首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A two-year study beginning in 1977 found that, among 85-year-old people, those whose immune systems were weakest were twice as l
A two-year study beginning in 1977 found that, among 85-year-old people, those whose immune systems were weakest were twice as l
admin
2019-11-17
56
问题
A two-year study beginning in 1977 found that, among 85-year-old people, those whose immune systems were weakest were twice as likely to die within two years as others in the study. The cause of their deaths, however, was more often heart disease, against which the immune system does not protect, than cancer or infections, which are attacked by the immune system.
Which of the following, if true, would offer the best prospects for explaining deaths in which weakness of the immune system, though present, played no causal role?
选项
A、There were twice as many infections among those in the study with the weakest immune systems as among those with the strongest immune systems.
B、The majority of those in the study with the strongest immune systems died from infection or cancer by 1987.
C、Some of the drugs that had been used to treat the symptoms of heart disease had a side effect of weakening the immune system.
D、Most of those in the study who survived beyond the two-year period had recovered from a serious infection somet me prior to 1978.
E、Those in the study who survived into the 1980s had, in 1976, strengthened their immune systems through drug therapy.
答案
C
解析
Argument Construction
Situation This question presents a puzzling scenario and asks us to find a possible fact that could make the situation less puzzling. The scenario involves a study that was conducted a few decades ago on a certain group of older adults. Those with the weakest immune systems were much more likely to die within two years than were the other individuals in the study. However, among the individuals with the weakest immune systems, death was more often by heart disease, from which the immune system does not protect, than from cancer or infections, for which a strong immur e system is protective.
Reasoning For the participants in the study with the weakest immune systems, what might best explain the deatr s that were not due to weakness of the immune system?’We might expect that the people with the weakest immune systems would be more likely to die from diseases that a strong immune system would protect them from than from other diseases. An explanation of the deaths that were not due to weakness of the immune system would explain why this is not the case.
A This point is irrelevant. The hypothesis that the participants in the study with the weakest immune systems had more infections than did the other participants does not explain why those participants died from conditions that were not infections.
B Our question involves identifying a possible explanation for the deaths of the participants in the study with the weakest immune systems. This option, about the deaths of those with strong immune systems, is thus irrelevant.
C Correct. This option suggests that those with heart disease—which would not have been due to weakness of the immune system—would have nevertheless had a weaker immune system due to the administration of certain drugs. Those with heart disease may for this reason have been among those with the weakest immune systems. If the individuals with weak immune systems due to treatment for heart disease formed a large-enough portion of the patients with the weakest immune systems, then we would have an explanation for why those with the weakest immune systems were more likely to die from heart disease than from infections or cancer.
D This option is not specific enough for us to use in the explanation we are looking for. For example, the "serious" infections in question may have occurred well before the 1977 study. Furthermore, there may appear to be no significant relationship between having had a serious infection and death from a condition that was not an infection.
E This option is also not specific enough to be a factor that might reasonably offer the explanation we are looking for. For example, given the information in this option, it could have been the case that all of the participants had the drug therapy.
The correct answer is C.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/EhkO777K
本试题收录于:
GMAT VERBAL题库GMAT分类
0
GMAT VERBAL
GMAT
相关试题推荐
Longbusridesareliketelevisionshows.Theyhaveabeginning,amiddle,andanend--withcommercialsthrownineverythreeor
Longbusridesareliketelevisionshows.Theyhaveabeginning,amiddle,andanend--withcommercialsthrownineverythreeor
——Youseemtoshowinterestincooking.——What?________,I’mgettingtiredofit.
"Helicopterparenting"describesastyleofraisingchildrenwhereparentsareover-protectiveanddotoomuch.Thetermwasuse
Coffeeisapowerfuldrink.Onapersonallevel,ithelpskeepusawakeandactive.(80)Onamuchgenerallevel,ithashelpedsh
Iwasnervous—desperatelynervous—aboutbecomingcar-free.Buteightmonthsagoourcarwashit,andthedamagewassobaditha
______ofthetwobrothersarefondofclassicalmusic.
Lastyear______ofnewbookswerepublishedonenvironmentalprotection.
Scientistssaidtheyhavefoundevidenceofagiantplanetfaroutinoursolarsystem.Inastatement,theCaliforniaInstitute
随机试题
白喉毒素应用于治疗肿瘤的根据是()
某工程项目估算总投资2200万元,其中施工估算价1000万元,设备采购估算1000万元,勘察估算43万元,设计估算100万元,监理估算价57万元。在施工招标过程中,业主委托该省建委进行招标,按照法律程序确定以公开招标的方式分阶段进行招标。[问题]
背景某施工单位承包一立井井筒与井底环行车场项目。在井筒施工中某一夜班,主提升绞车由司机张某一人值班,在下放吊桶时打盹,导致吊桶全速过放。当时李某正穿过吊桶下方去移动水泵,因躲闪不及被当场砸死。事故发生后,井下作业人员由于恐慌争先上井,杨某上半身被挤出吊桶
下列各项中,不属于消费税征收范围的是()。
当前我国乡村度假旅游需求虽然发展迅猛,却遇到了农家乐产品质量欠佳的情况。这种情况体现的是旅游供求()的矛盾。
下列各项财务指标中,能够提示公司每股股利与每股收益之间关系的是()。
采购物品定价的常用方法是()。
人民法院审理行政案件,是审查行政行为的()。
二战后初期,美国倡导成立“关贸总协定”的主要目的是()
经过20多年的自然保护,甘肃祁连山区野生动物的数量大大增加。活动于甘州一带的野生岩羊经常闯入牧场,侵食牧草,糟蹋草场。山丹马场放牧的羊时常被出没的狼群活活咬死。岩羊的天敌是雪豹和狼,山丹马场距甘州不过百余公里,但甘州的岩羊却未遭狼群侵害。如果以下
最新回复
(
0
)