首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
45
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on ______.
选项
A、how well they get along with the students
B、how well they give their lectures
C、how many papers and books they have published’
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ErlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Thewitnesstoldthecourtthathe______theaccusedbefore.
Theauthorsayschildreninthecityseldomwenttothewoodsandthefieldsbecause______.Accordingtothepassage,youngpe
Althoughhethoughthewashelpinguswiththejob,(但他只是在碍我们的事).
RecentstudiesbytheCouncilofEuropeshowthat______.Althoughwealldependontheresourcesofnatureforoursurvival__
Somepuretheorists,likeEinstein,carelittleaboutthe______(apply)oftheirtheories.
"Imissedthetrainhomelastnight.""So______"
Forthispart,youaresupposedtowritealetterin100--120wordsaccordingtothefollowingsituations.你是Jane。写信给你的朋友J
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowaridcompletethefollowingdialoguesbyblackeningthecorres
Howcanwegetridofgarbage?Dowehaveenoughenergysourcestomeetourfutureenergyneeds?Thesearetwoimportantque
(79)TheOlympicGamesareheldeveryfouryearsinadifferentcityintheworld.Athletesfrommanycountriescompeteinavari
随机试题
已知A是三阶矩阵,α1,α2,α3是线性无关的三维列向量,满足求矩阵A的特征值;
“中兴四大诗人”指的是________、________、范成大、尤袤。
可有效防止术后胆胰液进入残胃的胃大部切除方法是
在整个妊娠过程中,妊娠中期是指
有一三绕组电源变压器,一次绕组U1=220V,N1=880匝,二次侧有两个绕组,分别输出U21=36V,U22=12V,当分别接上P21=120W,P22=100W纯电阻负载时,忽略变压器损耗,一次绕组中电流I1=()A。
教学设计的基本要素是什么?
科学家们证实,这种化学物质具有很强的水溶性,对土壤几乎没有亲和力,同时它又是很难分解的寿命很长的物质。______甲基叔丁基乙醚见光可分解,______阳光很难进入土壤和地下水中。______,它一旦进入地下水中,人们就很难将它“请”出来,______它渗
有网友发帖称,8月28日从湖北襄樊到陕西安康的某次列车,其有效座位为978个,实际售票数却高达3633张。铁道部要求,普快列车超员率不得超过50%,这次列车却超过了370%,属于严重超员。如果以下陈述为真,哪一项对该网友的论断构成严重质疑?
哪种方法被认为是冗余最多的?A、N+1B、N+NC、N+N+1D、N*N+1
America’smostpopularnewspaperwebsitetodayannouncedthattheeraoffreeonlinejournalismisdrawingtoaclose.TheNewY
最新回复
(
0
)