首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first expl
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first expl
admin
2011-02-11
29
问题
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first explosion was detonated. Hearing the sirens and seeing London’s emergency personnel respond to the bombings brought back vivid memories of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
People have not forgotten Sept. 11, 2001. Americans can still recall exactly where they were and what they were doing on that fateful day. But it’s understandable that some remember it as historical fact, lacking the painful impact and immediacy they originally felt. If we allow a dimming of purpose—to eliminate terrorism—these terrorist attacks in London serve as another chilling reminder that we’re still at war.
Something constructive emerges from these tragic, horrible and unexplainable attacks. It is the message that we must remain vigilant in opposing an enemy who intentionally targets innocent civilians.
Since Sept. 11, 2001, the civilized nations of the world have remained mostly united in opposing these despicable, wanton acts of terror. We have had some great successes in that effort. We have arrested perpetrators and plotters, and we have foiled planned attacks. We have reduced the power and scope of those who despise freedom and democracy.
The effort must continue. As we learned Thursday—and in Madrid and Bali—the enemies of freedom have not lost their resolve. We must not lose ours.
Ultimately, the only real defense from terrorist attacks is being able to find out about them in advance. Intelligence gathering has improved but needs to be even stronger, including consistently improving human intelligence and patrol. Police and ordinary citizens must be alert and encouraged to convey information.
Once a terrorist incident does occur, there’s no such thing as a perfect response. By definition, a terrorist attack means people are being hurt or killed. But by studying the response to past attacks, we can better prepare to handle those in the future.
London is one of the most secure cities in the world, steeped in years of dealing with terrorism. The city’s preparation and resolve was evident on Thursday. I am very impressed by London’s reaction to the bombings. Both the emergency personnel and the citizens seemed prepared. The first responders were rapid, well-directed, organized and professional, in accordance with obviously well-tested plans.
As for the citizens, at least a dozen people told me in one way or another, "We knew this was going to happen; it was just a question of when."
That is not only a realistic assessment; it also is a mindset that just might save lives. Political, business and community leaders are sometimes reluctant to talk about terrorism or stage drills to prepare their response because they don’t want to frighten or upset people. But that’s a mistake. People react to emergencies more effectively when they’re not shocked by them.
Tony Blair and London Mayor Ken Livingstone have made preparedness a priority, and their efforts clearly paid off during Thursday’s response to the attacks.
There’s another benefit to preparing for terrorism in advance. Part of the damage the terrorists hope to inflict is the emotional reaction in the wake of the destruction. The reason it’s called’ "terrorism" is that they want fear and its debilitating effects to linger long after the smoke has cleared.
By preparing citizens for the possibility of a terrorist attack, leaders can help minimize the emotional response in the wake of the destruction.
Finally, Thursday’s attacks demonstrate that we must remain committed to confronting and eliminating terrorism. There are those who assert that the efforts to eliminate terror are somehow provoking the terrorists. That is wrong. The terrorists have been attacking innocent people long before Sept. 11, 2001, or the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Seeing Prime Minister Blair speak so forcefully, with President Bush, President Jacques Chirac and other world leaders right behind him; was encouraging. Let’s remember the unity the world shared after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Free nations can and will disagree. But let us always remember that free people must be steadfast and resilient in defending our way of life.
The terrorist attack in London conveys to us the message that
选项
A、people in London did not feel painful.
B、we must be on the alert for terrorism.
C、we should stay at home to avoid terrorism.
D、the effort at anti-terrorism was in vain.
答案
B
解析
第3段最后一句提到,在反对蓄意以无辜平民为袭击目标的敌人肘,必须保持警醒。文中的remain vigilant与B项中的be On the alert同义,故B正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/F2YO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheCulturalRevivalintheByzantineEmpireBetweentheeighthandeleventhcenturiesA.D,theByzantineEmpirestagedana
AnewweaponisonthewayinthefightagainstsmokinginEurope.Soonwhensmokersbuycigarettestheymightseeashockingph
Theswingingsinglelifestyleofthestereotypeismostpossibleforurban,educatedprofessionalandtechnicalpeople.Onlythe
InmyearlychildhoodIreceivednoformalreligiouseducation.Idid,ofcourse,receivedthatethicalandmoraltrainingthat
ModernExaminationsIntheschoolsofancienttimes,themostimportantexaminationswerespoken.Usuallythestudentswere
AuthorEmmaHeathcote-Jameshasspentnineyearslookingintoreal-lifeghoststories,collectingtalesfromhundredsofpeople
Artcanbemadeofalmostanything,includingsubstances【M1】______thathavenotbeenproducedandusedin
BritishPrimeMinisterTonyBlairbelongsto______
ItisdifficultforanagencyasoldasJ.WalterThompson,whichwillmm140nextyear,torecordsomefirstsatsovenerablea
C语言学概念的实例分析。本题属于形态学的范畴,考查词素(morpheme)的类型。toys,walks,John’s都是在原有单词的基础上加上了曲折词缀(inflectionalaffix),即不改变原单词含义的后缀,故选C。
随机试题
March26,2016Mr.SamuelBrownTruestarCorporationFinanceDepartmentManagerRe:Account #2958ADearMr.Br
试述我国风景名胜区的设立。
戴明环的主要着重点是
急性呼吸窘迫综合征急性肺损伤
下列可用于软膏剂的制备方法是
用于整理质量特性统计数据、观察生产过程质量稳定与否并可用于制定质量控制公差标准的数理统计方法是( )。
甲县某煤矿、天然气开采企业为增值税一般纳税人,2019年2月发生如下经营业务:(1)开采原煤3万吨,采用分期收款方式销售1.5万吨,不含税销售额为840万元,合同规定本月收回60%的货款,其余款项3月15日收回,本月实际收回货款340万元。(2)将开采
把自然数A的十位数、百位数和千位数相加,再乘以个位数字,将所得积的个位数字续写在A的末尾,称为对A的一次操作。设A=4626,对A进行一次操作得到46262,再对46262操作,如此进行下去,直到得出一个2010位的数为止,则这个2010位数的各位数字之和
与“大五”人格结构模型比较,七因素模型增加的因素是
在二次分配中调节公平的税种包括()。
最新回复
(
0
)