首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Of all the catastrophes that could befall America in coming years, a big terrorist attack, perhaps even bigger than those on Sep
Of all the catastrophes that could befall America in coming years, a big terrorist attack, perhaps even bigger than those on Sep
admin
2015-04-26
24
问题
Of all the catastrophes that could befall America in coming years, a big terrorist attack, perhaps even bigger than those on September 11th 2001, may be more likely than others. Who would pay for the millions in property damage, business losses and other claims from such an attack?
This is the question with which America’ s Congress is currently wrestling. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA. was passed as a temporary measure after September 11th to provide a government back-stop for the insurance industry in the event of a catastrophic attack. It now says government can step in when insured losses from a terrorist event top $ 5 m. TRIA has helped to stabilize the market, and enabled insurers to continue offering terrorism-risk cover even after swallowing the big losses imposed by September 11th. But unless Congress acts fast, TRIA will expire at the end of the year. One likely result is the loss of terrorism-risk cover for thousands of firms and proper-ty owners. This, in turn, could disrupt businesses and make some commercial activity impossible. With modifications, TRIA should be extended.
The Bush administration has been opposed to extension. It has always seen TRIA as a shortterm measure, and has argued that the private sector should assume sole responsibility for terrorism insurance. This is the right goal. A purely private solution would be best, lifting any future burden-from the taxpayer and relying on the industry to price and spread risks more accurately than any government can do. But relying entirely on the private sector immediately does not look feasible. With TRIA’ s expiration looming, insurers and reinsurers have not, as the administration expected, rushed to write new contracts for next year offering to fall gaps in terrorism cover.
Why the hesitation? Unlike other risks, the threat of terrorism cannot be forecast in time or scope, making a mockery of insurers’ underwriting models. A big chemical, biological or nuclear attack is a prospect few can price, or afford to cover. Insurers are already being threatened with downgrades by rating agencies for the terrorism cover they have sold.
One reason is that insurance, far from being a free market, is already one of the most heavily regulated of industries. Operating in a highly distorted marketplace, with 50 state regulators, the insurance industry seems to be having trouble pricing the largest of terrorism risks in a way that is credible and can still offer insurers a profit. Letting TRIA expire, and abruptly withdrawing the government role in insuring the largest losses, would just exacerbate this problem.
Any renewal of TRIA should, once again, be limited to two years, say. Its extension must also shift more of the burden, and the business, to the private sector. If an extension is agreed and TRIA’ s threshold for government intervention is raised substantially, work should begin now to find better longer-term solutions. One place to look is abroad, where governments have dealt with terrorism risk for years. In Britain, for instance, insurers have created a pool of capital that is backed by the government and, over time, shifts a greater share of risk on to the private sector. Other options to consider include tax changes that reduce the cost of holding capital by insurers and reinsurers, and facilitating the use of catastrophe bonds.
With fewer regulatory distortions of insurance markets, a solely private solution may be attainable in the long run. In the current environment, though, the same government that regularly warns of terrorist threats must still have a role to play in a solution that safeguards America’ s financial security. It would be better to plan ahead than wait for a rushed, Katrina-style bail-out after a big attack. Amid all the uncertainties, one thing seems clear: any such bail-out would be more costly and lead to even greater market distortions without an extension of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act today.
The extension of TRIA should aim at______.
选项
A、making government intervention more unacceptable
B、introducing foreign companies into terrorism insurance
C、setting up catastrophe bonds managed by insurers and reinsurers
D、pushing the private sector to take sole responsibility
答案
D
解析
倒数第二段谈及TRIA延期应注意的问题,指出“如果同意延期,政府干预也减少,那么工作重心就应该放在寻求better longer—term solutions上”,随后作者以英国为例解释了这一长期措施“将大部分风险负担转移给private sectors”,第三段,作者也提到a purely private solution would be best,选项D正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/F5ua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Itisaresearchthatisguaranteedtodelightmen—andinfuriatethewomenintheirlives.Acontroversialnewstudyhasclaime
Therearemorerichpeoplethaneverbefore,includingsome7millionmillionaires,andover400billionaires.Fromsippingcham
"Gender",astheWorldHealthOrganizationdefinesit,"isusedtodescribethosecharacteristicsofwomenandmen,whichareso
“Weareinterestedincontentthatpeoplewanttosharepartlyforpragmaticreasons.”这句话准确的汉语翻译是()。
中非合作论坛(ForumonChina-AfricaCooperation,简称FOCAC),是中华人民共和国和非洲国家之间在南南合作范畴内的集体对话机制,成立于2000。论坛的宗旨是平等【R21】________、增进了解、扩大【R22】_____
Manywho______theirvisitstothedentistregretitlater.
Youaresupposedtowriteacompositionofatleast150wordsonthefollowingtopic.Promises
Lifeteachesusnottoregretoveryesterday,forithaspassedandisbeyondourcontrol.Tomorrowisunknown,foritcouldeit
Theroleofgovernmentsinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapable.Sometimes,thestatetriestomanagetheresou
Idon’tregret______herwhatIthoughtofherhusband,eventhoughitmighthaveupsether.
随机试题
Whocantakepartineachoftheclasses?ClassparticipantsAchildrenandteenagersBadultsCallagesTheMon
萨罗威和梅伊尔提出的情绪智力表现为()
ManytimesofaneveningIwouldstandontheshoreandlookedouttosea,whereacuriousphosphorescent(发磷光的)greenwaschang
关于裸体井巷的施工质量要求,说法正确的是()。
能够阻止外部环境的热流进入,减少冷量损失,维持保冷功能的核心层是()。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性。
()对于风险相当于精兵简政对于()
老张购进一批商品,共20件。销售时,每件合格的商品可以赚50元,不合格的商品一件亏20元。他卖出的这20件商品中有几件是不合格的,那么卖出这批商品可能赚()。
为计算1+2+22+23+24+…+210的值,并把结果显示在文本框Text1中,若编写如下事件过程:PrivateSubCommand1Click() Dima&,s&,k& s=1 a=2 Fork=2To10
Butterischeapwhenitisplentiful,and___________whenitisinshortage.
最新回复
(
0
)