首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
55
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on ______.
选项
A、how well they get along with the students
B、how well they give their lectures
C、how many papers and books they have published’
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ErlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Inthesupermarket(人人自助购物).
Thepresident’ssuggestionisthat(在这个村里建一所小学).
Duringthesummervacationtherewillbearevisedscheduleofservicesfortheuniversitycommunity.Specificchangesforinter
______herage,shereallydidagoodjobinsuchashorttime.
“Willanotherfiftybeenough?”“Justtwentywill______.”
A、coughB、thoughC、laughD、enoughB
"Doyoulikebeingmarried?""Yes,butI’mnotused______everynight."
Whensomeonehasmoney【56】hewantstoputinasageplace,he【57】takesittoabank.Untilrecentlythevery【58】ofthebankbuil
CliffordStollranacomputersysteminBerkeley,California.Asasystemadministrator,hekeptacloseeyeontherecords.One
CliffordStollranacomputersysteminBerkeley,California.Asasystemadministrator,hekeptacloseeyeontherecords.One
随机试题
患者,男性,28岁。车祸致伤,伤后右髋关节疼痛剧烈不能活动。查体:患肢短缩。呈屈曲、内收、内旋畸形,应首先考虑的诊断是
A.肺气肿B.肺不张C.肺水肿D.肺脓肿E.肺褐色硬化慢性心力衰竭导致
下列关于休克代偿期微循环的变化,说法错误的是
在致甲亢的各种病因中,哪种最多见
城市的建设和发展之所以需要干预,关键在于各项建设活动和土地使用活动具有极强的()
(操作员:李主管;账套:102账套;操作日期:2015年1月1日)新增客户往来单位。单位编码:009单位名称:ABC集团单位类型:无信用额度:人民币50000元所属地区:区外单位地址:山
遗传物质的最小功能单位叫做()。
在市场经济条件下,只要机会均等,合法竞争,不坑蒙拐骗、不搞特权和腐败,社会中贫富差别的出现,就只能归结为个人的先天差异、后天努力及机会运气等原因。据此,可以推出()。
据报道,我国在基础研究到企业产品开发的过程中,有90%的科研成果死掉了。这是多么惊人、多么可怕的“死亡之谷”。长期以来,我们所缺的主要不是成果(当然,重大的高质量成果另当别论),但有一个致命伤:转化率低。据不完全统计,目前我国上百万件专利技术、科研成果处于
下列横线处应填入的短语是______。①(她)抬头看时,______的风雪,像一团烟雾似的。②她爬起身来,一眼就看见身子半垂在沟沿上的女儿。______的雪地上,汪着一滩鲜红的血水。
最新回复
(
0
)