的“描绘理论所具有的特色”都可以用来解释某个理论如何，都不是答案。由该段第七行There are also features of the content of a theory or of its form．Being logically consistent is a feature of form(还有理论内容方面的特色和形式方面的特色。逻辑上前后一致就是理论形式上的一个特色)，可知，选项 C的“详细描绘理论内容的特色和形式的特色”可以用来解释某个理论如何，不是答案。第二段第五行提到 Some theories have the feature of being proposed by Einstein；some lack this feature(有些理论有爱因斯坦提出的特色；有些理论就没有这个特色)。但是，选项D的“介绍爱因斯坦在科学上作出的贡献”与理论的特色无关，与某个理论如何无关。所以，选项D应为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/EalO777K
0

专业英语八级

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)