首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
58
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on ______.
选项
A、how well they get along with the students
B、how well they give their lectures
C、how many papers and books they have published’
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ErlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Thereislittleneedformarketingintheplacesuchasasubsistencefarm,because______.By"haveahandintheprocessoft
Thisletterwaswrittenby______.Themanlosthisjobbecause______.
Agreatmanycancerscanbecuredbutonlyif______beforetheyhavebeguntospreador"colonize"inotherpartsofthebody
Youwillhavetopractice______timesbeforeyoucandoit.
AtthefirstsighttheplanetMarsdoesnotappearverywelcometoanykindoflife.Ithasverylittleoxygenandwater;thete
Beforetheconferencebegan,aJapanesebusinessmanwasintroducedtoanAmericanbusinessmanatthelounge.TheJapanesebusine
Thereareseveralmeansofmasscommunication.Thenewspaperisone.Televisionis______.
Thefootballmatchwastelevised_____fromtheBeijingOlympicStadium.
EveryoneusestheexpressionsAMandPM.Butdoyouexactlyknowwhattheymeanandhowtheycameintobeing?Asyouknow,t
随机试题
5岁小儿,因高热,咽部和扁桃体充血肿胀,表面有点状黄白色渗出物来院就诊,以猩红热收入院。目前该患儿体温达39℃,全身出疹。皮疹首发于耳后,之后遍及全身。为在弥漫性充血的皮肤上出现分布均匀的针尖大小的丘疹,疹间无正常皮肤。针对高热的正确护理措施是(
先天性白内障晶状体混浊位于瞳孔区应采取哪种治疗
根据牙周袋的形态以及袋底位置与相邻组织的关系,可分为()。
宏图时代公司2011年3月发生如下的经济业务,要求编制下列业务的相关会计分录。(1)销售甲产品,价款40000元,增值税6800元,款项尚未收到,成本为20000元。(2)计算本月应交城市维护建设税420元,教育费附加180元。(3)本月结算职
山东某国有企业从美国进口一批贱金属废碎料用于加工出口产品,该企业应该向当地环境保护主管部门提出废物进口申请,由其审核并报国家环保总局批准,凭国家环保总局签发的《进口废物批准证书》办理通关手续。()
从审计的独立性、有效性来讲,受本单位( )领导的内部审计最有效。
()的经验类化理论强调概括化的经验或原理在迁移中的作用。
()指食品支出总额占个人消费支出总额的比重。
6,16,56,132,250,()
构成CPU的主要部件是_______。
最新回复
(
0
)