首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
34
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on ______.
选项
A、how well they get along with the students
B、how well they give their lectures
C、how many papers and books they have published’
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ErlC777K
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Therewasalargewarehouse(在河对岸).
【B1】【B20】
AlthoughIspoketohimmanytimes,henevertookany______ofwhatIsaid.
Beforetakingsuchatest,onehadbetter______hisorhervocabulary.
Thefootballmatchwastelevised______fromtheBerlinOlympicStadium.
BeijingistospenduptoUS$20billiontochangetheChinesecapitalintoa21st-centuryoneforthe2008Olympics.Theg
Mostdictionarieswilltellyouanumberof【21】aboutalanguage.Therearethreethingsinparticularthat【22】important.Theset
Todayapilotistotallydependentonwhattheairtrafficcontrolleronthegroundtellshim.Hecan’tseeenoughtobesafe.F
Whensomeonehasmoney【56】hewantstoputinasageplace,he【57】takesittoabank.Untilrecentlythevery【58】ofthebankbuil
CliffordStollranacomputersysteminBerkeley,California.Asasystemadministrator,hekeptacloseeyeontherecords.One
随机试题
鼻咽癌的特点是
室性心动过速的临床症状不包括以下哪项
促使胃排空的原动力来源于
从事中间介绍业务的证券公司应当建立协助开户制度,其主要内容包括()。
财务顾问为目标公司提供的服务有()。
百米竞赛的预备信号与起跑信号间隔2秒比较合适,相隔太长时间才发起跑信号,影响运动员成绩,原因在于()。
为保证断路器具有足够的合闸速度,操纵机构必须具有()。
以前有几项研究表明,饮用咖啡会增加饮用者患胃溃疡的可能性。而一项最新的、更为可靠的研究得出结论是,饮用咖啡与胃溃疡发病率无关。估计这项研究成果公布以后.咖啡的消费量会大大增加。上述推论基于下列哪项假设?
从所给四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性
德育过程
最新回复
(
0
)