首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example,
admin
2016-07-10
82
问题
In popular discussions of emissions-rights trading systems, it is common to mistake the smokestacks for the trees. For example, the wealthy oil enclave of Abu Dhabi brags that it has planted more than 130 million trees—each of which does its duty in absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. However, this artificial forest in the desert also consumes huge quantities of irrigation water produced, or recycled, from expensive desalination plants. The trees may allow its leaders to wear a halo at international meetings, but the rude fact is that they are an energy-intensive beauty strip, like most of so-called green capitalism. And, while we’re at it, let’s just ask: What if the buying and selling of carbon credits and pollution offsets fails to reduce global warming? What exactly will motivate governments and global industries then to join hands in a crusade to reduce emissions through regulation and taxation?
Kyoto-type climate diplomacy assumes that all the major actors will recognize an overriding common interest in gaining harness over the runaway greenhouse effect. But global warming is not War of the Worlds, where invading Martians are dedicated to annihilating all of humanity without distinction. Climate change, instead, will initially produce dramatically unequal impacts across regions and social classes. It will reinforce, not diminish, geopolitical inequality and conflict.
As the UNDP emphasized in its report last year, global warming is above all a threat to the poor and the unborn, the "two parties with little or no political voice". Coordinated global action on their behalf thus presupposes either their revolutionary empowerment or the transformation of the self-interest of rich countries and classes into an enlightened "solidarity" without precedent in history. From a rational perspective, the latter outcome only seems realistic if it can be shown that privileged groups possess no preferential "exit" option, that internationalist public opinion drives policymaking in key countries, and that greenhouse gas reduction could be achieved without major sacrifices in upscale Northern Hemispheric standards of living—none of which seems highly likely.
And what if growing environmental and social turbulence, instead of stimulating heroic innovation and international cooperation, simply drives elite publics into even more frenzied attempts to wall themselves off from the rest of humanity? Global intervention, in this unexplored but not improbable scenario, would be silently abandoned(as, to some extent, it already has been)in favor of accelerated investment in selective adaptation for Earth’s first-class passengers. We’re talking here of the prospect of creating green and gated oases of permanent affluence on an otherwise stricken planet.
Of course, there will still be treaties, carbon credits, famine relief, humanitarian acrobatics, and perhaps, the full-scale conversion of some European cities and small countries to alternative energy. But the shift to low-, or zero-emission lifestyles would be almost unimaginably expensive. And this will certainly become even more unimaginable after perhaps 2030, when the combined impacts of climate change, peak oil, peak water, and an additional 1. 5 billion people on the planet may begin to seriously threaten growth.
What is the author’s attitude towards the shift to low-emission lifestyles?
选项
A、Doubtful.
B、Supportive.
C、Ambiguous.
D、Encouraging.
答案
A
解析
态度题。题目问的是“作者对转向‘低排放’的生活方式持什么态度?”。由文章最后一段第二、三句“…the shift to low-,or zero-emission lifestyles would be almost unimaginably expensive.And this will certainly become even more unimaginable after perhaps2030…”可知:这种转变代价很高,而且在2030年后可能会变的更难。由此可以推断作者对转向“低排放”的生活方式持怀疑态度。故选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/EsWd777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语五级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语五级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Multidisciplinaryscienceisalltheragethesedays.Even(31),theoverlapbetweenarchaeologyandpharmacologyisnot,atfir
AnswerQuestionsbyreferringtotheeventswhichhappenedduringthetermswhen3Americanpresidentsheldofficeinthefollow
It’s1997,andit’srainingandyou’llhavetowalktoworkagain.Anygivensubwaytrainbreaksdownonemorningoutoffive.T
______issoldwell?______enablesplayerstoconstructbuildingsindifferentstyles?
Internationalinvestorsseemincapableofendingtheirloveaffairwiththedollar.America’seconomyhasslowedsharplythisye
______itisthemostcommonformofmelanomainpeopleofcolor?______itoftenlookslikeabruiseornailstreakintheear
ThedistinctivearchitecturalfeatureofthetypicalBroadwaytheateristhejuxtapositionoftwoalmostindependentbuildingsf
Youwillreadaquestionwhichsays,"WhichisabettersourceofnewsNewspaperorTV?" Writeanarticleforthenewspaper
InpartsofBrazil’spoornortheast,snakesandparrotsareonsalebytheroadsideforafewreais.InBrazil,aselsewherein
随机试题
有一混合蛋白质溶液,所含5种蛋白质的pⅠ分别为4.6、5.0、5.3、6.7和7.3,电泳时欲使其中4种泳向正极,则电泳缓冲液的pH应是
下列哪一项不是生命神圣论的局限性
四君子汤的功效是
下列关于火灾风险说法中,正确的是()。
在填写票据时,14609.08元大写金额的正确写法是( )。
纳税人欠缴的税款发生在纳税人以其财产设定抵押之前的,税收应当优先于抵押权执行。()
《加莱义民》是________国雕塑家________的作品,他另外的代表作有________。
公司2015年的总资产为2000万,股权负债比为1:1,2015年销售收入为1500万,利息率为6%,变动资本率为30%,固定成本为财务费用的10倍,2016年销售收入为2000万,求2016年的息税前利润增长率。
(2005上项管)由于政府的一项新规定,某项目的项目经理必须变更该项目的范围。项目目标已经做了若干变更,项目经理已经对项目的技术和管理文件做了必要的修改,他的下一步应该是______。
在完全二叉树的顺序存储中,若节点i有左子女,则其左子女是节点【】。
最新回复
(
0
)