首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Why bother with the study of history? What possible connections exist between an increasingly remote past and our own predicamen
Why bother with the study of history? What possible connections exist between an increasingly remote past and our own predicamen
admin
2011-01-21
50
问题
Why bother with the study of history? What possible connections exist between an increasingly remote past and our own predicaments(困境) in the present? Can stories about other peoples in other places at any other times have any meaning in an age of vaulting (飞速发展的) technology and traumatizing (惊人)change? Is it reasonable to think that anyone can benefit from the experiences of others in a presumably unprecedented(前所未有的) time when our political and economic systems falter (踉跄), and the nuclear, peril causes nightmares of dread? These questions hold more than rhetorical importance and compel serious answers. Undergraduates in all programs of study need to know what they can hope to learn and how their experiences will affect their capacity to think and act creatively in the future.
Skeptics have often argued that a knowledge of history will not provide much help. The American industrialist Henry Ford characterized history as "bunk, "Although the observation probably tells more about the limitations of Ford’s mind that about the nature of history, other luminaries(名人) have expressed similar reservations. In the seventeenth century, the French scientist and mathematician Rene Descartes worried that undue curiosity about the past would result in excessive ignorance of the present. Another Frenchman, Francois Marie Arouet de Voltaire, a philosopher and historian, described history as "a pack of tricks we play on the dead. " Although he meant the comment as an appeal for history written more accurately, he inadvertently gave support to the cynical claim that historians invariably fall into one of three camps: those who lie, those who are mistaken, and those who simply do not know. Even so powerful a thinker as Georyg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, a nineteeth-century German, feared that the only thing we can learn from history is that no one learns anything from history.
Undoubtedly the writing of history is a perilous (危险的) venture. A common lament among historians is the fact that every day requires them to face up to their incomprehension of the world and their incapacity to interpret their evidence correctly. Surely they should rank among the hum- blest of people. Nevertheless, for many, the sheer joy of the endeavor makes the risk worthwhile. Some even have assigned to themselves important and useful functions. Most historians regard the study of history as a way for human beings to acquire self-knowledge. Edward Gibbon, the great English historian of the Roman Empire, sadly described the historical record as consisting of"the crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind. "Though certainly indicative of a wretched and dismal (阴沉的) state of affairs, his remark also held forth the possibility of escaping such conditions through rational in quiry. Transcendence over the past could come about only through knowledge.
Other historians have invoked (行使) their discipline as a kind of ethical sanction (制栽). Lord Acton, a Victorian Englishman, insisted upon maintaining morality as the sole impartial criterion of men and things. "He called upon historians to act as arbiters, defending the proper standards, out of an expectation that the threat of disapproval in the future might discourage incorrect behavior in the present. Historians should call malefactors to account for their misdeeds.
Still others presumed the existence of links between the past and the future and suggested that comprehension of what had taken place might prepare for what will come about. How to get ready for the unknown has always posed a great problem. Geople Santayana, a Harvard philosopher, asserted early in the twentieth century that people who forget about the past are condemned to repeat it. This utilitarian (实利主义的) conception saw in the discipline a way of developing workable strategies for survival. History comprised the recollections of all people. Santayana’s claim affirmed that things learned from experience could aid in the avoidance of mistakes, pitfalls, and catastrophes in the future.
The author is likely to go on to _______.
选项
A、talk about the importance of history
B、give his own opinions on the aims and purposes of historical studies
C、prove the invalidity of history books
D、present more schools of thought in studies of history
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/FA3d777K
本试题收录于:
公共英语三级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语三级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Properarrangementofclassroomspaceisimportanttoencouraginginteraction.Mostofushavenoticedhowimportantphysicalse
InwhichsituationIndianswouldn’tusesignlanguageaccordingtothepassage?
Whichwordmaybestdescribetwospeakers’positionsonintermarriage?
Muchofthelanguageusedtodescribemonetarypolicy,suchas"steeringtheeconomytoasoftlanding"or"atouchonthebrakes
business从对话中两个句子“Well,I’mgoingtostudybusinessatcollege.”和“Doyouthinkthatbusinessstudieswillhelp?”中可以判断他要学business。
TheSupremeCourt’sdecisionsonphysician-assistedsuicidecarryimportantimplicationsforhowmedicineseekstorelievedying
HumanintelligenceandtheIQscalesusedtomeasureitonceagainarebecomingthefocusoffierydebate.Asargumentrages
HowlongdidittakeforalettertogettotheUSAsixyearsago?
随机试题
从100人中调查对A、B两种2008年北京奥运会吉祥物的设计方案的意见,结果选A方案的人数是全体接受调查人数的3/5;选B方案的比选A方案的多6人,对两个方案都不喜欢的人数比对两个方案都喜欢的人数的1/3多2人,则两个方案都不喜欢的人数是()。
下列病变中,斜位吞钡检查,不形成食管压迹的是
A.多饮、多食、多尿、消瘦B.乏力、纳差、血压低、皮肤色素黑C.蛋白尿、水肿、高脂、低蛋白血症D.怕热多汗、疲乏无力、急躁易怒E.蛋白尿、血尿、高血压
知图5-9所示等直杆的轴力图(图中集中荷载单位为kN,分布荷载单位为kN/m),则该杆相应的荷载为()。
隐框玻璃幕墙玻璃板块制作前对基材进行的清洁工作,符合“两次擦”工艺要求的是()。
会计核算上,企业将融资租入的设备计入固定资产,体现了()原则。
观察法是学校教育中常用的研究方法。以观察者是否参与被观察对象的活动为标准,可以将观察法分为()。
要搞好接待工作,沟通好党群、政群的关系,信访接待人员一定要()。
中央电视台举办的“年度感动中国十大人物评选活动”的颁奖辞中有这样一句话:“这个风一样的年轻人,他不断超越,永不言败,代表着一个正在加速的民族。他身披国旗,一跃站在世界面前。”这段文字中“风一样的年轻人”是一个极致的比喻,它主要用于说明()。
司法工作人员帮助在押犯脱逃的,一律成立私放在押人员罪,请对这一说法进行辨析。
最新回复
(
0
)