首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
64
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on ______.
选项
A、how well they get along with the students
B、how well they give their lectures
C、how many papers and books they have published’
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ErlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Theauthorsayschildreninthecityseldomwenttothewoodsandthefieldsbecause______.Accordingtothepassage,youngpe
Itwasessentialthattheapplicationforms______backbeforethedeadline.
You______meyourtelephonenumberincasesomeonewantstocontactyou.
Thefireis______,althoughthesmellofsmokeisstillstrong.
Agreatmanycancerscanbecuredbutonlyif______beforetheyhavebeguntospreador"colonize"inotherpartsofthebody
AtthefirstsighttheplanetMarsdoesnotappearverywelcometoanykindoflife.Ithasverylittleoxygenandwater;thete
Itis_____thatmynephewisreallyfondofclassicmusic,whichhehasbeenexposedto(熏陶)foryears.
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguebyblackeningthecorrespo
Itwassocoldthattheykeptthefire______allnight.
CliffordStollranacomputersysteminBerkeley,California.Asasystemadministrator,hekeptacloseeyeontherecords.One
随机试题
谈谈对联常用的手法。
简述经济全球化的功能。
血管性痴呆的特征是
使用旋风除尘器净化含尘浓度(标准状态)C=45g/m3的含尘气体,在正常运行时除尘器的总效率为90%,在不正常运行时,有10%的漏入风量,这时除尘器的通过率为正常运行时通过率的2倍。则在不正常运行时,除尘器的出口含尘浓度(标准状态)为()
物业服务的甲方是业主委员会(代表业主大会),为聘用方;乙方是物业服务企业为受聘方合同的期限由双方协议商定,以()为单位。
甲产品经三道工序制成。已知第一、二、三工序的在产品件数和在产品定额工时分别为10件、20件、30件,10小时、20小时、20小时,则在产品的约当产量为()。
汽车销售公司销售小轿车时一并向购买方收取的下列款项中,应作为价外费用计算增值税销项税额的是()。
军警不分,警政合一是古代警察的特点之一。()
正确处理人民内部矛盾的总方针是
Fordays,Beijinghasbeentrappedunderablanketofyellow-browndustthattheU.S.Embassyairmonitorclassifies,initsho
最新回复
(
0
)